preview

Marriott Case Study

Good Essays

I. Problem

Dan Cohrs, the vice president of project finance at Marriott Corporation, is preparing his annual recommendations for the hurdle rates for each of Marriott’s three divisions: lodging, contract services, and restaurants. However, this is a complicated process because finding beta, cost of debt, and cost of equity in order to find weighted average cost of capital, or WACC, must be calculated using proxy firms and divisional data.

The firm’s use of WACC is directed towards analysis of the company’s future capital investments. Specifically, firms use it as a discount rate in determining a projects profitability versus the cost of taking it on. A firm-wide WACC is a beneficial tool for determining whether a …show more content…

This leads to an overall WACC of:

WACC = [.74 * .1005 * .66] + [.26 * .1704] = 9.34%

Marriott’s restaurant division has a very different target capital structure than the firm’s lodging division. Specifically, the restaurant division’s target capital structure is composed of 42% debt and 58% equity. The restaurants unlevered cost of equity is 14.96% and the levered cost of equity is 16.97% (See Exhibit 3 for calculations). The cost of debt is based on the 10-year treasury rate plus a risk premium of 1.80%, leading to an overall cost of debt of 10.52%. Therefore, the overall restaurant division WACC is:

WACC = [.42 * .1075 * .66] + [.58 * .1697] = 12.82%.

IV. Recommendation

Key points:
- Firm-wide WACC would result in a lower bottom line for Marriott - wrong benchmark leads to unnecessary errors in accept/reject decisions
- Conflicts with Marriott’s investment strategy to “invest in projects that increase shareholder value”. - single hurdle rate would decrease shareholder wealth
- Not a difficult decision when the potential for wealth destruction is considered.

Exhibit 1

Reu (Marriott) = [.1284 + (.6/.4)(1-.34)(.1025)]/[1 + (.6/.4)(.66)] = 11.55%
Rel (Marriott) = .1155 + (.6/.4)(1-.34)(.1155-.1025) = 12.84%

Exhibit 2

Reu (lodging) = [.1705 + (.74/.26)(1-.34)(.1005)] / [1+(.74/.26)(1-.34)] = 12.48%
Rel (lodging) = .1248 + (.74/.26)(1-.34)(.1248-.1005) = 17.04%

Exhibit 3

Reu (restaurant) = .[1697 +

Get Access