Mandatory Drug Testing Research Paper

There is no reason people can not get a job in today's world and make their own money because workplaces have become more safe and less physically stressful. One of the goals of welfare is to create stable homes but it tends to do the opposite because if there are two incomes then they can not receive financial aid, therefore it splits up families. Welfare can also result in a pattern of dependence on the government and will cause people to not go out and get a job because they do not want to get their federal aid taken away. A good thing is that states have the ability to set all of their own welfare rules, including getting rid of programs that are useless. Most states offer basic aid such as healthcare, food stamps, child care assistance, unemployment, cash aid, and housing assistance but everyone of those aids can be taken care of by going out and actually working for money versus sitting on the couch and living off of the hardworking taxpayers

Welfare recipients should not be required to pass a monthly drug test before receiving their benefits because welfare and drug tested do not have anything in common, they have different meanings, and drug test should only be for people who are addicted to drugs.

One of the many goals of the American Welfare System is to provide financial assistance to U.S citizens who are unable to support themselves. Government funds are provided in hopes that many of these able bodied citizens will eventually find a way to become financially independent and economically productive. However, there is a percentage of welfare recipients that use their government funding to purchase and abuse illicit drugs. When welfare is abused in this manner, the system loses credibility and the long-term goals of seeing financially self-sufficient citizens, and economic progress on both micro and macro levels, are not only compromised, they are regressed by the negative impacts of illegal drug use. The most common (and commonly debated) method of weeding out citizens who choose to abuse the welfare system is enforcing mandatory drug testing on all welfare recipients. This method is an ongoing controversy involving elements of legality, economics, budget analysis, a violation of rights, the allocation of government funds, and discriminatory stereotypes of welfare recipients. Regardless of the diverse array of fundamental complexities involved with executing or rejecting this preventative procedure, most Americans’ opinions are simply based

In today’s workplace or office it is nearly guaranteed that you will have drug tested to continue working there and receiving your weekly check. As of 2014 58% of companies admitted to drug and alcohol testing. Those numbers jumped up to 62% when those companies have more than four thousand employees. If the person receiving welfare already has a job, then they will be added to the high number of people already being drug tested for other type of reason, so that means systems are already in place to put welfare recipients into those cycles also.

The Aid of welfare is important to society for those considered financially unstable. According to the United Stated Department of Human Services, there are over 12 million citizen receiving welfare. The states of Alabama, Mississippi,Arkansas, Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Utah, West Virginia and Wisconsin require drug testing in order to receive welfare. Drug testing is not an effective way to detect drug use because many have found ways to get pass the testing. As we know welfare is supposedly to meet the human’s needs but not for the purchase and use of drugs. Some says that drug test to receive assistance is unconstitutional and unfair, others believe it would be safe if child with parent who uses drugs. By randomly drug testing, those who receive assistance would help deter drug use, decrease unemployment rate, and potential savings for taxpayers.

People who apply for welfare benefits should be tested for drugs and they should be cleared of all illicit drugs before they receive any benefits in the form of cash or food stamps because, the government spends so much money on welfare and rehabilitation programs and screening welfare recipients will help the government save more money to fix the economy. Most employees are tested of illicit drugs before they are employed by their employer so why shouldn’t welfare recipients also be tested of illicit drug before they receive any kind of assistance? The government deducts so much tax out of worker’s earnings of which part of these deductions go to fund welfare programs, therefore welfare assistance like cash should not be used to purchase

In the article titled “Should Colleges Be Allowed to Enforce Mandatory Drug Testing…” Linn State Technical College in Missouri implemented mandatory drug testing for all students as part of the general admissions process. Linn State Technical College explains their reasoning behind the drug testing as part of their mission to “prepare students for profitable employment and a life of learning”. Lawsuits have been filed against the college stating that the students Fourth Amendment rights have been violated. One of the main reasons school officials stand by the mandatory drug testing policy is for the students who are enrolled in programs that involve operating of heavy equipment.

I disagree with mandatory drug testing for students in public schools. I think it is the parent responsibility to have this done if they choose. In our book on page 68 under public schools and I quote, “With all the concern about drug use by athletes, the first groups of students to be widely subjected to urine screening for drugs were those involved in team sports. In a legal challenge to this process, the U.S. Supreme Court in 1995 allowed drug testing of athletes, based partly on evidence from the school in questions that its student athletes were at a higher than average risk for drug use. Many schools since have adopted policies that include other extracurricular activities, and a 2002 Supreme Court case upheld those programs as well.

One of my top two topics is drug testing in school under Schools and Education category. The school will get a student urine sample to detect if they use addictive illegal drugs such as cocaine, amphetamines, and marijuana. In 1995, two United States Supreme Court ruled to have a mandatory drug test in school especially those students who are involved in sports to protect them and prevent them from getting involved in illegal drugs. The United States Supreme Court pointed out that this procedure doesn’t violate the constitution. Under points, they say no to mandatory drug testing in schools because it is unconstitutional and in an effective way to stop teenagers drug usage. They added that drug testing violates student’s privacy. There are

(Lambardo Vision Launch, web.). It could prevent illicit drug use in the poverty class, and it is a normal part of life. By removing drug abusers from the welfare program there is a potential to save millions of dollars every year. In Utah, although only a small number tested positive, if there would have been no drug test the state would have handed away more than 350,000 dollars worth to welfare recipients who use drugs through the year. (Price, Deseretnews.com, web.). Utah’s law also doesn’t disqualify people who test positive, instead it requires them to enter substance abuse treatments. By requiring drug testing for welfare it could stop people from getting on drugs in the first place. Lombardo’s main point is many people are required to take a drug test to gain employment and a reular pay so that in turn should be required for welfare applicants as well.

Is mandatory drug testing for organizations an invasion of privacy for citizens? A discussion surfaced around questioning whether mandatory drug testing in workplace is a privacy invasion or help improve safety. The implementation mandatory drug testing is vital and beneficial to the society.

There is concern in New Zealand about the increasing usage of drugs of employees in the workplace. The issue on whether the random drug testing of employees should be mandatory has embarked heated controversy in the nation.

Workplace drug testing is important from the perspective of employees as well as employer as it benefits both. Studies show that there are beneficial results at workplace. This article discusses briefly the benefits of this measure.

Many people feel the remaining employees are being held to a higher standard than those on welfare. The American Civil Liberties Union has declared mandatory drug testing by the federal government on welfare recipients intrudes on the rights of poor citizens. Yet, most working class citizens have to take drug tests in order to maintain employment. Nearly every profession in the private sector requires drug testing. New hires at

Depending on the state, laws have been implemented that penalize those who fail the drug tests. Governments are hoping that the penalties are a enough of an incentive to stay away from using drugs. The law also states that there is a lifetime ban on welfare and SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program), which was formerly known as Food Stamps that can be modified by the states. (ASPE 3). What this means, for example, is that one state can change the law to say you are only restricted from Welfare and SNAP for two years, while other states could choose to make it longer or shorter. As of now, there are no states that are using the lifetime ban (ASPE 3). Although the federal law states there should be a lifetime ban,