Martin Luther King And Nelson Mandela Comparison

Comparing Martin Luther King and Malcolm X Martin Luther King and Malcolm X are to diverse individuals with two opposite personalities but both successfully succeeded in achieving freedom and bringing equality to black Americans discriminated against for many years even after the abolishment of slavery. Martin Luther King was born in 1929, in Georgia, Atlanta. Unlike the other black people in the southern states he was different he grew up in well off family who was freely educated a key factor in his personal achievements. During his younger adult years just like his father who was a preacher King decided to work in the Christian church as a Baptist Minster. He idolised Mohandas Karamchand

“It’s not easy to be a hero. You do it because of what you believe, not because of what other people deserve.” Anyone can face a challenge or a hardship. But what makes a true hero is how the person takes on the challenge. Often, heroes show feats of ingenuity and acts of bravery. Two heroes that acted during the American Civil Rights Movement, were Martin Luther King Jr, and Rosa Parks. A hero is a person who has demonstrated behaviors to ethically receive our appreciation and respect. A hero is an ordinary person who finds the strength within themselves to persevere and undergo hardships and calamity.

Martin Luther King Jr and Malcolm X were very huge leading figures during the Civil Rights movement. Though they had many differences, they had some similarities. Both men’s fathers were preachers and both men were religious preachers themselves. Dr. King and Malcolm X were around the same age and they were both assassinated. Coincidentally, both men had the same number of children and eventually they had the same ideologies for the Civil Rights Movement. However, Dr. King and Malcolm X were different in ways such as Malcolm X wanted black supremacy and Dr. King wanted equality, Malcolm X saw violence as an option to achieve his goals if peace did not work and Dr. King believed in complete nonviolence, and Malcolm X

To be reliable means to be dependable. For a website to be reliable, it needs to present facts or issues in an unbiased manner; we need to be able to depend on the information found on the site. Some websites are better at that than others. Martin Luther King, Jr.: A True Historical Examination looks like a reliable resource for students researching Martin Luther King, Jr., but the site lacks the objectivity of a similar site, the Seattle Times’ website, Martin Luther King Jr. and the Civil Rights Movement, making it unreliable.

Another similarity between King and Mandela is that they had the same beliefs. King firmly supported his nonviolence protest movement for the equality of blacks in America. According to Peter Goodwin Heltzel, Assistant Professor of Theology, "King's strategy to dismantle these 'powers and principalities' was through building a large-scale,

Imagine yourself back in the 1960's as an African American fighting for your own right to be an average human being. It is already well known there were many heroic leaders for these people through their struggle. Two of these well known leaders were Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X. While these two people were both influential in the African American fight for equality, they each had their own way of representing their ideas. Dr. King was more of a pacifist in his fight for freedom, while Malcolm X was more aggresive with his strategy. While both men were highly effective in their fights, Martin had the stronger plan overall for several reasons. The first reason would be that peaceful protests will not get as many, if any, people harmed due to violence in the protests. It was also a stronger strategy as it was more convincing to people who were against their cause. Those who argue Malcolm X had the stronger strategy do not realize that to win with aggression, you must be able to fully defeat your opponent. For Malcolm's strategy to really work for him, he would have to have ran his opposition fully out of business, which would have been nearly impossible. Martin Luther King Jr. had the stronger strategy for equality because it would result in less harm, communicate the message more effectively, and, unlike Malcolm's plan, not require fully beating their opposition.

Martin Luther King and Malcolm X were two greatest leaders in the fighting of the Civil Rights Movement. Contrary to most American belief, King and Malcolm X were not perfect opposite to each other. However, they do have distinct method to achieve social and economic equality. Malcolm X and King were both civil rights leader during 60s. They had the same goal, which was to achieve social equality for African Americans and Black people. Malcolm X was born in a extremely poor family, which led Malcolm X end up in jail because he sold drug and armed robbed others. In the jail, Malcolm X encountered the teaching of Elijah Muhammad.From then on he was a changed man. Unfortunately, Malcolm was assassinated when he was thirty nine years old.

Two different men with similar intentions. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X were both activists who wanted to see the advancement of African American people. Both men are significant pieces of history when it comes to the civil rights movement. Their past actions have opened up many doors which are still happening today. Even though they are gone their legacies will always live on because they were the stepping stone for the current activists that we see today. Both Martin Luther King and Malcolm X were profoundly dedicated to the advancement and social equality for African Americans. However, they picked different paths to fulfill their objectives to enfranchise the African American race.

Are rights something you're born with or something you earn through hard work? In some cases it would be something you earn like African-Americans during the early to mid 20th century. The Civil Rights Movement was at work. During this time two leaders were introduced, Martin Luther King Jr and Malcolm X. Martin Luther King Jr was born into christianity and lived in a segregated neighborhood. Throughout his years he would learn of good morals and God. Malcolm X on the other hand went to prison for a 10 year sentence. In jail he learned about segregation from black muslims. This is where he earned his nickname “X” and learned of black heritage. Although both leaders seem very similar due to their want for change, they are very different.

Two men with one goal. Two powerful speeches that were similar yet very different. How were Martin Luther King's and Malcolm X's speeches similar and different? In the early 1960's, Malcolm X was a civil rights speaker, just like Martin Luther King.

Martin Luther King Jr. and President Barack Obama both have similar viewpoints on how to handle problems, but their positions in society make them think differently about when violence actually needed to obtain peace. King is a firm believer that nonviolence is the best way to obtain a goal and proves so when he says that nonviolence is the answer to the biggest political question of the time, and he is clearly stating that nonviolence is the answer to the big problem of that time period, which just happens to be the injustice of discrimination. Another example of King showing that he is a firm believer in nonviolence is when he says the method for solving any conflict must not include any form of aggression, revenge, or retaliation. Here King makes a clear statement that the key to solving any problem is not to use any form of violence. On the other hand, Obama makes it apparent that he believes that violence is necessary at a certain time to maintain peace and to keep the peace. So, when Obama says that nonviolence could not have stopped Hitler's armies, he gave a clear example of a time when nonviolence would not have worked. Hitler is one of the most infamous people in the history of the world and his rampage across the world could not have been stopped by sit-ins or a few nonviolent rallies; he had to be stopped with force, or he would have continued to murder more and more innocent people until he had no one else to murder. Another example of Obama’s viewpoint is when

Notably during the time of the 1960's there was many elements that came into play with our country, Disheveled we had to deal African americans, and the economic issues that were at hand. Martin Luther King Jr as well as Malcolm X, Played a huge part in how things were during that time period. Whether it be protest or not buying the products from stores to show that they will not stand for the cruelty that has happened. Both Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X Fought for equality and fought for a nation that was more civil and a better place to live for all people.

Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr. were both known as civil right leaders in the 1960’s. Both men had a different perspective on civil rights and how civil rights should be won. Both men also had strong beliefs on religious and followed on through that path in different ways. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X had several differences and several comparisons and had a big impact for the people of The United States.

Whether or not you agree with their views, both Friedrich Nietzsche and Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. were great, highly influential men. Their views, though radically different, impacted the world in the greatest of ways, altering history for many nations. While Nietzsche, a German philosopher from the 1800s, spoke from a materialistic point of view, believing that there is no god and that all that exists is matter, King, a civil rights activist of the 1900s, spoke from the belief in transcendence, that there is indeed a god, and that he exists in a divine realm outside of this universe. But not only do these men differ in their backgrounds and religious beliefs, they differ radically in how they believe society should function. In Nietzsche’s writings, he promoted a system that emphasizes will to power. He believed that an aristocracy was the basis for a great society. King, on the other hand, promoted a system of equality and justice. He thought all men were created equal, and that society should reflect that belief. The writings of these men have come to be studied by people everywhere. They are so influential, in fact, that one of them played an incredible role in getting our society to the point that it is today.

Nelson Mandela and Martin Luther King Jr are two historical figures that have been analyzed and researched countless times over the years. Through the work of Aaron Bady and Michael Dyson, Nelson Mandela’s and MLK’s romanticization of their remembrance undermines a certain importance left unseen. By viewing Mandela as the true man he was, a radical figure emerges from within that vowed for Palestine and many other radical groups. On the other hand, by viewing MLK as a legend and a myth, it undermines the efforts and ways still left to go for the black youth who need a role model. Although both Bady in "Robben Island" and Dyson in "Useful Hero" convey that the romanticization of Mandela and Martin Luther King Jr has lead to a misremembered past, they differ in the type of evidence used. By employing the use of contrasting evidence in Robben Island, it allows Bady to fluctuate his tone, while Dyson using his own singular personal evidence keeps the same tone throughout.