Monica Frackowiak
Rhetoric-101-070
Draft
Why is required school uniforms always discussed in low income areas vs. medium or high income areas? The fact that required uniforms are well established in low income areas is like a double edged sword.According to the “Encyclopedia of clothing and fashion” The public first became aware of “dress codes in schools in the 1950’s,(girl's prohibited from wearing pants, had to wear skirts or dresses).During the 1960’s,blue jeans, black leather jackets, and other accoutrements associated with gangs were prohibited among boys(and, of course girls, as well). By the 1980’s, problems with gang violence led to dress codes that attempted to do away with gang colors. Dress codes have routinely been used to prohibit
…show more content…
The requirement of uniforms help implement guidlines for students,once guidlines and rules are followed schools and students overall performence will increase. is gonna stop them from focusing on their studies.To be sure the Cps workers are not only the mainly affected, it is the children of our future that is constantly being affected by these state budget cuts.Cps has been under fire for constantly going on strikes or cutting budgets for low income areas.”According to Lauren Fitzpatrick,Cps officials had taken away half of each principal's remaining discretionary funds, saying the move would save 46 million as the school systems makes up for 215 million it had counted on in vain from state government”.”The money pays for school supplies, field trips, recess monitors and other various needs.”Claypool has blamed the cuts on a December veto by Rauner of legislation that would have given 215 million in aid to cps to help cover a legally mandated payment for school pensions. Rauner has said the money was contingent on more wide reaching government pension reforms that never happened.”School …show more content…
middle to higher income areas due to the fact that that these middle to higher income areas realize that required school uniforms is the last thing that they are worried about, these districts have more complicated issues they have to take head on. There are issues that have to be addressed in a certain order, having to worry about a required uniform for the students are the last thing they are worried about. The reasons for required school uniforms in low income areas vs. medium or high income areas may surprise you, such as the fact that these low income areas are low performing.Yes,required dress code policies, implement benefits and advantages to Cps students such as deterring them from getting in the middle of violence to reducing bullying, peer pressure. Yet the implementation of school uniforms in low income areas has no actual evidence of helping students academically. Changing the requirement for school uniforms for Cps students guide students to focus more on their studies, showing students uniforms will not form their
Why are required school uniforms always discussed in low income areas vs. medium or high income areas? The fact that required uniforms are well established in low income areas.The question is why are required uniforms so popular in low income areas?Will require school uniforms in low income areas in Chicago drive students to become more successful? It seems that there are no reasons for middle/higher income areas to implement these required policies since there are a lower percent of “at risk” student bodies in the surrounding suburbs than the city.For example the main reason why middle to higher income areas are not implementing required school uniforms and policies in their district?due to the fact that these middle to higher income
According to an article I read, almost 60 percent of schools in the U.S have a strict dress code and 23 percent of schools require a uniform (1,300,000,000 schools). The number of public schools requiring students to a wear school uniform increased from 13% during the 2003-2004 school year to 19% during the 2011-2012 school year (National Center for Education Statistics). Schools that require a uniform are mainly found in high poverty areas.
School uniforms are beneficial and have proven to be a strong deterrent against gang violence, dress code violation and have a significant impact on instructional time as a result of less focus on nonacademic issues such as student attire. We believe that a mandatory school uniform policy will provide a more secure school environment, promote an atmosphere for greater discipline, and increase-learning opportunities for students by removing many of the distractions associated with various types of clothing; however, a grant request for $25,000 to purchase additional uniforms for students who are economically disadvantaged was rejected. The exact reason why the grant proposal was rejected was not clear. Mann (2015) asserts that there are
Moreover, parents are affected by the school uniform policy as well. The public school system paid for by American tax dollars, and it is unfair to saddle parents with the responsibility to purchase additional clothing to meet school uniform policy requirements. Due to the current state of the economy, parents are looking for a way to stretch their dollars, not additional expenses on top
One main reason public schools have uniforms / dress code is because in 1996, President Clinton allowed the school uniform movement and said, “If it means teenagers will stop killing each other over designer jackets, then our public schools should be able to require their students to wear school uniforms.” This gave schools the power to control the
However, this statistic varies from district to district and largely depends on what type of area this occurs in (Draa 159). Uniform policies are most common in urban areas where kids are likely to drop out or skip due to their affiliation with gangs. The type of clothing you where is integral to gang culture so it’s harder to recruit new members if you can’t even wear your colors. Additionally, students are able to better focus on their school work instead of being preoccupied with what they’re wearing that day for school. Uniforms also make it a lot easier for the student to get dressed for school since they’re not worried about what outfit they need to put together.
Urban school districts have been making the switch to school uniforms at an ever increasing rate. According to The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) website, “Between the 2003–04 and 2011–12 school years, the percentage of public schools reporting that they required that students wear uniforms increased from 13 to 19 percent” (NCES, 2014). Meanwhile, suburban school districts have been slower to make the move to uniforms. NECS reports that “47 percent of high-poverty public schools reported requiring school uniforms, compared to 6 percent of low poverty public schools” (NCES, 2014). The movement supporting school uniforms in urban public schools largely began with the Long Beach Unified School District (LBUSD), who at the start of
These schools do not have gangs or violence, so the school uniforms are not really changing much. However, in areas that do have a large number of gangs and violent crimes, such as big city public schools, a dress code is not being adopted. These clothing related crimes are mostly seen in a high crime area, yet nothing is being done to solve these problems.
School uniforms were first implemented in the late 1990s and were used for the schooling of minorities, specifically Native American women (Dussel, 2006). In 1996, the US Department of Education reported that only three percent of public schools mandated uniforms. As a result of the belief that uniforms make schoolrooms more orderly and disciplined, President Clinton encouraged schools to adopt uniforms (Gentile et al.,2012). Shortly after, uniforms were widely adopted in urban communities to counterbalance students wearing gang colors or being identified as poor. Since urban communities have often been stigmatized with narratives that are colored by violence, many of the current research studies associated with uniforms focus on the relationship between uniforms and misbehaviors, attendance, and teacher retention.
The first point of why all public schools should adopt a school uniform policy is uniforms save the family money. In 1999 the NPD group conducted a survey and found that families whose children went to a school with a uniform policy spent $85 less than families whose children did not. (Pike, 1999). This is sixteen years later after that survey was conducted so the figure today will be in the hundreds as status symbol clothes prices are on the rise every year. There
The idea of uniforms being required for public school students has been a widely controversial topic in the recent past. In the 2003-2004 school year, only one in eight public schools required students to wear uniforms (ProConorg Headlines). In the 2013-2014 school year, one in five public schools required students to wear uniforms (ProConorg Headlines). This essay will discuss the reasons that uniforms restrict the individuality of students, burdens families that cannot afford two sets of clothes for each of their children (Farrell), and serve little to none purpose in benefitting the education of students. Uniforms are meant for the workforce, not school children.
When students wear uniforms, students do not improve in any way. Student’s academic scores do not go higher when they wear a uniform. Researcher Virginia Draa found that “implementing a uniform policy in schools did not have any impact on academic performance”. If schools are hoping for their student’s academic scores to go higher by implementing uniforms, they would be better off without uniforms. Wearing uniforms don’t help a student’s attitude. A 2010 study in a large urban school district in the Southwest found that asking students to wear uniforms did not result in any change in the number of suspensions for elementary school students. Student’s behavior won’t change, if schools wanted to implement uniform. Uniforms don’t have any positive impact on students,
The debate about public school uniforms in America is an issue that has been around for a very long time. This issue was even mentioned by President Bill Clinton in a previous State of the Union address in 1996. In his 1996 State of the Union Address, President Clinton decreed,” I challenge all of our schools to teach character education, to teach good values and good citizenship and if it means that teenagers will stop killing each other over designer jackets, then our public schools should be able to require their students to wear school uniforms” (Clinton 1996). Public schools requiring mandatory uniforms for their students are a major topic as it deals with moral and economic concerns about how America’s public schools are operated.
Uniforms in schools are a big debate around the world. Should we have uniforms in schools? The answer is yes because uniform help the schools. They bring to table a great deal of help because students are getting bullied, killed, and some may not have as much as other when shopping for clothes. Having uniforms bring safety to schools and what goes on after school.
School systems have debated for years if they should make school uniforms mandatory for all students. Some parents do not want school systems to mandate uniforms due to pressure from their children to be able to maintain their individuality through clothing, while other parents prefer uniforms to reduce spending money on name brand school clothes and to minimize associations with gangs. More school systems across the United States of America are going to uniforms from grades one through twelve where students are still impressionable by their peers. I believe public schools should require students to wear school uniforms to help parents save money in these hard economic times, to limit the number of incidents of violence in the school systems due to gangs and gang associates such as colors, and to prepare students for the job force after school where some places make it mandatory to wear uniforms to work every day.