Mark Andrejevic's Essay 'Visceral Literacy'

The evolution of television content is currently steadily moving towards reality television shows. The shift from interest in fiction drama series to reality shows has turned the regular television viewers into addicted voyeurs. There have been diverse views on the effect of reality television shows ranging from support to criticism. George Will, in his article “Reality television: oxymoron” believes that reality television is making ordinary people degenerate morally and act stupid in the effort to please a disinterested audience. Reality TV shows are relying heavily on building extraordinary characters or events out of the norm and attract the attention of the audience. Kellner argues that the audience is enticed by “media constructs

Freak shows ceased to exist because it came to be morally questionable, exploiting and dehumanizing to the performers. Attending freakshows became socially inadmissible. The twenty-first century, the “unusual” body as entertainment has gone from a spectacle to a private viewing. Media and entertainment are predominantly consumed through television and the internet, which can be enjoyed from the comfort of one’s own home. This brings the idea of “guilty pleasure,” allowing people to enjoy questionable content in private, free from humiliation or judgment. Reality television has gone beyond the extent American Horror Story has. Rather than reflecting on the history of the freak show, reality shows have brought the freak show back to life in

Audience: The target of this piece is mainly millennials and those interested in Reality TV, however this piece reaches a wide range of viewers from young to old because of the vast audience that reality TV encompasses. Some chapters would be very interesting to people who have experienced and viewed closely the several reality TV generations periods that Kavka outlines in her introduction. The author reaches many audiences through the analysis of reality TV over an extensive timeline. Her intended audience wants to analyze the true definition of reality TV and its many intricacies.

In Tania Modleski’s “The Search for Tomorrow in Today’s Soap Operas” she introduces that the rare appearance and function of soap opera in two ways. The first being the viewer’s ability to occupy the text’s recommendation of the viewers position of ‘the good mother’, and the second using the stereotype ‘villainess’ to displace one’s own bottled up anger and powerlessness. I will analyze these two functions by using Modleski’s perspectives on the positions of soap operas, how a new genre of reality television programs that are featured today function in a similar way.

Reality show characters are often shown in embarrassing situations and their personal matters are publicized to the world. The research found that frequent viewers of reality TV highly value revenge, competition, and achieving status and prestige (Mendible, 2004, p. 336). Mendible further discussed reality television’s strategic use of humiliation as a form of entertainment to draw in viewers (Mendible, 2004). With constant exposure to media images, audiences may be influenced by the television show’s values and subliminal messages. People use reality television as an informational tool to “people watch” and observe what is socially acceptable or not (Tyree, 2011, p. 397). The problem with using television to observe and decipher social norms with is that reality shows are not actually based on real events.

Noel Murray, a writer in TheWeek.com, published a nonfiction article on February 15, 2017 called, “TV’s Callous Neglect of Working - Class America”. Murray wrote this article to convey the fact that television series now don’t exemplify the realness of how most people live. To exhibit his views he uses a powerful structure, metaphors and oxymorons. Murray’s reveal that television does no unite us as one since the shows don’t even display the real daily life one may live. Murray establishes a informal tone for young adults watching television.

In the media, reality TV stars like Snooki and Kim Kardashian are on the rise. Most channels on television have at least one reality show, from following housewives to remodeling homes of real life families. However, there are some reality programs that display bad examples, especially for young audiences that are keeping up with each episode. On MTV people see girls being drunk in public, addicts doing drugs, and young girls raising babies at young ages; these are situations seen on reality TV shows. Jeremy W. Peters’ “When Reality TV Gets Too Real” and James Poniewozik’s “Why Reality TV is Good for us” inform readers about what the general public can view on television and how it affects the minds of children. Reality TV shows such as

Barbara Ehrenreich expresses her utter distaste for television in The Worst Years of Our Lives based in the 1980’s. Ehrenreich writes numerous assertions in regard to television’s unrealistic portrayal of every day life. She raises a valid argument when she points out that TV watchers will never see the commonplace facets of human life depicted on their TV screen. Instead, they watch shows filled with fake people, plastic smiles, ungenuine conversations, and unrealistic tasks all combined into a program that epitomizes the way in which we don’t live. Television distracts people from actually living their lives so instead they live vicariously through TV shows, wasting their lives away.

Do you know the guiltiest pleasure of the American public? Two simple words reveal all—reality TV. This new segment of the TV industry began with pioneering shows like MTV’s The Real World and CBS’s Survivor. Switch on primetime television nowadays, and you will become bombarded by and addicted to numerous shows all based on “real” life. There are the heartwarming tales of childbirth on TLC, melodramas of second-rate celebrities on Celebrity Mole, and a look into a completely dysfunctional family on The Osbornes. Yet, out of all these entertaining reality shows arises the newest low for popular culture, a program based on the idea of a rich man or woman in search of

In the essay, “Getting down to what is really real,” John Sullivan tells us about his thoughts on reality TV and explains why people are attracted to those shows. Some people might not like to admit they watch reality TV but it’s almost impossible to avoid hearing about it if you’re present on social media. We like watching it because it makes our lives look less stressful and drama is fun when you aren’t involved in it. It is easy to get attached to the characters and their unique personalities and most of all, people love the opportunity for easy fame.

This time around, it is middle America enjoying the circus on their wide-screen televisions in the privileged privacy of their dens and theater rooms. As the vast array of freaks in the popular media reveals, the circus, defined by Rosemary Thomson, in her book, Extraordinary Bodies, as a “cultural space of seemingly infinite license” (5), has us mesmerized: dwarfs, plastic surgery addicts, tattooed people, fatties and living skeletons, cross-dressers and child beauty contestants, to name a few. The world of so-called reality television, which appears to be a modern manifestation of the carnival

2004. Actuality TV: revamping TV culture, new York: New York School Press. [Google Scholar]. , 4–5). Similarly as a result, ‘reality TV’ defies easy meaning as an aftereffect from claiming this blurring the middle of secured standards for TV. However, this also prompts a perspective of distinction between the industry and its critics.

The author of this novel describes the people behind the broadcast valuing entertainment over the truth of the setting. But, the audience is proven to fail to keep that satisfaction long-lasting, highlighting how strenuous it is because of their seemingly artificial joy. Resultantly, readers can determine from how the citizens of the society react that they’re not in reality pleased since happiness is fabricated. It’s instead the rush of the moment that quickly disperses as soon as the “show” ends. In this way, the audience’s feelings consequently reveal that contentment stripped of optimism has no meaning.

Her viewpoint is insufficiently supported by solely recruiting a counterexample concerning the constraints of free speech regarding the student placements, without referring to the inadequacy of formal learning as the comparison, which somewhat undermines her authority that readers believe in. However, aiming to garner the approval from readers, Friedman constructs her points of view toward the magical critique of early reality TV from two progressive points: one is the specifical discussion of the reality TV in regard to emotions and stressors, which engages dash interrupting the sentence to create a striking contrast that emphasizes the freedom of discussion of reality TV over placements; the other argues the further individual critical analysis of reality TV that allows viewer to see dominant discourse and stereotypes. The repetition of "Thursday night" not only verifies her solid memory but also implies the delightful learning experience regarding watching reality TV. In sum, this section is intended to prove the superiority of learning via watching reality

For close to a decade, the ethics behind the existence of reality TV have been questioned. While there are ardent viewers of reality TV, researchers and other scholars disapprove them, and claim that the world would have been in a better place. Reality TV shows, especially in America, are extremely profitable to media owners, and this has increased their popularity in the recent years. The main target audience for these shows are teenagers and women, who spend a lot of time discussing about them, even hours after the shows. Most of the reality shows in America and other parts of the world have common ideas. The most fundamental aspect of most reality TV shows is that they display people who go through embarrassing, painful and humiliating ordeals. This is what the reality shows expect their audiences to be entertained, and presumably laugh at the situations the people go through. For this reason and many more, it has been found that they are more detrimental than entertaining to the society, and therefore, the world would be in a better place without them (Pozner 89-91).