Management Style in Nigeria

The advantage of the Autocratic leadership style is that it improves efficiency and productivity in addition to be able to quickly respond to

and control in the hands of the manager. In an autocratic style of management, the leader makes all of

Laissez-faire: the transactional leaders give a lot of chances followers for decisions making. So, leaders themselves give up their responsibilities and try to avoid decisions making, then organizations tend to have unclear direction.

This style is an attempt at a compromise whereby the subordinates get to speak their mind and yet the managers are still free to make snap decisions that are in the best interest of the company.

Different leaders have different ways of handling their role as leader of a group, particularly in the workplace. Whatever style a particular manager chooses, however, it is expected that, as leader, that he makes the final decision. Even in a more participatory work environment, it is expected of him or her to cast the deciding vote when there is a tie.

2. Employees will exercise self-direction and self-control if they are committed to objectives. External control and the threat of punishment are not the only means to make employees to work towards objectives.

We have learned the characteristic of decentralization which clearly goes against the grain of a micromanager, but according to White (2010), eliminating hierarchy and shifting responsibility to the lower levels; thereby, expanding on the staff's capabilities which in turn will create

Autocratic leadership can be beneficial when decisions need to be made quickly without consulting with a large group of people or colleague. But

A lazze-faire manager will sit back and trust the decisions of his staff, not intervening on the daily operations and professional decision making of the staff. And a democratic manager, is similar to the participative, however, it is by vote or mutual input not always out of collaboration.

Complete freedom for co-workres or group to make any and all decisions and solving all problems. Laissez-faire leadership can be effective in situations with highly motivates, highly skilled , and solo working employees, co-workers and group members. This leadership also allows for open and available for consolation and feed back of group or co-worker. Disadvantages are typically if a group member or employee may lack knowledge or experience to complete decisions and do tasks on their own. There is also poor defined roles within this leadership allowing for chaos due to take of guidance and roles specifies within the

1. Autocratic Decision. At one end of the spectrum is no participation from others. The leader makes a sole decision without input from other employees or managers.

From there they can be broken down into four distinct management styles; directive democrat, directive autocrat, permissive democrat, or permissive autocrat (Management Styles). My personal management style is a very fluid one, always changing based on the situation; however, I like to keep my basis of my management very consistent. I prefer to work in a permissive democratic style; everyone participates in the decision making process and have the ability to carry out their work more freely (Management Styles). There are times, when in a position of leadership, where a democratic approach may not work and a directing and controlling approach needs to be taken. Employees will need to be told what, and when, to do something. As a manager it is important to understand and recognize when these different approaches need to be taken, and in a way that is allowing the goal to be achieved in a positive

“Decision making is a complex cognitive process influenced by a number of factors” (Johnson & Kruse, 2009, p. 33). A leader is called on to make numerous decisions each day to meet the needs of their organization. The individuals associated with an organization look to the leader to have the answers to the many problems that present themselves. The challenge for the leader to is to make the “right” decision, but what the right decision is varies and is not always clear. The decision-making approach a leader takes can greatly impact the success of an organization, and a leader must always weigh their decisions carefully. The high stakes and complexity of decision making for

Beginning with the Autocratic or Authoritarian leadership style, the leader sets clear guidelines for the results that he or she is searching for. For example, the leader will clarify what processes or tasks should be completed, the deadlines for the assigned processes or tasks, and also the process for how to complete the assigned processes or tasks. This leadership style employs a clear separation between the leader and group of individuals under his guidance.

Laissez faire is the absence of effective leadership (Yukl G, 2010). Laissez faire leaders ignore problems and follower (Yukl G, 2010) and they do not contribute to the growth of the follower ( (Northouse, 2007). Feedback, rewards and leader involvement are totally absent in this type of leadership hence reduced organisational commitment.