Market Model Pattern of Change

Global competition in recent years has had a great effect on the American automotive industry. More efficient cars being developed overseas posed a threat to local companies’ market shares (Investopedia, 2015). Market shares of largely well-known companies such as General Motors, Ford, and Chrysler all suffered losing between three and ten percent of their previously held market shares between 2000-2014 to foreign competitors (Investopedia, 2015). For decades, the United States had the best technological advances in the industry and it was very difficult for competition to survive. In response to this, companies overseas invested significant amounts of money into researching new innovations and ways to produce better automobiles than the United States (Investopedia, 2015). Also, because of the difference between currency values, the cost of labor in other countries is lower than here. This allows foreign companies to be able to sell their products at lower costs and attract customers through undercutting their competitors’

Main protectionist policies include tariffs, quotas, embargos and voluntary export restraints, and Adam Smith’s idea of absolute advantage has been developed further to explain international trade. In recent years, protectionism has become closely related to globalization during which the influences of trades spread almost everywhere, so people insist upon the study of social deformities generated by improper policies on international trade and the task of pointing them out with a view to remedy. There are certainly both economic and political purposes of trade

This oligopoly produces homogenous products, in this case automobiles; which again, fits the profile. They do produce many types of automobiles, but the product is still homogenous in the aspect that it is only automobiles that these competing companies are producing. As in a typical oligopoly, even though it is a homogenous product, automobiles, they are producing, they still rely on heavy advertising to play up the non-price competition between each companies’ products in order to boost sales.

Protectionism by way of the price mechanisms such as tariffs, subsides, quotas, export licences and import duties (Rugman, 2009) are just some of the measures which can seriously impact on a foreign company. For example the American steel industry was afforded protection under the Bush administration when large tariffs were imposed on foreign steel imports in order to safeguard the jobs of the national steel workers (Mankiw and Taylor, 2008).

In assessing the market structure in which General Motors is operating in, I will outline the central assumptions and resulting implications of the oligopolistic market structure. I will study both the current competitive behavior of General Motors, as well as sales and cost statistics to determine whether they correspond to the characteristics of firms operating in an oligopoly. I will also examine the

An oligopoly is the system this country needs. Since there are only a select few companies manufacturing a good there still is room for lower prices. But also there is inspiration for innovation. These companies consider their competitor’s actions when prices change and are required to follow to keep their share of the market. Automobile manufacturers are perfect examples of an oligopoly. The price for manufacturing is high, yet there is a specific standard and desire to innovate and come up with the best product on the market.

The automotive industry designs, develops, manufactures, markets and sells motor vehicles, and is one of the world’s most important economic divisions by profits. This analysis focuses on the industry, specifically, manufacturers of automobiles. There are five competitors in the StratSim environment: Firm A, B, C, D, and E. Industry sales in the most recent year were 4.3 million units, with expected growth in the next year. Within this industry, there are seven-vehicle classes: Economy, Family, Luxury, Sports, Minivan, Truck, and Utility. There are two new classes with potential – if properly marketed.

Each car company that is around today is worth a fortune. We have not seen any new entrant enter the car industry in quite a long time because it takes a lot to come to the table and compete with these multi-billion-dollar car companies. The threat of substitutes is moderate because there are a certain amount of competitors, but each company has many different product lines for its consumers to choose from. The use of public transportation is growing and the same goes for the train for everyday commute. The bargaining power of buyers is minimal because of the close margins in the industry as a whole. Saturn is able to allow its customers no bargaining power with their pricing policy because they will not let consumers go below the actually cost of the car. Finally, the bargaining power of suppliers to an automobile manufacture like General Motors will not have a lot of power to negotiate because of the amount of orders that General Motors is places every day. An example of this is let’s say General Motors is talking with a speaker company for speakers in their cars, and General Motors is not happy with what that speaker company is doing, General Motors can simply go to another speaker

The Ford Motor Company and General Motors have greatly influenced and shaped the global automobiles industry over the 20th Century. While there are other big car-makers both in the United States and elsewhere in the globe, the two companies have been the commonest and significant players across the entire sector. This research focuses on an argument of how competition between both companies has benefited them.

The auto industry adopted new globalization trends that could steer the restructuring of global manufacturing in order to meet the challenges of global economies. There was the need to improve on efficiency and maintain a competitive level in the automobile industry. Automotive manufacturers from Asia, Europe, and the US adopted global trends such as integrating low- income countries into the global division of labor. The aim of the automobile industry in adopting globalization was to enable it shift from the economies of scale to the economies of scope. The industry started focusing more on manufacturing capabilities that could enable it meet the increasing marketing demands. The rapid changes in technology-forced automakers

Free trade has long be seen by economists as being essential in promoting effective use of natural resources, employment, reduction of poverty and diversity of products for consumers. But the concept of free trade has had many barriers to over come. Including government practices by developed countries, under public and corporate pressures, to protect domestic firms from cheap foreign products. But as history has shown us time and time again is that protectionist measures imposed by governments has almost always had negative effects on the local and world economies. These protectionist measures also hurt developing countries trying to inter into the international trade markets.

The United States Automotive industry has been dominated by five major auto manufacturers: GM, Toyota, Ford, Chrysler, and Honda. As globalization increases the domestic automotive market (GM, Ford, Chrysler) suffers from foreign competitors. Although with high entrance barriers the market suffers little to none from new entries. There are several reasons for this the largest being capital. It takes a lot of capital to obtain manufacturing plants, raw materials, as well as to hire and train employees. PASTEL Analysis

The main driving force behind the decision of BMW to turn to globalization was competition from global companies in Germany, the United States and Japan who are major competitors in the luxury segment. The automobile industry is highly globalised with many major manufactures operating all over the world. Automobiles built in one region are sold, with necessary changes, around the world. The main force for global convergence was the virtual disappearance of the national manufactures being squeezed out by the international giants and the standardization of markets across international boundaries. Forced by international regulatory bodies at regional level and fuelled by ever more intensive global communication.

Ever since the first involvement of government in international trade, many people have posed their opinion about what the role of government should be in it. Different factors are involved when it comes to deciding what this should be. It impacts a lot of people, so in order to do that, trade policy must be properly defined, identify what the roles of government currently are, and their involvement in it, and then analyse what should be their role. Trade policy is how a country carries out trade with other countries (Commercial Policy, n.d). Even though a lot of people support government intervention in international trade, countries would benefit a lot more if the government removes protectionism and promotes free trade instead.

A second point of consideration relating to the intensity of rivalry within the industry was the level of industry demand. “Demand declines when customers are leaving the marketplace or each customer is buying less” (Hill &Jones, 2012, p. 62). This was the case in 2009 in many developed nations due to the recession, which was marked by job loss, credit problems, and high gas prices that increased the demand for fuel-efficient vehicles or left consumers unable to purchase vehicles altogether. At the same time, growth was expanding in China and some other developing nations, which opened the doors for automobile companies in these countries to expand at home and