Management Styles Analysis

Some management styles may be best for the situation and some may not be. Therefore, awareness on different types of management styles will help the managers to handle different situations the optimal way. Different management styles are capable of handling different situations and solving different problems. Therefore, a manager should be a dynamic person, who has insight into many types of management styles such as:

Managerial style can be define as the characteristic way an organization plans, execute decision relating to employee and management that ensure to enhance growth and productivity of the organization. Every country have it unique managerial style of running it organizations. what apply in one country may necessarily not apply in another country; hence we call it differences! Management is the same but the culture could differ significantly. This depends on the country in focus. A cultural case file emphasis is on Japan vs the U.S. These two countries has a unique way of managing organisations to achieve maximum result, but in very different style. Keep in mind that the culture of each country varies and it 's a factor that drives how management style is applied, and understanding this cultures will help appreciate the diversity of it organization 's activities.

Now that we have touched on culture let’s look at the same two countries and see how each culture affects management styles. Three notable differences of management in Asian countries compared to the US are: (Member, 2014)

The second factor is staff belonging. The general principle of Japanese management is that workers form a family (Alston, 1986). As a part of the corporate ‘family’, every member not only pays attention to their own salaries, but also considers the development of the company. Pay is only one reward. There is also a sense of belongingness and support that employees receive from their corporations. On the contrary, Americans tend to indicate that there is no need for them to become familiar with one organization and colleagues before they are off again on their trips (Wellens, 1980). Perhaps individual freedom is more essential than staff belonging in their mind. This different attitude leads to diverse management styles. One consequence for Japanese is the practice of lifetime employment. The

In the individualistic societies, people are more emphasis their own achievement and initiative. (John, 1980). On the contrast, people form collectivist countries are rely on information provide by others. People are belonging to the group. Group benefits are more important than their own needs. They have their own responsibility to their organization. Japan is a typical collectivism country, while America represents an individualist country. According to the differences in these two cultures, in the organization, managers have to use different management strategies to effectively manage the term. In the collectivist countries, the managers are encouraging the employees taking part in decision making. So it needs longer time to make a decision, but for the decision implement, it takes shorter time, because every member involved in the decision making, they can clearly know the aim and the context of the task.. So the manager should more positively, more frequencely, more widely, and more deeply interact with the group members, in this way, group interacting influence, teamwork and favoritism will be stronger than in IND culture. But in the individualism

Understanding the different styles of leadership is only the first step. Next, it has to be better understood how those leadership styles interact with and affect potential management positions. There are several types of management styles available for organizations to implement, and there is no specific right or wrong answer as to which one works best. Using different styles either individually or together can bring both positive and negative results to a group and organization. In fact, there really is no widely agreed, definitive list to use to approach the subject. However, the best list that could be found through extensive research lead to the five types listed below. These types are Affiliative, Participative, Commanding, Coaching,

Management is a leadership role of someone who works with resources and people to set and achieve goals to make an organization successful. There are many different approaches to management that a manager might use to help discover any problems and make proper decisions to solve anything that might go wrong. When it comes to contemporary methods there are four ways that a manager might utilize working with people, technology, resources, and the internal and external environments. These include sociotechnical theory, quantitative management, organizational behavior, and systems theory. Also, there are parts of an organizations internal and external environments that may alter the effectiveness of these four contemporary approaches and how a manager might makes decisions.

Management styles are a set of skills that appear in divergent traits. Many organizations worldwide have clung onto the authoritative management for centuries. This category of management is known as the “do as I say manager, and seldom accepts input from their team. For an association to generate revenue, all employees must feel some sort of importance.

Let us take China and France as examples of two very different countries that may have cross-cultural problems while doing business. First we will give a general overview of the two countries and then discuss some management practices that may vary between these eastern and western cultures.

Cultural assumptions can influence not just an individual 's behavior, but companies ' strategies and the way they choose to structure their organizations. The systems they use to motivate employees and control the organization similarly may be "culture bound," meaning that the underlying cultural assumptions are from the home country. Culture and the systems work as intended there but may not work when they are transferred and used elsewhere. Companies should understand that to be effective their structures and systems need to "fit," or be in alignment with, the culture and conditions of the countries in which they are operating.

Every country has different management practices. They all have unique approaches that have been found to be the most adequate or efficient way in accomplishing specific objectives. At some point we have heard the English terms culture, management terms, and business culture, yet we don’t have much knowledge about these terms definitions. On the other hand, some of us are not familiar with terms such as “wa”, “quanxi”, and “ inhwa”, Which these terms are essential management terms in Japan, China, and South Korea. In this paper I will be analyzing my findings on the words culture, management terms, business culture, “wa”, “quanxi”, “inhwa”, what would be similar terms to describe American management practices, and if these terms sufficiently capture American management practices.

Cultural differences and the management practices and processes of a firm frequently differ across national and international boundaries, as managers increasingly find themselves working across cultures, the need to understand these differences has become increasingly important (Nardon, SanChez-Runde & Steers, 2010). There is also a need not only to appreciate that cultural differences exist but also to appreciate what such differences mean for international business. International business differs from national business due to the profound differences in social structure, religion, language, education, economic philosophy and political philosophy (Hill, 2013). The different extents to which organisational practices are adapted to the

Every country has different management practices. They all have unique approaches that have been found to be the most adequate or efficient way in accomplishing specific objectives. We have heard the English terms culture, management terms, and business culture, which are commonly used business terms in America. Nonetheless, we don’t have much knowledge about international business terms. International business terms such as “wa”, “quanxi”, and “ inhwa”, which are essential management terms in Japan, China, and South Korea. In this paper I will be analyzing my findings on the words culture, management terms, business culture, “wa”, “quanxi”, “inhwa”, what would be similar terms to describe American management practices, and if these terms sufficiently capture American management practices.

A management style can be defined as an overall method of leadership used by a manager. It is the manner and approach of providing direction, implementing plans, and motivating people. The leadership/management style is a key determinant of the success or failure of any organization.

The most important concerns with management are similar in all parts of the world, they include making effective decisions, coordinating employment security with other needs such as productivity, flexibility, acceptance of change in the company, and emerging young professional managers. The Japanese apply different principles and have developed different approaches to handle these issues, especially in business behavior.