1) As the team leader, you have weighed the pros and cons of all options and prepared a presentation to management on how to address this problem. What do you suggest?
After generating my chart package on the plan forward in the matter of the employee John, a meeting would be scheduled with corporate counsel and human resources for a review to ensure the company would be protected from a civil law suit and not to impinge on John’s civil liberties and rights. My recommendation to management would be to terminate John’s employment. While he has been with the company for over 15 years, there has been a gradual disintegration of his satisfaction with his place in the organization and lack of interest in using corporate resources to attempt to rectify his issues. As an aerospace firm, safety of our employees and the customers flying our planes are paramount. John’s behavior is a distraction to himself and his co-workers. Attention to detail and quality workmanship cannot be diminished by employee drama. John’s progressively worsening behavior at work has been clearly documented via a paper trail. It is time for the company to protect itself and incentivize John to move on in his career.
2) Consider each of the above options. If you were to select it, develop an argument to defend your position.
• Do Nothing Defense:
While John’s behavior is a departure from the normal, the recommendation is to do nothing. This might sound like an attempt to avoid confrontation, when in reality
A summary of the issues with the employee, the steps we have taken to date and feedback provided to the employee.
As the Vice President of Human Resource for Moore Beer, Inc., it is my duty and responsibility to direct all of Moore Beer, Inc. employees in accordance with the company 's policies and procedures as well as abide by all the laws that are put in place to protect employee’s rights. Moore Beer, Inc. has suffered a decrease in sales profits, as a result the company is reducing its workforce. The President of the company asked me to look into the five employees listed below and decide who to terminate as well as provide the reason why the termination is necessary. My job is to terminate three out of the five employees.
Now look at your quotation sentence. Think of two points of commentary for your choices and write them below:
B. Opposers of this idea would say that equality plays a factor here as well.
question. Students must consider factors and provide a rationale for which of these sets of ideas is of greater importance.
2. What options are available to you? How does each of these options serve your personal interests, those of investors and those of employees?
Name your SECOND MAIN idea/reason that supports your argument. Then give and explain facts/evidence to support that reason!
a. I have solid, well-considered ethical beliefs that can be altered only by reasoned arguments or new evidence.
C. Living immorally is the way to gain power, and thus maximize my profit and possessions.
Recommended Organizational Response ……………………………………… . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
While both authors have alternative writing styles, they both discuss the employee treatment. Both authors agree that the employee treatment is not satisfactory. However, Karen Olsson’s article goes into detail about
In the following paragraphs I will try to show you reason for all three opinions.
For the topic you choose: 1. Support your ideas with specific, illustrative examples. If there are questions or points associated with your chosen
2. Hold a meeting among all team members and coaches to communicate honestly and openly in order to find and solve the problems especially
Evaluate pros and cons of each alternative and suggest a course of action to your CEO.