Mandatory Drug Testing Research Paper

Mandatory Drug testing within schools reverses the legal principle of innocent until proven guilty and also violates the Fourth and Fifth Amendments of the Constitution. Without suspicion of drug use, there is no probable cause to test student-athletes for drugs, thus violating the Fourth Amendment right to be free from unlawful searches. Drug testing student-athletes without acquiring sufficient evidence to base accusations on, is essentially asking them to provide the evidence of their own guilt which violates the Fifth Amendment right to protect

For decades, one of the most controversial debate topics has been whether random drug testing in high schools is justified. I St. Andrews Collage is one of the schools that participates in unannounced drug testing to monitor that the boys do not stray off track. In order to be accepted into the school, you must sign a form that says at any point in your years at the school, the school may be able to drug test you if they feel required. If any of the students test positive during their drug tests, that student will be expelled from the school. Personally, I find drug testing within high school an extreme invasion of privacy and I believe

The research policy that will be discussed in this paper is on the issues of mandatory drug screening in shelters. Emergency shelters are opening up their doors to the admission of any individual or family that shows up at shelters by offering nutritious meals and a warm safe place to sleep away from the dangers that lurks the streets. The emergency shelters offer residents a temporary residence for those who are homeless, disaster relief victims or fleeing from domestic violence. Women Against Abuse (WAA) is an organization that serves a diverse population and does not discriminate against anyone. There are no standards that would turn a woman away from seeking shelter from their abusive partner (Women Against Abuse, 2015).

The state spent $493,000 on drug testing for this fiscal year. It received 32,511 welfare applications and referred 636 for drug testing. Only twenty came back positive, although nearly two hundred people refused to comply. But even if all 200 were drug users, that still comes to more than $2,200 per positive result, which is more expensive than the median benefit in the state. (Benen 1)

To begin with, it is an invasion of privacy to the students at the school. It is their business, and the school administrators do not need to be invading the privacy of what kids/young adults are contributing to outside of school. I for one would not want anyone, (especially school administrators) invading my personal privacy, exactly why drug testing should not be allowed in public schools.

Drug-testing applicants, as well as recipients, on welfare has been an ongoing debate for multiple years. Many have argued that if an individual has to be tested to get a paycheck, others should be tested and screened to receive a federal check of financial aid. Those individuals who are recipients of the welfare program should be drug-tested nationwide to eliminate the problematic spending of taxpayer dollars. Since 1971, this type of testing has been used for military purposes, in the work force, and has recently been incorporated into state welfare laws. With this addition, controversial topics, such as how these tests are paid for and whether or not they violate the fourth amendment as an unlawful search, have arose. Although, they have

According to the New York Times great athletes were involved in drug unethical behavior over the past ten years. This brought a big attention to the schools across the nation to start drug testing student athletes. Giving this some thought school's drug testing students is a great idea.

When examining the issue of poverty, stakeholders such as the NAATP value self-sufficiency and economic prosperity. Therefore, the second major argument they make claims that the poverty rate would decrease quicker if drug users and welfare abusers are weeded-out by way of mandatory drug testing. They argue that the drug tests would encourage lower-class citizens and citizens in poverty to refrain from illegal drug usage and bring about a more economically stable lifestyle. Their argument is embedded in long term monetary goals rather than short-term cost effectiveness. Evidence is provided through a study on the 24,471 applicants for "Families First" which is Tennessee’s version of the TANF program. This study was conducted in 2015, and a

Many schools have paid for drug tests should they continue to have them? Everyday teenagers are giving into more and more peer pressure, which results in doing drugs, but testing the students for drugs could potentially prevent them doing drugs in the future. Drug testing students allows them to have a successful future, keeping a drug free environment, and helps prevent mental illness.

“In 2012, roughly one-fifth of the U.S. population, or 52.2 million people, received some kind of means-tested public assistance every month” (Elliott). With 20% of the U.S. population receiving welfare it is the government’s responsibility to regulate is receiving the assistance. Welfare recipients should be required to take a required drug test to receive any benefits because it is a waste of taxpayer dollars. It is the government's responsibility to find out who are using drugs so they can help the recipient function on their own.

Why would you take a drug test if you have never touched drugs in your life? This is a question that many parents seem to be asking at schools all around the country. Many parents think that it is unfair that students who play sports must have their privacy invaded. I believe that drug testing in schools is unnecessary because it is expensive and a waste of money for schools, it is not effective, and it is not constitutional.

Mandatory drug and alcohol testing programs for employees in positions that hold a bearing on the safety of others have been a controversial topic since their inception. While there are multiple arguments that can be made for and against these programs, it has been proven time and time again that these tests are not worth the costs, nor are they justifiable for the company. Drug and alcohol testing can be humiliating, a violation of human rights, and has a history of causing a rift in the relationships between management and lower level employees in certain companies. Mandatory testing policies for employees who hold positions that have a bearing of safety on others is financially irresponsible, ruins trust between employees and their superiors,

Had I been on the board making the decision concerning random drug testing for athletes and those with parking passes I would have probably voted for the testing. I don’t believe all high school students are doing drugs, but I do think the student athletes should be tested for drugs for their safety as well as the safety of other. Collegiate and professional athletes are tested. As for those with parking passes, they too should be tested because they will be driving on school grounds and no matter what the school has some liability. I can see why some people argue that only a select group are being targeted and those who do not take drugs may feel uncomfortable but has to do with safety. As for the parent that said, schools educate and parents parent has no understanding that it takes everyone to raise a child. An example of a case relating to drug testing ;Board of Education v. Earls, 122 S.Ct. 2559 (2002) The Supreme Court held constitutional an Oklahoma school policy of randomly drug testing students who participate in competitive, non-athletic extracurricular activities. In reversing a federal court ruling, the 5-4 Court stated in its majority opinion that it found such a policy "a reasonably effective means of addressing the school district's legitimate concerns in preventing, deterring and detecting drug use.

Is mandatory drug testing for organizations an invasion of privacy for citizens? A discussion surfaced around questioning whether mandatory drug testing in workplace is a privacy invasion or help improve safety. The implementation mandatory drug testing is vital and beneficial to the society.

In my opinion I believe every school has their set of rules. The students should have random search for illegal substance for those students that have extracurricular activity should be require to do the drug testing for their own health. Especially for those that drive to school they can cause accidents. It’s better to have the students tested to be on the safe side. Also why have students that want to learn in school and get a better education would suffer for those that do drugs an act a fool. I mean having good health why throw it to the trash when you can become someone in life.