Steve was a young man when he was drafted into the military. He was sent to Vietnam to fight for American freedom, interests, and those who could not fight for themselves. While he was still a young man, he learned much from the experience and has earned respect from many people for his sacrifices. Thus, the United States should have a mandatory draft, not just for this reason but also including the assurance of national security, the reduction of unemployment, and it enables citizens from all walks of life to serve and see where this country’s freedom comes from.
As stated above, mandatory draft assures national security. This is shown throughout history. The Vietnam War was one prime example. A draft was enabled sending many young men to
The United States should reinstitute the military draft because there are three major problems found already by not reinstituting it: Increased health issues, increased broken family units and decreased national security. The advantages to reinstituting the military draft are: decreased health issues, decreased broken family units and increased national security.
Congress resulted to creating the draft because during World War One America had less soldiers than that of Romania. Romania only had one hundred seventy-four thousand men (Face of Battle, 2007). Congress had to make up for time so Congress federalized the National Guard of the United States. Families were scared that their loved ones would not make it back to America, but for some men proudness arose. Although, men could be deferred from the draft if the men met specific classifications.
The draft was reinstated in WWII and used when needed until after the Vietnam War. Now, the U.S. uses an All-Volunteer force, meaning individuals enlist in the military on their own terms. The U.S. should bring back the draft to lower PTSD rates, build the character of U.S. citizens and raise the military in times of need. One reason why the U.S. should bring back the draft
The draft is a process when the government forces young people to join the military and they no longer have a choice. The U.S military should not bring back the draft because it is a violation of human rights, and unfair to those that do not want to be in the military. For instance, forcing
A nation as a whole is only as strong as its military. It has been stated that, “in order to defend themselves from external threats, nations assemble militaries that are tasked with preserving national security”(Military Draft 1). The method chosen by United States to assemble a military force has been the subject of ethical debates since the introduction of the military draft in 1861, during the Civil War. Dictionary.com defines ethical as something, “being in accordance with the rules or standards for right conduct or practice”(1). A thorough investigation finds that there are three major ethical dilemmas that are often debated pertaining to the military draft. These dilemmas include the draft’s effect on civic pride, the disproportionate number of minorities, and the strength of the military.
It may also make us more apposing. Most countries would not want to go to war with an army of 300 million plus. That would help us get out of wars like we are in with smaller countries like Iraq and Afghanistan. The draft would upgrade the quality of the U.S military recruitments (Military Conscription, Recruiting and the Draft).
The United States should not bring back mandatory military service, also known as “the draft”. I personally am not supportive of the draft due to many issues including health and mental concerns brought about by the war. These concerns include Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), Depression, and Substance Abuse, just to name a few. I also feel that the education of the soldiers would be limited because after age 18, most people go to college. Age 18 is also the age males must enlist for the draft. If I were forced into the Army due to a draft, I wouldn’t have the opportunity to live life to the fullest. For instance, if a soldier was severely injured, the injury would affect the way that person would of live the rest of their life. The injury could even potentially cut the person’s life short. The mental health, physical health, education, and life in general should be taken into consideration before the United States sends young men and women out to war. These diseases are very harmful and we should think about others not just ourselves.
When looking at the whole picture, and deciding the pro’s and con’s of the military draft I have one final are for you to look at. Currently our armed forces are voluntary and do not accurately represent the American population. With the ideal draft system in place, it will allow for individuals from all aspects of society to represent and provide their service to our country. Along with proper representation, the military cost would be lowered. Although the armed forces would have to pay individuals more and the additional cost of food, equipment, and other essential needs would go up the, the cost of recruiting, advertising and additional benefits to lure persons into the recruiting
A current draft would, in the same way, affect many immigrated Canadians. Canadian immigrants are often working as "unskilled" laborers, sometimes with little access to education, and using their earnings to better themselves as well as send money back to their family. This puts them in the range of individuals who do not have education or excess money to avoid draft. Many of these individuals are providing for large extended families, as well as their own children. This sort of draft would prohibit these families from leaving poverty and, thereby, economically offer less taxes to the government. Volunteered forces, in contrast, would allow the military to be made up more of single men or women and more financially stable
After World War two the draft was no longer a option for the American Army. Compulsory conscription is today’s version of the draft, and the draft played a large part in World War two. Over seventy percent of men that were the between the ages of 18 and 35 were in the army and because of all the time they spent together and their similar ages many of these guys became lifelong friends. Since world war two the only tragedy that has brought our people together as a nation was the 9/11 terrorists attacks. The difference between todays army and the traditional army is the participation.
Draft would be a nuisance to the country’s economy. The reinstitution would result in major costs and damages to the country’s workforce. For example, as argued by Bruce Chapman, an author and known opponent to the draft, the drafting of recruits would cost more than maintaining the current all-volunteer system upheld by the U.S. military (Text 1, line 84). Bruce Chapman states that the cost of each drafted serviceman “would be more like $27,000 to $30,000” in contrast to an estimated $20,000 by the pro-draft Robert Litan (Text 1, line 103). The draft would result in an unnecessary amount of additional costs to the U.S. government, which should be avoided if possible. In addition to these direct costs, the draft would hurt the amount of American specialized labor. As mentioned in Text 2 by Bill Maxwell, the country’s youth are opting to attend college rather than enlist in the military (Text 2, line 36). Reinstituting the draft would call for pulling large numbers of college-age Americans out of civilian life and forcing them into the military. This not only interrupts the education of millions of people, but it would also contribute to a labor shortage. The country would be short of millions of workers, and the disruption of their college education could only further complicate the shortage of skilled labor in the U.S., which is still severe (Text 1, line 115). The draft would be a burden in costs and unintended economic
Various Americans are addressing whether the draft remains critical in the 21st century. Today's U.S. military is by and large seen as the most built up, the most serious, the best-drove, and the most fit military on the planet. The all volunteer imperative has shown both successful and adaptable since it was set up in 1973, to consolidate the harshest test up to this point of its capacities the latest 15 years of wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Despite the weights of reiterated associations to significantly asking for the fight to come circumstances, it remained for the most part all around controlled and convincing. A couple of people from Congress assume this astounding execution infers that the United States should annul the draft. Rep. Mike
It was a windy, stormy day. The date was November 3rd and that meant one thing. War. The civil war football game, of course, which is an annual tradition in which the University of Oregon takes on Oregon State University. The game is usually highly anticipated and intense. Nobody knows that more than me. I sit in the south end zone on the top right corner. I flash a fluorescent orange color but I am often overlooked. I am proudly one of the few Oregon Duck pylons that are used at Autzen stadium every game. It should have been a blowout considering the ducks were 10-2 coming into the game, and the beavers were coming in with a 5 game losing streak. However, this game was no ordinary blowout.
Conscription, or more boldly the draft, has not been in place for some thirty years. While some people cringe at the thought of reinstating the draft, others have different views. This short paper will speak of those different views and the reasons why conscription of military service may not be such a bad idea after all.
Steve feels an obligation to his country, to his fellow man, that his body initially doesn't allow him to fulfill, but that doesn't stop him from trying. One might imagine that this is due to his mother and father's influence in his life -- both of them set aside their lives in the hopes of making life better for others. His mother was a nurse in a TB ward, and his father died of mustard gas in World War I. Due to these two influences, as well as his own intrinsic sense of moral obligation, Steve feels compelled to fight in World War II, despite the fact that he is, by all measures, completely unsuited for it. As the doctor at the beginning of Captain America: The First Avenger states, Steve would be ineligible for service based on his asthma alone -- but that doesn't stop him from trying to enlist five times. While there is an element of having something to prove to the world -- Steve's illness throughout his life and society's reaction to it has left him with a chip on his shoulder a mile wide -- he also just plain wants to help, because he sees it as his moral obligation to. Now, Bucky says that there are important jobs on the home front, and Steve could do any one of them, but Steve denies this, saying "There are men laying down their lives. I've got no right to do any less than them." Nearly 70 years later, Steve is called back into service just over two weeks after having been pulled out of the ice, and he goes without a complaint, even though he's still adjusting to the reality of his new world. Steve's own mental well-being is less important than his obligation to the rest of the world. Two years after that, when Steve is forced to fight his best friend, he begins by asking Bucky not to make him do it -- and then fights him anyway, because Bucky is standing between him and his avenue to save the world, and Steve's duty to the world is more important than his own