Massive Vehicles

In the article, “Will Self-Driving Cars be Good for America” (March 10, 2016), Robert Peterson argues that America is ready for self-driving cars to take over the streets. The author first reports the statistics of car related accidents in America, and how much the damages have cost in all; he then presents all the benefits of autnomous cars by discussing how it will benefit people of all ages by limiting expenses, and being able to reach a destination without the need for a license; and to conclude, he then finishes his article by alerting the audience that they need to get ready for what’s about to happen to the automotive industry in America. His purpose is to inform the reader in order to convince them that autonomous cars are the only

As technology in automobiles continues to improve, the debate over driverless cars has become more frequent. A self-driving car is able to move and navigate on its own using sensors and programming technology without human control. Many people believe the development of driverless cars would be beneficial because they could reduce the risk of hitting another car. The sensors and navigation would be able to avoid accidents, while drivers usually get distracted and would be able to use their time leisurely in the car. A self-driving car may allow people to drive when unable to in the past, such as children and disabled persons, and can be more cost-effective due to cheaper insurance. However, self-driving cars could be extremely expensive and can easily malfunction and therefore not always reliable, while also decreasing the safety of pedestrians and children who may attempt to use the car without permission. With new technology and distractions, driver’s minds can easily wander and become preoccupied. Technology can easily malfunction, and something as small as my phone or a light bulb will glitch frequently. I often see cars stranded on the side of the road because the engine went out or broke down; imagine how catastrophic an accident could be if a sensor in the car went out. Driverless cars are not beneficial to society because while there are favorable aspects of a self-driving car, one can malfunction and add new risks to the road, as well as potentially hurting the

Researchers estimate that driverless cars could, by midcentury, reduce traffic fatalities by up to 90 percent. (McKinsey Report) Which means that, using the number of fatalities in 2013 as a baseline, self-driving cars could save 29,447 lives a year. (Atlantic, 30000)

First driverless cars are much less likely to crash. In fact “The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration estimates that between 93 percent and 95 percent of car accidents are caused by human error” (par. 5, Tribune). This study displays

Similarly, the article “The Moral Challenges of Driverless Cars” explains how driverless cars will be a safer alternative. It explains how humans are more prone to cause an accident than the driverless cars. The article describes the processing behind the vehicles and some problems they face while making them along with how this will delay their production. It also clarifies how the cars will be able to make the decisions that will keep people safe instead of putting them in harm’s way. Finally, the article describes the ethical issues and automation in cars today. According to Kirkpatrick, the cars are equipped with software that determine what reaction to make in different situations that would take a human more time to make, therefore, avoiding an accident. As stated in this article, there is still much work to be done before the cars are actually ready to sell to the public.

One of the biggest challenges facing autonomous cars is legal issues. As of right now computer technology and artificial intelligence face numerous legal battles. Most people have heard of the technology that Google is creating in an attempt to make a “driver-less” car. As the technology gets more attention in the news Google’s driverless car has become a very opinionated and sensitive topic. People often ask questions like “What if Google’s car hit someone? Who would be at fault for the accident Google or the owner of the car?” These questions are currently being debated at the state and federal levels.

Since the beginning of self-driving cars which first began in 1925 with the creation of the Houdina Radio Control; a car operated by two cars, a transmitter, and an antenna, to now - the futuristic dream of these autonomous cars have transformed into the reality of cars we see now. These cars are nothing short of the new technology advances that have occurred over the past decade. However, with these advances many question whether or not these cars are ready to be sold, due to the fatal accident that occurred May 2016 involving the autonomous Tesla and a white truck. Due to the Tesla not being able to detect the white tractor because of technological issues, the tesla failed to stop, and since the driver was not prepared to steer, it lead to the fatal collision eventually leading to the death of the tesla owner. With the increase of these cars on the road, from companies like BMW, Daimler, Ford, Apple, Uber, and Google, this poses a serious threat to not only the people operating this autonomous vehicle but also to the surrounding drivers. I believe that autonomous cars should not be put on the road, and that these cars are not beneficial to the population.

The purpose of this paper is to look at where the moral responsibilities would lie should a collision happen with an autonomous vehicle. Julian Nida-Rumelin, PhD and President of the interdisciplinary Munich Center for Ethics at the University of Munich, along with his graduate student Alexander Hevelke try to determine philosophically where responsibility should be placed both criminally and financially in the event of a car crash.

In the recent years, the United States government has been enforcing stricter mandates on auto manufacturers to create safer vehicles, and on construction companies to create safer roadways. Matthew Jensen wrote a dissertation for the Graduate School of Clemson University titled, A Methodology for the Analysis of In-vehicle Operating Data and Design of Intelligent Vehicle Systems for Improved Automotive Safety. In his abstract, Jensen evaluated the future of vehicle manufacturing and traffic-related incidents. Of course, every year more vehicles are manufactured, which in theory means the number of miles driven in vehicles increases. He points out how the World Health Organization (WHO) found that automobile crashes was the ninth

This essay is a persuasive essay. The author is trying to persuade the audience that driverless cars are not in our near future. We, as humans are not ready for it. The technology might be there but it’s not refined enough to handle everyday traffic situations like a human would. There is also the question of liability. If an autonomous car got into an accident, who would be at fault? The carmaker or the driver/operator?

Recently, a major technology shift in auto industry had changed the market. Google formed a group of engineer experts and invented self-driving car. The introduction of the concept had shocked the world and thus brought in a new threat to traditional automakers. The leading auto seller, Toyota, invested billions of dollar in researching automated driving technology after that. It is good to have such improvements to the society. But, one question has come to mind: How does automated driving affect auto insurance?

The article is about the driverless cars that may change the way people drive. The cars use technology that has lots of benefit and safety such as GPS, cameras and sensors. However, the accident can occur anytime maybe from drivers or car’s computers making mistakes. And consumers will response their

The primary concern with transportation, however, is safety. Safety is especially crucial for self-driving cars because one of the main purposes of these vehicles is to be safer than humans; in particular, they will make the roads safer for drivers. In other words, the vast majority of car accidents are caused by human error. In fact, roughly 1.20 million people worldwide die every year from traffic accidents and over 90% of those accidents account for the mistakes humans make on the road. Because humans are largely at fault for causing collisions when driving, self-driving cars are predicted to dramatically reduce traffic accidents and fatalities by removing human error from the driving equation. In essence, self-driving cars could potentially change the situations where drivers are at risk. Certain scenarios that typically lead to car accidents and endanger others lives include driving under the influence, texting, or driving while fatigued. Fatalities that result from these critical mistakes could be greatly reduced by up to 90 percent. Accordingly, self-driving cars could save as many as 29,447 lives a year in the country. (Lafrance, 2015) For this reason, self-driving cars can make a significant and positive difference in the way that society functions by ensuring safety to drivers and reducing the number of car accidents on a large

One of the major incentives for developing autonomous vehicles is the potential impact on vehicle safety. In 2009, there were 10.8 million motor vehicle accidents in the US, resulting in 35,900 deaths (Census 2012). It’s estimated that over 90% of all accidents are due to

Google’s autonomous car had clocked up 1 million miles on public roads, and the researcher planned to do more road test in the future in order to expedite launch the Google’s car. (Protalinski, 2015) The technology of autonomous car is mature enough to use. In addition, the law for autonomous car has been already passed in serval states including Florida, Nevada, and Michigan. (Boeglin, 2015) It seems to be obviously that autonomous are coming into and bringing profound effect in our daily life. However, before greeting this revolutionary vehicle, there are several problems that need to be solved, such as ethical dilemma, liability and privacy problems. In this essay, which decision is moral in emergency, who will be responsible for an accident made by an autonomous car, and how much intimate information of owner can an autonomous car use will be discussed.