Marijuana Legalization Case Study

Since 2012, four states in the US have allowed sale of cannabis for recreational use by adults over the age of 21. (Colorado, Alaska, Oregon, and Washington State). Washington State legalized growing of cannabis for personal use and legalized it for gifting to friends. In 2016, more states are considering legalization and within the next 4-5 years, half of the state will at least most likely to have proposed a bill talking about decriminalization or even legalization. In the paper it discusses the probable effects that will come with legalization and also the possible effects, along it also talks about the legalization of cannabis and how it affects the use of alcohol, tobacco and opioids, which can tend to be a lot more dangerous that cannabis. Study Method. This report aimed to briefly describe the regulatory regimes so far implemented; outline their plausible effects on cannabis use and cannabis-related harm; and suggest what research is needed to evaluate the public health impact of these policy changes. It reviewed the drug policy literature to identify: (1) plausible effects of legalizing adult recreational use on cannabis price and availability; (2) factors that may increase or limit these effects; (3) pointers from studies of the effects of legalizing medical cannabis use; and (4) indicators of cannabis use and cannabis-related harm that can be monitored to assess the effects of these policy changes. Study Findings. Legalization of recreational use will

Federal government has the power to control all the state local activities including the purely local that can have substantial effect on the interstate commerce. In the case of growing marijuana plant at home for personal consumption being for medical use, the federal government banning that marijuana sounds not right at first glance. The marijuana plants are grown within a state and the grower cultivates the plant for personal use and the situation sounds like no interstate commercial activities are involved or affected.

The legalization of marijuana in Colorado has created questions about the social responsibility. This issue continues to be controversial and one that has many angles to consider. The stakeholders include consumers, investors, children, farmers, and even hospitals. The moral and ethical implications include legal, economic, and philanthropic components. The selling of marijuana brings big benefits in tax dollars and generates revenue for the community. In 2014 and 2015, nearly $6 million in pot revenues have been distributed to local governments (Haun, 2015). Farmers now have a profitable crop that would create many jobs for the community. However, the social accountability would come in the form of the negative consequences that smokers and

The Supreme court on Monday declined to hear a lawsuit challenging Colorado’s legalization of recreational marijuana. The two neighboring states Nebraska and Oklahoma used a rare procedure to attack the law asking to allow them to file a lawsuit directly to the Supreme Court. This is allowed by the constitution to hear disputes between states but it is usually disputes about other things such as land or resources. In 2012 the voters of Colorado voted to change the state's constitution to regulate the sales and distributions of it and to allow it for recreational use.

Canada is known for the strongest Cannabis culture in the world, so two-third of the people want the law for marijuana to be legalised. On April 1st 2014, the government has introduced a new law for marijuana known as Marijuana for Medical Purpose Regulation (MMPR) which stated that all the patients should only buy marijuana from the licenced producers. However, the old law of Marijuana Medical Access Regulation (MMAR) stated that the patients can grow or anyone can grow on behalf of them.

The issue of marijuana enforcement was first addressed over one hundred years ago by the British Indian Hemp Drugs Commission. The commission concluded that cannabis prohibition was impractical, and that the best solution was to tax the drug to the greatest extent possible. This statement was released after years of failed attempts to prohibit marijuana, and successful attempts to generate revenue by taxing the crop. By analyzing myriads of research I was able to determine approximately how the economy would be affected on several different issues. Some figures that would be affected are: employment, the demand for marijuana, taxation rates and potential government revenue, incarceration and enforcement costs, and social issues such as rehabilitation

How does medicinal marijuana help those who need it you may ask? There was a huge case back in 2013 about a young eight-year old girl name Charlotte Figi who suffers from Dravet’s Syndrome or better known as myoclonic epilepsy in infants. (Stubblefield 345). This disease made Charlotte have over 300 seizures a week. After she started using marijuana her condition improved so well that her seizures dropped down to two to three times a month. Just like Twoquala Stevens, who had a mastectomy on her right breast after being diagnosed with Stage Two breast cancer in July 2011, she said, “I would still smoke marijuana even if it wasn’t legalized, because it helped relieve pain, alleviate nausea and increase my appetite.”(Hayes). Medicinal marijuana

The kiddies are likely to get burst feeding on the ducks! We expect visiting your grin! We fall in love with their own heart. Surviving at Midvale is like wise super reasonable. They truly are crucial into this local group and has to be noted.

When someone hears the word marijuana, they usually think one of two things: “That is a gateway drug to much harder drugs, and it should stay illegal forever to save our children” or “Marijuana is a medicine for so many different illnesses, and industrial hemp can be used for so many things such paper, building material, and much more. Why should it be illegal?” There are a lot of different factors that go into deciding whether something is beneficial or harmful. It is whether the pros really outweigh the cons that should help.

As the sun began to rise, on the morning of November 9, 2016, most Californians, awoke with a new profound sense of freedom to get high. For the simple reason that, the day before, most citizens throughout California voted yes on Proposition 64, which legalized recreational marijuana for adults over 21 years of age. However, I voted no to legalize recreational marijuana, this was due to my values and faith, but most importantly, for the simple reason that, it will negatively impact law enforcement agencies, as well as, communities. Secondly, studies have indicated that using marijuana on a regular basis can affect a person both mentally and physically. Nevertheless,

Over the past decade there has been a great deal of political unrest and discussion regarding the topic of medical marijuana. Many States have recently allowed its use in their respective states after the electorate agreed that it should be used as a medication. However, many medical providers are not educated in the possible positive and negative effects of medical marijuana. A recent study in Colorado found that 46% of 520 family physicians did not agree with recommending medical marijuana. Of the 520 physicians sampled, 27% felt that there could be a positive physical effect and 15% felt that there could be a positive mental effect. The most impressive indicator in this study is that 92% of the physicians surveyed agreed that continuing

However, studies have shown that this is not the case. A Rhode Island Hospital used self-reported data and “compared 20 years worth of data from states with and without medical marijuana laws, legalizing the drug did not lead to increased use among adolescents.” (Freidman, 2014,

When it comes to applying workplace regulation to medical marijuana, the issue is largely unfamiliar to most employers and their policies have not been altered to adjust to the legal implications of the drug usage for medicinal purposes or only address illicit use. In Michigan, business owners are under federal and state legal obligation to comply with drug laws. The question of companies breaking the law by allowing for employees to come to work under the influence is challenging in that the answer is yes, but the state laws enable users, but if caught at the federal level, a citizen could face jail time and legal consequences. The laws are still in place until reformed by Congress; time will tell if this change will occur and what that will mean for other drugs. So long as each state complies with their specific medical marijuana statutes and still enforces other illicit drug policies, the protections are in place.

Medical marijuana should be legal nation-wide; it has way too many benefits for it to not be used as natural cure, for a number of medical conditions. For thousands of years, marijuana has been used to treat a wide variety of conditions. Used medicinally vs. abused moronically is a huge issue in our country. Up until 1937, marijuana was legal in the United States for all uses recreational or medical. Medical marijuana is a safe and effective treatment for the symptoms of cancer, AIDS, glaucoma, and other conditions.

Economically speaking, marijuana legalization would make a significant impact resulting in the government saving and earning quite a bit of money. First of all, enforcement costs for cannabis charges would essentially be non-existent. Furthermore, the government could also tax the production and sale of marijuana. This would cause the government expenditure to decline and the tax revenue to rise. Jeffery Miron, a professor in the department of economics at Harvard University, conducted research in 2005 in which he gathered that legalization would reduce government expenditures by nearly $8 billion annually. About $5.5 billion would be from decreased expenditures locally and $2.5 billion would be saved on the federal level. These expenditures