Motivatingemployee Motivation Case Study

According to researcher Lindner (1998), motivated employees are needed in our rapidly changing workplaces to aid in the survival of organizations. Not only is it important to meet the needs of the consumer, it is equally important that to make sure that associates are taken care of and remain motivated. For this reason, Gibson, Ivancevich, Donnelly and Konopaske (2012) “states much of management’s time is spent addressing the motivation of their employees” (p. 125). According to the Encyclopedia of Small Business (2007), employee motivation is the level of energy, commitment, and creativity employees bring to their jobs; the inner force that drives individuals to accomplish personal and organizational goals (Lindner, 1988). Despite its obvious importance, employee motivation can be an elusive quest for managers due to the multiplicity of incentives that can influence employees to do their best work. The reality is that every employee has different ways to become motivated and the knowledge of how to motivate them is key to organizational success. It is imperative that employers get to know the personal needs and wants of their employees in order to establish tactics in which to motivate each of them. Once achieved, “managers are in a better position to encourage and reward employees to behave in effective ways” (Gibson et al, 2012, p.

Motivation is a main point in which I am interested and in order to understand more about the topic I have based my review in 2 different sources: Forbes article “Motivation Mystery: How to Keep Employees Productive” and Daniel Pink Ted Talk “The Puzzle of Motivation”.

Employee motivation is, or at least must be, one of the key issues for directors, managers and personnel managers. The leader must be able to find the sensitive strings of his subordinates, which can be motivated by influencing them to achieve high performance. The correct use of motivation encourages staff to make more efficient use of their knowledge, skills, and talents. In today's turbulent, often chaotic environment, commercial success depends on the employee's talent and effort. Despite the many existing theories and practices, some of the motivation of leaders today remains a mystical term. This is partly due to the fact that people are motivated by different things and techniques.

The purpose of this paper is to critically evaluate and review three journal articles by John Honore (2009), James Lindner (1998), and an article by Fred Herrera (2002). All three articles discussed the topic of employee motivation in the workplace. The authors examined several motivational theories and put forward their ideas on the concepts and application of motivational techniques. The authors’ work provides insight into the psychology of motivation and the different factors and theories that affect it. My conclusion is in line with the authors’, motivated employees are needed for the organisational survival and just like our constantly changing environment and each individual is different, motivational techniques need to be continuously explored and developed.

McGregor (1960) described two views on human motivation: Theory X and Y. Theory X, the more conventional one, holds the view that people are in themselves not intrinsically motivated to work and even attempt to avoid it, that people have no ambition, are resistant to change, are not particularly intelligent and that people only work for money and security. Management’s objective is to direct employees efforts, motivating them, controlling them and modifying their behavior to ensure that they behave in line with the organization’s needs and goals.

Health care organizations in recent decades have found they must do more with fewer resources, in particular fewer human resources. Economic instability in the United States coupled with governmental changes in health care reimbursement structures have compelled considerable reductions in force in health care organizations and in some instances elimination of services previously provided. In this economic environment, dedicated and motivated employees in health care facilities are the most valuable resources of the organization. However, for employees to be valuable to the organization they must be engaged in the goals,

Motivation in the workplace is one of the major concerns that managers face when trying to encourage their employees to work harder and do what is expected of them on a day-to-day basis. According to Organizational Behavior by John R. Schermerhorn, James G. Hunt and Richard N. Osborn the definition of motivation is "the individual forces that account for the direction, level, and persistence of a person's effort expended at work." They go on to say that "motivation is a key concern in firms across the globe." Through the years there have been several theories as to what motivates employees to do their best at work. In order to better understand these theories we will apply them to a fictitious organization that has the following

Industrial/Organizational (I/O) Psychology is devoted to the study of employee behavior in the workplace and understanding the issues facing organizations and employees in today’s complex and ever changing environment. Motivation refers to the set of forces that influence people to choose various behaviors among several alternatives available to them. An organization depends on the ability of management to provide a positive, fostering and motivating environment for its employees in order to increase profits, productivity and lower turnover rates of its employees. The purpose of this paper is to discuss and compare six academic journal articles and explore the behavior, job, and need based theories of motivation that can aid management in motivating and understanding their employees. Finding that delicate balance to can sometimes be elusive so effectively learning how to motivate by understanding, controlling and influencing factors to manipulate behavior and choices that are available to employees can produce the desired outcome.

As indicated by Skinner (1953: 56), the concept of employee motivation has been clearly understood but rarely practiced. Skinner (1953: 56) continues to urge that in order to understand motivation, there lays great need in understanding human beings. In this regard, human behavior has been strongly correlated with the level of human motivation; meaning the higher the level of motivation, the better the behavior. With this in mind, it has been made clear that, proper employee motivation leads

Employee motivation is a hugely important factor regarding the efficiency and productivity of any organization. Though there are many management theories regarding how employees are best motivated, the majority of these specific theories fall under two broad categories. On the one hand, there is the scientific management theory, or classical approach, in which employees are treated as mechanical components of an organization and motivated purely by economic incentive (Almusaileem, 2012). On the other is the human relations approach, which theorizes that employees are best motivated through group dynamics, human relations and the meeting of social needs (Almusaileem, 2012). However, management theory is significantly more complicated. Each individual responds to motivation differently, and often, the grouping of all employees under one motivating factor or another is ineffective. Personally, I find the human relations approach to be significantly better motivator through the focus on psychological and social needs of the individual (Almusaileem, 2012). Additionally, I find that the human relations approach leaves room for creativity and entrepreneurship, which classical management theory lacks. Most importantly, the human relations approach provides significantly more reward than classical production incentives. Taylor’s theory of scientific management may have made sense in the early part of the twentieth century, in which most employees worked in the industrial

Motivation is what makes people tick: the needs, desires, fears and aspirations within people that make them behave as they do. It is the energizer that makes people take action; it is the why of human behavior. So how do we create something that is supposed to come from within? It cannot be done, but it can be turned on and activated. Through different methods of motivation, incentive programs and rewards, and a positive work environment and culture motivation can be created in any organization. In an organization motivation and productivity (go hand in hand). Motivation is important in organizations because it keeps employees driven to do more, better quality work. Motivating reduces turn over and creates happier more loyal employees who will work with and through their organization to make it the best it can be.

Motivation can be defined as a process that starts with a physiological deficiency that activates a push that is aimed at a goal incentive The aim of this essay is to show that how motivation can be an important factor for better performance of employees in a sector (Steininger, 1994).

then they may be tempted not to come at all. If a worker does not get

Motivation is one of the most discussed topics in the present era’s organisations, especially since renowned psychologists like Maslow and Herzberg are dedicating their efforts to understanding it. Companies are investing a significant amount of resources in improving productivity in order to maximise profits. One of these important resources is of human nature. In order to get the very best out of employees, some motivational approaches need to be used. But what is motivation and how do I successfully motivate? I will try to relate one of my personal experiences with a friend to some of the most influential motivational theories. After introducing my story and making a definition of motivation I will address the ideas of Taylor,

Training will be by certified trainers some of which are employees of the company and others are hired certified trainers and others are a provided by government organizations such as OSHA and extension services. All employees will be trained on complying with all agriculture safety and health standards of OSHA such as “All equipment, when operated by an employee on a public road or highway must have a slow-moving vehicle emblem on it" (Duties).