The Marginalization of Marriage in Middle America is an interesting article that explains a social phenomenon that is currently occurring within the United States. The problem is essentially the fact that that there is a wide range of forces that are driving the retreat from marriage in Middle America, more specifically with the moderately-educated Americans. Some of the driving forces include economic, cultural, religious, and legal factors. One of mentioned policies, with the intentions of resolving the problem, was the idea of “increasing the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) for childless workers and reduce the marriage penalty.” I agree to an extent with the fact that the policy will improve the current frequency of marital retreatment, …show more content…
There is most likely other economic sub-factors that contribute to the social phenomenon. The case could differ based on the person, and there is essentially “no single measure that can address all aspects of the problem.” A couple’s rationale for not marrying is not necessarily always based on the benefits they receive on tax credits, but the underlying problem could actually be based on the economic crisis that is experienced by the American middle-class as a whole—branching off into other sub-categorical reasons for why people are retreating from marriage. Additionally, as time has progressed, so have the structures and organizations of the society’s working-class. The jobs have become automated, or in other cases, have moved overseas, and it has become more difficult for “[educated] young men to find the kind of steady, well-paying industrial work that [will sustain] their families.” The manipulation of the EITC program may therefore not be enough to improve the current retreatment from marriage. The reason for the diminishing frequency of marriage lies on a variety of factors. It would be highly unlikely to solve it with such a specific implementation that may not appeal to all
Colonial American citizens faced several challenges through the time span of the 16th century to the 18th century. It was a time of great change and growth as well as being full of obstacles. The Revolutionary War, hostile Native American tribes, harsh living conditions, and disease all played factors in the struggle for survival in early America. However, there is a topic that is also significant but not discussed as often. Marriage was a confusing and exhausting situation for many individuals. One may wonder, ”What were the challenges of finding a spouse during the Colonial Era in American history?” It was difficult for young men and women to find a suitable marriage partner who would meet all their needs or standards and stay by their side till death do they part. Oftentimes, there was no choice in the matter. During this timeframe in American history, there were several barriers that affected whom one was allowed to marry. These obstacles included race, culture, social and economic status.
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the poverty rate for single parents in 2009 was 37.1%, while the rate for married couples with children was 6.8%. This means that being raised in a married family reduces a child’s probability of living in poverty by 82%. Policies that can be implemented to strengthen marriage would be ones that educate the public on the benefits of marriage to financial stability and child development. Returning to economic policies, the welfare system has penalties against marriage within it that create incentives to not get married. Since benefits are reduced as a family’s income rises, a single mother will receive more benefits than if she had an employed husband in the home. For low-income couples, this means that marriage would cause a decline in welfare benefits and an overall decline in the couple’s joint income. In order to remove these disincentives, the welfare system could be changed to increase the value of earned income tax credit for married couples with children. Work requirements can again be of assistance by making it so able-bodied parents are required to or look for work in order to receive aid. This will prevent the appeal of using welfare as an alternative to work or marriage. By implementing these ideas, marriage will increase and poverty and welfare dependence will
Marriage is the joining of two people as husband and wives according to laws and customs. In our society today, women get married of their own free will and gain respect from their spouse. "A dream of the 21st century" is a story written by " Winnifred Harper Cooly". It is about a young women's dream. She imagines that women in the 21st century will have a better place in the society. Ideal marriages in the 19th century were very hard to achieve and most of the time, they were without true love. This short story portrays that women of that time would marry someone to overcome financial difficulties. It also describes the lack of respect between the married couples.
In over half a century, marriage has transformed from being a social requirement to simply being an option in today’s society. What has caused this change? Many institutions in our society have changed drastically along with marriage. Although these institutions have not caused marriage to be optional, they do strongly correlate with the decreased value. The economy, education, religion, and government have all altered since the 1950s. When any institution encounters a change, all other institutions are affected. Family is a major institution in society, and I believe that marriage is an important aspect of this institution. Cohabitation, religion, women in the work world and divorce have all effected the way marriage is viewed today.
The first major social problem facing America today is the crisis of births to unmarried woman. In “Straight Line to Calamity” George Will writes, “rising illegitimacy is a self-reinforcing trend because of the many mechanisms of
The major movement regarding marriage in the eighteenth century was from church to state. Marital laws and customs, once administered and governed by the church, increasingly came to be controlled by legislators who passed many laws restricting the circumstances and legality of marriages. These restrictions tended to represent the interests of the wealthy and uphold patriarchal tradition. Backlash to these restrictions produced a number of undesirable practices, including promiscuity, wife-sale, and divorce.
Frank D. Bean & Charles H. Wood (1974) sought to determine if the relationships between levels of income and patterns of marital fertility varied within three major ethnic groups in the United States (p. 638). The article examined two major areas of sociological research, which included relationships between fertility, income, and minority group status. First, the researchers addressed research related to the impacts of income on fertility. Second, they explored the ways in which fertility could be influenced by minority group status. The overall purpose of their article was to demonstrate findings that would convey an improved, enhanced understanding of the effects that various income related factors have upon fertility patterns. Primarily, the authors wanted to further clarify the relations between minority group status and fertility patterns within ethnic groups in the United States.
“Just as today a woman’s wedding was one of the most important days of her life” (William Shakespeare info). During the Elizabethan Era, most marriages were arranged, and some couples would be introduced to each other on their wedding day itself! (William Shakespeare info) Many of times marriages were done so that both families could “benefit” in some way, such as status or wealth ( Linda Alchin). Even though there are some differences from then to now, weddings today have some of the same aspects as Elizabethan weddings did, because a wedding is still one of the biggest days of a person’s life. There were many customs, preparations, and important ceremonies done during these times, and some of them are
Many people believe that marriage is important in this day and age, but it holds little significance compared to the importance of marriage in the Victorian era. In the Victorian era women were to get married to a man of the same or a better social status, be good wives, and be a mother to her husband's children. Very few marriages started with love, but a woman's life is not complete without being married. Over time, the role of married women has evolved a great deal and they now have rights and privileges. John Stuart Mill was one of the great thinkers of the Victorian era, and his essay The Subjection of Women tells how few privileges women had and that they were slaves to their husbands. He also says that women are their own people and
The simplest and most basic foundation of a sociological civilization or group begins at the core center of sociology; which is marriage and the inner-fabric creation of a family. It is said that matches are made in heaven, however finding and defining your “soul mate” differs from one social group to the next. The social institution of marriage changes and adapts consistently through time, religious practice, and national beliefs. Many people believe they lead happy and satisfying lives without a marital partner, as others highly value and desire a life-long marital partner as the pinnacle achievement of their life.
One of George Eliot's challenges in Middlemarch is to depict a sexually desirous woman, Dorothea, within the confines of Victorian literary propriety. The critic, Abigail Rischin, identifies the moment that Dorothea's future husband, Ladislaw, and his painter-friend see her alongside an ancient, partially nude statue of the mythic heroine, Ariadne, in a museum in Rome as the key to Eliot's sexualization of this character. Ariadne is, in the sculpture, between her two lovers. Theseus, whom she helped to escape from her father's labyrinth in Crete has already left her, while the jubilant God, Bacchus, her next lover, has yet to arrive. "By invoking the silent visual rhetoric of ancient
At first, I was struck dumb that someone with a higher education could even give me this kind of advice then it just pissed me off, and thought 'I don't need a man or his damn papers.' Well, I didn't marry anyone, just choose a different path. To me, marriage is something that shouldn't be taken lightly, and I do believe in divorce, but I don't want to use someone for just papers or pay someone for them. I call Seaside my home because I lived here more than 20 years and Mexico is just a faint memory. Now once again my future is uncertain with the newly elected president. I will face those new struggles head on; if the door that I been using closes, well another door will open or even a window, if not I will fight until one opens up. I won't
In the Victorian era, marriage was not as romanticized or fairytale-like as depicted in many novels of the time. On the contrary, love actually played a very minor role in the majority of matrimonies that took place. An engagement was entered into as one would approach a business deal, and there were some generally accepted rules and guidelines to follow.
Also the areas of: marriage is declining. Individuals are opting for cohabiting rather than marriage. Economic disparity takes it toll on marriage. How macro level factors such as economy,