Marie Antoinette Essay

Marie Antoinette embodied the negative aspects of the French monarchy because from the start of her reign she was a traitor. She had Austria’s interests at heart by putting the country she ruled last and putting others first even if it coincided with the those of France, the country she supposedly ruled.

After a few years, they manage to have children. Marie Antoinette wanted the French people to

First, the queen was an unwelcome guest in French people’s eyes. Marie-Antoinette was treated as a scapegoat due to her gender and the French people’s fear of

At the age of 20, Louis XVI was immature and required self-confidence. He desired to be a good king, but he faced colossal debt and rising resentment towards an absolute monarchy. His failure to victoriously address serious financial problems would pursue him for most of his reign. Louis lacked enough strength of character and decisiveness to fight the influence of court or give support to advocates in their attempt to improve France's government. But, Marie Antoinette was not much of help for Louis. In the 1780, Marie Antoinette began spending more time at her private castle, the Petit Trianon, which was on the Palace of Versailles and obviously almost always without Louis. Also she was wasting money on gowns and gambling. Around this time the first rumors appear about her relationship with Swedish diplomat Count Axel von Fersen. During the 1780s, with the French government falling into financial problems and poor intake of grain prices across the country, the extravagant lifestyle of Marie Antoinette rapidly became the topic of popular annoyance. Endless pamphlets accused the queen of ignorance, extravagance and adultery, some with indecent cartoons and others calling her "Madame

The Holocaust had various effects on millions of Jews. Anne Frank’s experience differed from other experiences Jewish children had. At the same time, however, there were common factors in each of their lives. From their way of living to emotional consequences, the Holocaust was a difficult situation for all of these children.

"Let them eat cake" is probably one of the most recited quotes around the world, which is known to be spoken by the last Queen of France, Marie Antoinette. Although often reffered to as "The Party Queen" or in other words, the Queen who danced while her people starved. But what many fail to recognize is the fact that Marie Antoinette was the Queen who cared for her people. The only think she cared for more than the welfare of her people, was the welfare of her children. In order for one to understand and have the ability to fully understand the French

The future Queen of France was born on All Souls' Day, 2nd November, 1755, in Vienna as the youngest daughter of Maria Theresa and the Emperor Franz Stephan. She was baptized under the names Maria Antonia Josepha Johanna. A glorious future seemed to await the little Archduchess. Not only would she grow up in the bosom of a large and affectionate family, but from the very beginning her mother intended to marry her youngest daughter to the glittering Crown of France. The traditional marriage politics of the Habsburgs would secure her beloved daughter a brilliant position and help guarantee the peace and stability of Europe at the same time.

Have you ever wondered about the quote “Let them eat cake”? Marie Antoinette was the queen of France. She loved to spend money on anything, she didn’t need. He always wanted to look perfect and be perfect.

What critics fail to recognize is that the anachronism modernizes the film to reflect the values of society today. Coppola’s willful ignorance of accurate history allows the audience to emphasize with a victimized portrayal of Marie Antoinette. As a naïve wild child stuck in a state of loneliness, Coppola highlights themes of individualism and self-identity to create a relatable coming of age story out of a notorious historical figure. Coming of age stories have been popular within past four decades because of their “[link]… to identity development” that society values (Lewis). Camera angles, music, and anachronism form an intimate experience created in order for the audience to form a connection with Marie Antoinette. Sofia Coppola’s choice to humanize Marie Antoinette expands on the idea that society overlooks and allows corruption taking place in society. There are people that we give the “Coppola effect” of neglecting the harsh truth of reality. The real Queen of France shares some of the same values of famous figures today: extravagance and rebellion. The fact of the matter is if we as a society continue neglecting the truth, these immoral values will continue to be reflected in our culture and won’t be trumped by

The holocaust was a horrible time in people's lives and it killed six million people. Even though this happened to so many people Anne Frank was someone that so many people look up to because of her diary that she wrote during this time. Anne Frank, her family, and the Van Danns all spent 25 months in the secret annex. Dussel was someone that came in later so it was very tight for 8 people to be living under certain circumstances for that long. They hoped to stay hidden until they were liberated but they were caught and sadly the only one that lived through the concentration camps was Mr.Frank. Many historical events took place in Anne Frank. Even though most of these things occurred while they were in hiding, it still changed the characters mood and relationships.

Thesis: Marie Antoinette may have been queen at a young age, but it was certainly short lived. As a social, outgoing, and energetic young woman, she was completely different from her shy, inconsistent, pre-chosen husband. She spent an irrational amount of money that lead to her reputation’s ultimate downfall. As time went on the king and queen were captured and when they tried to escape, they would just be captured again. King Louis’ indecisiveness and Marie’s recklessness ultimately caused them their lives.

Have you ever been in a situation where you have to hide away from death? But eventually you will have to face it. In the story “Diary of Anne Frank” she and her family experienced pain throughout the holocaust. Although human growth involves pain, we can outcome bad things. Even though we experience bad things we can outcome them.

The holocaust is a sad event that happened in history. There were Jews who lost their lives because their religion was seen as a dangerous race to society. Many Jews lost their lives do to that judgement. This talks and goes on in the book The Diary Of Anne Frank. In the book the girl Anne Frank is very calm and collected in this time she said “In spite of everything, I still believe people are really good at heart. I believe that the quote is true. I say this because in the book they all had their days were they were all upset or sad, but other than that they all had a little happiness in them.

Marie Antoinette along with the people around her just represented everything that was wrong with the monarchy. They symbolize “all of the excesses of the reviled French monarchy” (Levack, Muir, & Veldman, 2011 p.629). The people were mad because they expected new ideas, reforms, and a fresh approach to governing France, but instead they were faced with King Louis XVI lost of interest in the government, and Marie Antoinette super social, gambling, partying late at night, and out of control spending lifestyle. Marie Antoinette might not have caused the French Revolution; however, her declining reputation and unique decision, made the citizens believe that the discreet of the old regiment its replacement were necessary for the salvation of France.

This film was a feel-good, relatable film. They took the history and turned it into a relatable film with showing the vulnerable side of Marie. The way we experience her “loneliness”, feeling of “not-belonging” makes the film be able to captivate the audience and grow a connection with the main character making it hard not to love. Many other critics feel the exact same way when it comes to this movie. They often questioned, “critical suspicion that the film is all ‘style’ with little ‘substance’.” Many believe that the style was there but the narrative and story is lacking tremendously. Overall the movie does touch upon some big historical points but not as much as it should to be classified as a historical movie.