Martin Luther King Nonviolent Resistance

Martin Luther King Jr. is the peaceful template that every protestor should follow. Dr. King has personally inspired me to stand up for my beliefs, no matter the threats or disadvantages. The picture that speaks to me is Dr. King photographed in prison after a peaceful protest. Seeing this civil rights hero in jail truly awakened me. The photo tells me that in order to enjoy the justified freedom, you must suffer the ramification first. Martin Luther King also encouraged people not to quit, even when all hope is lost. Instead, continue fighting with the power of knowledge and strength instead of ferocity. By obeying the law, Dr. King changed equality and the perception of the African American race forever. His protests were proof that you do not need violence and hate in order to have your voice listened

Peaceful resistance to laws positively impact a free society because it allows people to protest laws they find unjust without harming anyone in the process. Sometimes we have disagreements with our government and that doesn’t mean that we should start a revolution and over throw the government. With peaceful resistance to the law, there is more freedom and rights given to people.

Peaceful resistance to laws positively impact a free society, because all committed acts of civil disobedience, all but in very different cases. Have shown a positive impact amongst the people by proving to everyone and the government that every U.S citizen has the freedom to fight for their rights and freedom and not let anyone disrespect their human morals.

Peaceful resistents to laws either positively or negatively impacts a free society. I believe that peaceful resistant to laws does positively impact a free society just look at Rosa Parks, Thomas Jefferson and also Daniel Ellsberg they all helped in some type of way by using peaceful resistance to the laws. In some ways civil disobedience does help the government get better and also some says that it destroys the civil society. From the article ,"Is it right to break the law" by Charles Frankel it discuss is it ever right to break the law and in some situations it is but it also depends on how you handle the situation and what your motives are. It depends on if you are harmimg someone and if your taking a stand and wanting to change something for the better. I do not believe that is showing negatively on society

Some of Martin Luther King’s ways to end segregation were nonviolent and direct action. The way the people handled this was amazing but at the same time is was incredibly dangerous. The definition of nonviolent, direct action is using peaceful means rather than force, especially to bring about political or social change. Furthermore, examples of non-violent direct action (also known as nonviolent resistance or civil resistance) include sit-ins, strikes, workplace occupations, blockades, or activism, while violent direct action may include political violence, sabotage, property destruction, or assaults.

Growing up in an era of hatred and violence would be a major obstacle for some, yet this struggle became Martin Luther King Jr.’s greatest motivator in life. Martin Luther King Jr. devoted his life to speaking out against Jim Crow laws and segregation in the southern part of the United States. He utilized the principles of nonviolence by protesting peacefully through marches, speeches, sit-ins, and other acts of civil disobedience. Through his background, actions, and legacy, Martin Luther King Jr. has had a significant impact on the world.

In my opinion, peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society. The whole point of a "free society" is where the people have a say and are able to stand up for what they believe in. If a law seems unjust to them, they should have the right to protest it or disobey it, as long as it is done peacefully. Martin Luther King is one of the most influential leaders in history. Without his non-violent protests and civil disobedience, the unjust laws of segregation might still be in place. One of my favorite quotes from MLK's "Letter From Birmingham Jail" is when

Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society. Peaceful resistance to allowing voices to be heard. It also allows people to fight for the rights that they believe in. In some cases it is a fight for equality and in other cases liberty. These are just two of the reasons why people participate in peaceful resistance to laws.

After watching those two videos, I strongly believe in non-violence resistance. In order for a social movement to have a greater impact on society, it is better not to use violence. As the book says, if the cost of making some concessions are so threatening to elites, however, that they may decide to fight hard and even violently against a movement for years or even decades (Luders 2010). Relating to this quote, Martin Luther King said that even if black people use violence, they will end up losing the battle because either they will be arrested, or they will be killed. Just as Martin Luther King, I am a strong believer in non-violence resistance. I believe it will have a bigger impact and influence on the opponent. The use of violence hinders

Peaceful protesting is unfortunately a sometimes necessary action in order to create a dialogue and make negotiations with people who may be oppressing a certain group or community.

Does peaceful resistance to laws positively or negatively impact a free society? I think that peaceful resistance positively impacts a free society. Many people used civil disobedience to prove a point in a situation that they believe needs to be changed. There are people such as Henry Throeau, Gandhi, Martin Luther King and Rosa Parks. Many people say that Henry Thoreau is the backbone to civil disobedience. Thoreau was arrested in 1846 for refusing to pay six years of poll taxes in protest of slavery and the Mexican American War. Thoreau believed that individuals could be free only if their actions were true to their own beliefs, with or without the support or approval of the community. Thoreau inspired Gandhi first and then MLK to follow, but these two leaders are responding to more pressing circumstances and responding as members of subjugated classes of people sharply defined by the social markers of race and ethnicity. Another important person who used civil disobedience is the same person who said "You must be the change you wish to see in this world" -Mahatma Gandhi. Gandhi used nonviolent civil disobedience to protest racial pass laws in South Africa and in India's Independence struggle, including the famous Salt

After President Trump's inauguration, a chain of Women's Marches occurred nationally and internationally. The Women’s Marches that took place on January 21st , 2017 in cities across the country were a political gathering to promote women’s rights, civil rights, LGBTQ rights, immigrant rights, environmental justice, racial inequalities, workers’ rights, and disability rights. Though, many people see the march as an anti-Trump protest, I personally think it is much larger than that. These protest not only went against issues that occurred during the election campaign but these emphasized on issues that affect all Americans on the daily. This movement became historical unlike many other protest due to the fact that all voices were heard, not just individual voices from each rally, whether its for immigrant rights, civil rights, or environmental justice, and many others. For once, there was unity across many different groups with different goals.

Peaceful Resistance to laws has a positive impact on a free society, due to that fact that it unites people and lets the citizens have a voice. Everyone is human and with that birthright, comes rights given to them by the government. The government is suppose to be made up of representatives chosen by the people that they believe, best represents their interests. But, there will come a time when the government may end up hurting its citizens due to many motives. At that, it's up to those same citizens who put them there to make sure to fix the problem.

I would argue that peaceful resistance enhances our free society in a positive way. It does this by giving people access to voice their opinions in a mature and respectful way, which helps not only educate the public, but also shows the higher authorities policies people feel most passionately about. This has been exemplified throughout history numerous times with African American rights, women’s suffrage rights and more recently, immigration policies. Unfortunately, violent protests have overshadowed peaceful rallies in the media and therefore the public’s eyes as well. Due to the media's power to spread news vastly and quickly, often assemblies may be viewed as negative due to one or two isolated events, despite that the greater effect was unification.

Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society. Rather than having violent movements and harming citizens, it is better to peacefully resist. Once a violence is used, the resistance to the law becomes nulled. People tend to not follow a violence protester. Once a violent riot starts, chaos is everywhere. People forget what they are truly fighting for. They unconsciously run away with the fear of getting harmed and dare not to go back. A peaceful resistance on the other hand leads citizens to join and support. People are able to see what they are fighting for and their real intentions. They are able to stand and cause no problem to people passing by as they are showing their support through silent voices. Many famous activists and leaders are for nonviolence. Mahatma Gandhi, a primary leader of India’s independence