Martin Luther King Jr. and Susan B. Anthony’s Effects on The Brunswick Community

Dr. King’s actions display an example of a man putting social justice before his own life. Dwight D. Eisenhower is an example of an individual that truly has willpower. He led an army of nearly 160,000 Allied troops into Europe. If it wasn’t for Ike’s leadership, the troops would have never gotten to shore, and all of Europe, possibly the world, would have been lost to the Nazi’s. Not only did Ike create great military change, but he also created great inventive change. The idea of the interstate highway helped millions of people across the country. When they were finally built, people could easily ship goods and services. Both of these individuals displayed valuable acts of courage and conviction.

Behind every great man there is an even better story. George Washington Carver was born a slave around the start of the United States Civil War. Carver worked his way from his humble beginnings to becoming a world renounced scientist and inventor. Benjamin Franklin was born into a family of thirteen children in Boston, Massachusetts at the turn of the seventeenth century. Franklin rose from a lowly candle maker to a well-respected scientist and entrepreneur. Both contributed greatly to our understanding of the way the world works and how we can use it to our advantage. While both may be remembered for similar things, their lives were different every step of the way. Each Carver and Franklin had a different set of struggles to deal

Martin Luther King Jr and Rosa Parks are two examples of a historical heroes. According to Biography.com, “Through his activism and inspirational speeches he played a pivotal role in ending the legal segregation of African-American citizens in the United States, as well as the creation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965.” In other words, King did not sit all day and watch African-Americans get treated unequally, due to the color of their skin. He took action and stood up for what he believed in. This took a great deal of courage and determination because, people involved in these peaceful protests, suffered from violence and harassment. Additionally, Rosa Parks is a prime example of a hero who not once lacked

The names and faces of those considered pioneers in the fight for rights and freedom may not be instantly recognizable, but nevertheless, they are an important part to the history of the United States of America. Throughout the history of our country, there has not just been an injustice towards black slaves, but also towards women, with both being unfairly discriminated against. It was the work of many individuals who brought the unfamiliar taste for rights for all God’s creatures to the mouths of many people. The impact of such people, including Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Frederick Douglass, towards the demand for rights for women and slaves cannot be measured.

Gandhi, Chief Joseph, Susan B. Anthony, Malcolm X, and Martin Luther King Jr all made a change in history, which was making everyone equal no matter if people black, white, male, or female we are all equal inside. It is important for people to take a stand on issues of justice in society because you are changing something from unjust to just, stand up for people who cannot stand up for themselves, and to stand up for people so everyone can be equal. Changing something from unjust to just. During the time of Susan B. Anthony she said “we, the people not we the white male citizen; nor yet we, the male citizens, but we, the whole people, who formed the union.” She means she wants everyone to be equal.

Everyone faces challenges; however, not everyone faced the two pronged sword that the New Negro Women faced during the Harlem Renaissance. Not only did they have to find a way to define New Negro Woman to the New Negroes in the facially masculine Harlem Renaissance, but they also had to find a way to participate and connect with her new womanhood throughout discriminatory New Woman movement. Many New Negro women wanted to be able to have a private and public part of life - have a family and be able to work. However, they both had to face the trials of gender inequality and the tribulations of racial discrimination in the workplace. This question of “allegiance to race or gender” became a common theme in the works of the New Negro women.

Michael Jordan never gave up and to all his followers and other people he is a hero. He inspires others to persevere to follow their dreams and in the article Michael Jordan on Biography.com, it says “He led the Chicago Bulls to six National Basketball Association championships, and earned the NBA's Most Valuable Player Award five times.” Also, Martin Luther King Jr, a civil rights activist, is considered a hero to many people today. According to Biography.com, “through his activism, he played a pivotal role in ending the legal segregation of African-American citizens in the South and other areas of the nation, as well as the creation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965.” Martin Luther King Jr helped to abolish segregation and inspired others to protest against segregation so therefore he is known to many people as a hero.

Anthony may have done a lot for women in the 1800’s but how does she affect all people today? In the 1800’s as a women you were limited to about four jobs. A seamstress, a housewife, teacher, or nurse in the civil war. Today as a women you can be a business owner, Firefighter, Pilot, Astronaut, the jobs are limitless. She proved not just to women, but all people you can be more than just the status society gives you. Anthony also showed it does not take violence to share one’s feelings. “Anthony protested and gave speeches with no violence what so ever” [History.com]. This proves that if you have an opinion to share it does not take physical violence. Lastly, even though Anthony did not get to witness the first legal women's vote, she set women up for success. By founding the National Woman's Suffrage Association and writing books and giving speeches she had inspired all women in America. She gave women the confidence they

Malcolm X and Martin Luther King are both remembered as leaders who fought for a difference in

During the period Anthony attended to the Antislavery in Syracuse N.Y. Where she meet abolitionist activists like Amelia Bloomer and Elizabeth Cady Stanton. She became a lawyer of anti-slavery and driving campaigns. In others sates slavery coming strong where Anthony had to traveling to helping with activities and speeches. But is was not successful their campaign as they faced hostile battles where hanging and burned a figure about her with not reason. Her image was even dragged and the street. Sometimes the make funny were her events on public sees as unpleasant situations, even the media reported remarks femininity. At that time a single woman are seen as strange to some kind of defect. Customs are at the time was that the woman should be married and keep your home. You could not see a woman undergoing in politics or be an activist like Susan B. Anthony. This article how portray Susan B. Anthony in the Chicago Daily Tribune

Susan B. Anthony is an influential figure in American History for a multitude of reasons. Her primary contributions were made through her ability to voice her opinion over the unequal rights for women and blacks. The thing that makes Susan B. Anthony stand out the most is her power to get women the equal rights they deserve. Through the years of 1892—1900, she fought for the abolition of slavery and women’s rights. Her life spanned 86 years from birth on February 15, 1820 to death on March 13, 1906 caused by heart failure. Anthony’s contributions will be felt forever in American society because she gave women equal rights as men and assisted in the abolition of slavery.

Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr. were icons of the Civil Rights Movement and it still seen as that today. Though there were many others, these two are the most notable and are discussed frequently in our History classes. Their legacy is apparent because of desegregation. Many compare the two because they wanted they both wanted the same thing, but they had very different backgrounds, beliefs and methods of achieving what they wanted. The two men were profoundly dedicated to social justice, but they preferred dissimilar control techniques to achieve their ultimate goal of justice and liberation for African Americans.

When it comes to debate about the success of the Albany Movement, one major pattern emerges. Those whose allegiance belongs to Martin Luther King tend to characterize the movement as either a complete failure, or as valuable solely due to its role in providing a learning experience for the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) during its mission in Birmingham. Likewise, those that believe that the Albany Movement was a success in its own right do not maintain strong bonds with King, but instead value the grassroots elements of the effort. The reason for this pattern is due to King’s own interpretation of what victory entails. To King and his supporters, a successful mass action movement required not only the fulfillment of demands and nationwide headlines, but also federal intervention. In contrast, scholars and activists that are more aligned with the vision of community empowerment wager their opinion of success on the mobilization of the formerly quiescent black community. Furthermore, those that hold a King-centric point of view perceive the barriers the Albany Movement faced as signs of defeat, rather than indicators of persistence and organizational success like grassroots supporters. All in all, the defining factor that determines whether activists and historians consider the Albany Movement as a success or as a failure depends upon their view of Martin Luther King and grassroots organization.

Being intelligent and inspiring is one of King’s criteria for being a hero. For example, Martin Luther King and the leaders of the Alabama Christian Movement for human rights decided to postpone the program to a date where the most amount of people will be able to hear it. “We decided to schedule our direct-action program for the Easter season, realizing that except for christmas, this is the

Women started becoming more vocal as did African Americans. Women and blacks during this time were not simply separate classes, “they were castes who for centuries were formally segregated by separate systems of law” (697). Many critics who supported the movement for women and African Americans were often seen as radicals because caste was a system of control so that touching one aspect of the system would have a ripple effect throughout all the components of the system. The only way to deal with this issue was to for associationalism as Carnegie explained. It was difficult for both women and African Americans to establish their rights in the United States. Even though slavery had been abolished during this time, Jim Crow laws were in effect and limited the success of African Americans for many