Managing City Benefits Case Study

1126 Words5 Pages
Managing City Benefits Case Study The interim human resources director and city manager of the city have been placed in a challenging predicament. With numerous forces pulling in opposite directions, making the right choices can become confusing. In this case, the mayor of the city is pushing for budget cuts and is even welcoming the idea of privatizing various public services. By switching to a private insurance system the mayor will be pleased, however the employees and unions will not be pleased. Though the city does not need to please the employees and can implement whatever policy they want, that does not suggest that they should not consider the implications it holds for their employees. By ignoring the needs and wishes of the workers, motivation and morale can decrease, and the possibility of a strike may even exist. Though the city planner and human resources director have made their decisions by choosing a private insurance company, there are several tools at their disposal that they can utilize to continue to motivate employees and implement this latest adjustment to health benefits without terrible backlash. As mentioned, all is not lost for the managers since they can still impact employee motivation even though they are not thrilled with reference to their benefit plans being changed. The managers can utilize Frederick Herzberg’s satisfiers and dissatisfiers in the job to continue to motivate employees. The five factors associated with job satisfaction
Open Document