Essay on Managing Energy Sources

) One of the most distinct advantages according to the article Is that It's a locally generated drought-proof supply of water. Another advantage would be that the production of recycled water is energy-efficient as it can be produced for about half the energy required to import water and approximately a third of the amount of energy needed to desalinate sea water. This energy-efficiency can also generate other advantages of reducing costs of importing water and avoiding the environmental effects of ocean desalination. In addition , according to WateReuse Association "purified wastewater could provide enough potable water to supply all municipal needs for more than 8 million people, or roughly one-fifth of California's projected population for 2020".

Based upon our analysis, and experience gained from other industries, we project that 50% of this cost will be recouped within the first five years after project completion. After that, the expected cost benefits will be between 5%-10% savings per year over current processes.

The Go Green Initiative WBS dictionary as shown in Chart 2, contains information pertaining to each work package. It is important that the project team review the dictionary for accuracy as the project progresses.

It is cold here! For 8 months out of the year, our low temperatures don't get out of the 40's at night, making for cold rooms and cold houses.

The Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County have devised a system to provide wastewater management and have implanted ways to recycle a lot of this water. The three treatments are

If residents and corporations throughout the United States continue to frivolously waste water and refuse to make painless changes and upgrades around their homes, it will continue to increase in cost to people across the United States. For example, as a result of the water shortage crisis currently afflicting the southwestern United States, the city of San Diego, California, is currently constructing a desalination plant, located in Carlsbad, California. The idea of a desalination plant is to collect undrinkable saltwater from the ocean and, using reverse osmosis and other filtering techniques, remove the salt to produce clean, potable water (Barnett). However, there are many downsides to relying on desalination practices to provide for a city the size of San Diego. First and foremost, it is considerably more expensive to produce clean drinking water from saltwater as opposed to using regular surface water or groundwater. The act of filtering the water alone can be twice as expensive as traditional filtration methods. In addition, desalination plants consume much more energy than traditional treatment plants, mostly due to the fact that the filtration methods are much more involved. Desalination consumes twice as much power as recycled plants, and four times as much as pumping groundwater (Newell, Roohk and Reardon). For example, the Carlsbad plant alone will require the same amount of electricity as is used to power 125,000 homes in California. However, the biggest

I enjoyed reading your post. I appreciate your mention of Glenwood Park in Atlanta, Georgia. Glenwood Park was founded in 2003 and sustainably consists of thousands of pounds of reused and salvaged materials. Green Street has salvaged and reused 259,200,000 lbs of concrete, 800,000 lbs of granite ruble blocks, 30,000,000 lbs of wood chips (An Earthcraft Community, 2003). The wood chips were converted to energy via a waste to energy plan that produced enough energy to power 1355 homes for a year (An Earthcraft Community, 2003). In addition, Glenwood Park harvests about 35,000 gallons of water per week from well water to irrigate street trees and central parks (An Earthcraft Community, 2003). Using the well water reduces the amount

A cost analysis has been performed for Scotts Miracle-Gro using the location of Temecula, CA and the estimated usage of 8,000,000 kWh’s of electricity per year.

With failure costs some of the costs would be equipment break downs and spills. Our equipment costs 3 million dollars so we don’t want to replace it for at least 10 years. The routine maintenance for the equipment is $500,000 a year. The cost for the spills is a total of $120,000 a year. That includes $50,000 for the training classes on spill prevention and $70,000 for the salary of two new spill prevention workers.

The project shall install wastewater treatment system. The wastewater shall be treated to meet the effluent standard, then discharging out of the power plant and shall be connected by OWNER at 1m out of boundary of the power plant.

The Western Treatment plant measures at 10,500 Hectares and is a world leader in technical and environmental innovation. It takes in around half of Melbourne’s water and produces almost 40 billion litres of recycled water. The plant was constructed in 1888. Prior to this, disposing human waste was extremely basic. Sewage would be collected and dumped into water ways such as the Yarra and Hobsons Bay. The idea was to construct a system of pipes, sewers and drains built underground to carry sewage from homes and factories to a sewage treatment farm.

Although it is hard to see a brewery that would not benefit from PurposeEnergy system, it is not a project easy to expand due to the large cost of implantation. The second one on Dellaware did not have its construction cost divulged, but the one on Vermont cost 4 million dollars (CBS News, 2011).

Metalworking fluid concentrate average cost is $5.68/gallon and it serves for 25 gallons. So for 50 gallons this would cost $11.36. Kathon MXW would cost $2per packet and for 50 gallons it would cost $4. The waste disposal per gallon is $1.36. This is diluted liquid and so for 50 gallons it would cost $68.So the total cost for consumer would be $83.36 per machine. So for 22 machines the total cost is $1833.92.

in 1000 kilogram batches. Each batch would require 60 direct labor hours and the following

An electrical master plan study was carried out and identified issues that need to be addressed as part of the Plant upgrades. The Board developed its first comprehensive Risk Review in 2014. There were thirty five risks identified which could impact the Plant’s ability to produce and transmit water to its customers. Of these risks, the probability and consequence varied. The top ten risks, which range from an overall medium to high risk rating, have been reviewed in greater detail and can be mitigated through the operating budget, capital budget or the unfunded program of work.