Martin Luther King Protest Analysis

823 Words4 Pages
On April 16, 1963, Martin Luther King Jr., a Christian Baptist minister and social activist, wrote an open letter to secure the strategy of nonviolent resistance to racism in the South. He wrote the letter to let the eight other clergymen in Birmingham. He was approached by others for guidance, support, care, and encouragement on how to deal with racial and social injustice in Birmingham, Alabama, and the South, and help with the establishment of civil rights. As he tries to convince the other clergymen that the protests are necessary and this time was the right time to act upon them. We now compare the methods of protesting in the 60’s and today, and the effects of what has and will happen.
When we look back at the civil rights movement ear, did the nonviolent acts work for the cause? Overall, the peaceful protest from the letter describes the mass majority, opening their eyes to understand what's really going on in the society. However, the violence prior to writing the letter continued (even later that month). As for Dr. King, did he persuade the clergymen that the nonviolent acts were a strong demonstration and was necessary and important for what it was intended? No, the letter manly opened the eyes of some and gained and united his supporters. The non-violent actions do not change society; however, the acts can lead into something bigger.
Martin Liter King had always wanted equal social rights. He wantedhis people to have the ability to go outside and not get harassed
Get Access