Masculin- Féminin is a 1966 French drama directed by Jean-Luc Godard. In this film, the main character, Paul, is searching for his life’s purpose when he comes across a job for a marketing firm. This job requires him to conduct interviews, during which time, he met an aspiring pop artist named Madeleine. Paul ends up moving in with Madeleine, which essentially sparks an affair. Godard, the director of this film, comes across as having misogynistic views, due to the way he portrays women in the film; however, his portrayal is merely to show the objectification of women during this time. Since the sexuality of women played such a huge role in society, Godard depicted women in this way intentionally in order to gain attention for the subject. …show more content…
These topics being: the Vietnam War/ communism, love, and birth control/ sex. Most of these women are hesitant to openly discuss their sex lives with a man; however, they do not hold back when questioned about their extramarital affairs. All of the women have their own opinions when it comes to the topic of birth control. For example, Miss 19, one of the women interviewed, was asked about birth control. She seemed initially embarrassed when forced to talk about the subject; however, she did have extensive knowledge about the pill and other forms of prevention. Another woman that was asked about the pill, Catherine-Isabelle, stated that Madeleine believed birth control was “shocking”, so she did not use it. She instead reveals that she uses an unnamed form of contraceptive (condom?) that she obtained from a friend that brought it from America. Later, Isabelle reveals that Madeleine does not use any form of protection and is afraid that she will become pregnant by Paul. Paul, being the stereotypical male figure during this time, replied “I’m old enough to know
Nonetheless, the disclosure that surrounds the rape of the woman does not break away from the customary views on violence especially towards women. In the entire movie, women are depicted and viewed as extremely traditional and passive. They are supposed to follow whatever is required from them. Gender through the movie exists in the similar way through which race exists. The society in the movie is largely patriarchy, and gender is unconsciously used for the purpose of justifying oppression and patriarchal
Women often appear with glamorous image on advertisements, movies. However, there are also a lot of pictures to make women soured and routine such as women in the party, velvet erotic games, etc. By taking advantage of beautiful pictures, sexy women in the media seems to make the value of women become simply. People have acknowledging that women typically only have to dep, sexy, attractive, and space for recreation. Indeed, they hardly enhance the value of women. I am really shocked to find that most of social media is making people less interested in the intelligence, curved bar, and a lot of good things that women had not simply outward beauty. The media just give people that the public wants to. The film really makes the viewer think about the true value of women in the media and society. In addition, the film effectively appeals to the audience’s emotions and empathy. Throughout the film, the writer mentions her unborn daughter and her fear of whether her daughter “could grow up to be emotionally healthy and fulfilled given our moder culture.” She mentions that becoming pregnant and discovering her child was a girl is the reason she started looking to make a change in the way society and media sees women. This is an appeal to anyone who has a daughter or wants to have a daughter. They hope that people will want to make changes, just like the narrator did, for the future of the
Gundersen organized the book in many different ways. The prominent topics throughout the book were relocation, education, marriage, pregnancy, and constant changing times. The three women she selected belong to different classes, and have come from separate parts of the world. This choice was not by mistake, she chose these three completely separate lifestyles to show that these problems were not only occurring inside of one area or class. She selected these women to represent a whole for all women of this era. All women had to deal with the same problems, maybe not in the same way, but in similar ways.
Mike Wallace states before the interview that this interview is unrehearsed, uncensored interview on the issue of Birth Control. Mr. Wallace describes Margaret Sanger as a women who violated conventions and changed powerful oppositions to lead the Birth Control Movement in the United States. Even though he states her accomplishments or contribution to society Wallace does not forget the mentions that she was thrown into jail not once but eight different time for this cause. Mr. Wallance explain that this interview it the hear Margaret’s answer for her views on if Birth Control is a sin and why she fought for this movement.
Several film theorists have used a variety of tactics and view points to analyze feature films since their inception. One of the most prominent theorists of those that analyze films from a feminist perspective is Laura Mulvey. Mulvey is famous for her essay “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema,” which presents an array of theories involving the treatment of women in films. Arguably the most notable idea presented in Mulvey’s work is the existence of the “male gaze” in films. This essay will examine Mulvey’s theory of the male gaze in relation to Alfred Hitchcock’s film, Vertigo. Vertigo does not fit the criteria of a film that
The second section of the book talks about reproductive privacy. This is different kind of women, rich and poor. Middle class women had a better chance of having their reproductive habits private while poor and working class women had no such luxury. Women that didn’t have a lot of money would give clinics fake information so that they were unable to be found after they got the medical help/advice that they were inquiring about. Many doctors if they were put on the stand would not give up the girl, they would try to protect their patient the best that they could. This section deals a lot about women speaking out about contraceptives, and other such items. They were finally
Today’s filmmakers have three areas to focus on: the event or theme of the film, the audience who will be watching the film, and lastly, the individual characters and the roles they play and how they are portrayed and interpreted. Many of these films bottom line objectives are to focus on the “erotic needs of the male ego.” The focus on fetishistic scopophilia tend to slant the view such that we see the world as being dominated by men and that woman are
By having portrayed the female charactes in a superficial way, with no access to their minds from the narrator, and the “distant” behaviour towards them from the male characters, Le Guin makes a clear allusion to the subordination of women in the society. According to O. Neira (1981. p.84) “La mayoría de los papeles asignados culturalmente a la mujer están concebidos de modo que contrasten con la superioridad del varón.” (1). Mrs. Ursula criticizes this male chauvinist society arrengement. Nonetheless, as with the previous point, Le Guin does not state her point directly, but, instead, she recreates in the text the characteristics in which women lived in 1960´s American
Simone De Beauvoir in The Second Sex suggests that to resolve the tension between bad faith and authenticity, people must regard women as subjects and not objects. They must also collectively fight against the idea of womanhood in order to remain authentic to themselves.
One of the most interesting aspects of the book is how the narrative itself is thought of as unsuitable for women. The narration takes place on a small sailing boat, waiting for the ebb of the Thames to bring it out to
The male gaze puts his fantasy onto the female figure, which is styled, in a unique sort of way. In this traditional exhibitionist, role women are continuously being looked at and their appearance is delivered to the male gaze in such a way as a strong visual and erotic impact and provides male desire. The presence of a woman in a normal narrative film is the key of the movie. However, the key of the narrative film works against the development of the story-line and stops the action due to the erotic gaze. Butt Boetticher said: “What counts is what the heroine provokes, or rather what she represents. She is the one, or rather the love or fear she inspires in the hero, or else the concern he feels for her, who makes him act the way he does. In herself the woman has not the slightest importance”.
They embodied what he called the elevation towards God and the steady descent toward Satan. Baudelaire connects women to nature as a result denying them a positive role in his imaginative vision, this is where adequate misogyny can be seen. The first section of the poem is dedicated solely to the ideal as
In this movie, there are some scenes which reflect the feminism theory. The first scene is when Warner told to Elle that he want break up with her. The reason why Warner want to break up is because he is a blue-blood family which never marry women blonde. It seems that Warner always see a blonde women has a lower position than his family. This scene is reflect Foucault theory about the body as a power. He argues that;
Since its humble beginnings in the later years of the nineteenth century, film has undergone many changes. One thing that has never changed is the filmmaker’s interest in representing society in the present day. For better or worse, film has a habit of showing the world just what it values the most. In recent years, scholars have begun to pay attention to what kinds of ideas films are portraying (Stern, Steven E. and Handel, 284). Alarmingly, viewers, especially young women, are increasingly influenced by the lifestyle choices and attitudes that they learn from watching these films (Steele, 331). An example of this can be seen in a popular trope of the “romantic comedy” genre in this day and age: the powerful man doing something to help, or “save” the less powerful woman, representing a troubling “sexual double standard” (Smith, Stacy L, Pieper, Granados, Choueiti, 783).