Maunica Assisted Suicide Case Study

Since diamond is such a durable material, it can only be cut by another diamond.

- Confirmed with 3rd party what needs to be included in the email and foreshadowed when they will receive it.

Terrence Jr., Londyn, and Kennedy's father (Terrence's) smoke marijuana in the home. Terrence's girlfriend (Jasmine) smokes marijuana in the home as well. Jasmine has two children (Dallas and Salyha) in the home as well. Both adults sell and manufactured the marijuana in the home. The children have access to the marijuana. Terrence Sr. and Jasmine has unlocked guns in the home. The guns are out in plain view. Terrence sleeps with a gun underneath his pillow. Terrence’s has a gun in his truck. Jasmine’s has a gun in her truck.

Advances in medical treatments have raised the average life expectancy of people in Canada. However, it fails to guarantee a perfectly healthy life for people who experience incurable diseases. The rising interest in Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide in Canada, is an outcome of the desire of people to have a greater control over their lives in terms of their capacity to determine death when the patients are terminally ill.

The thing that kept Steven going was the thought that Jeffrey having cancer was going to be a mistake. During Jeffrey’s stay at the Philadelphia Children's hospital Steven was kept unnotified of how Jeffrey was doing. Apart of that he was getting no attention whatsoever from either of his parents. Steven felt forgotten and this brought anger. Through journals from Miss Palma’s class he wrote about how nobody had thought about how he was feeling about this situation. However when Jeffrey and his mother returned from Philadelphia Steven learned that the thoughts he had was wrong.

In 1981, in San Francisco, Chris Gardner (Will Smith) invests the family savings in medical scanners, which eventually financially breaks the family financially, bringing troubles to his relationship with his wife Linda (Thandie Newton). Their son Christopher (Jaden Smith) stays with Chris because he and his wife both know that he will be able to take better care of him. The misspelling of the word ‘happiness’ is obviously intentional. The mural outside of Christopher’s day care spelled it wrong everyday. Gardner pitched a fit about how he wanted it changed because it was just teaching the kids the wrong way of spelling it. The owner of the day care told him that it is not important to the kids how it is spelled. It is only important that

Brendaly engaged well with this therapist. Brendaly talked about the different barriers which prevented her from missing two scheduled appointments without contact. She stated moving to Lincoln Park and transferring Julian to a new school was the two major factors that prevented her from making scheduled appointments. Brendaly stated she will make contact with supporting staff if she is unable to make a schedule appointment. She stated the level of change she would identify herself is "Action in which she believes is taking steps to no longer engage in a specific

After asking about any nausea, vomiting, constipation, diarrhea L.J.H stated, “At this moment I do not have any problems with nausea, vomiting, constipation and diarrhea, but when I first arrived at the hospital I did feel sick which lead to me vomiting. I think it was because of my abdominal pain.” When asked what L.G.H’s typical diet would be she stated, “In the morning I will usually have eggs, toast and milk with some hot water. For lunch I usually eat leftovers from the night before or just make myself and sandwich. I don’t really each a lot of snacks. For dinner I usually have something with protein or starch with a side of veggies. I am usually good at eating what is okay for me. I have a lot of allergies so I don’t like to change up what I eat a lot.” After asking about alcohol or caffeine use L.J.H stated, “I never drank alcohol and I avoid caffeine.” When asked about the use of stool softeners at home L.J.H stated, “No I do not use stool softeners.”

This case study discusses the moral problems associated with physician-assisted suicide. The Catholic Church is apposed to such euthanasia because it transgresses God's commandment not to kill innocent life, it usurps God's sovereignty over human lives, and it violates obligations to serve others and the common good (Pg. 318). I can understand why the Catholic Church would be apposed to physician-assissted suicide, however I do not take this position. I support Oregon's Death with Dignity Act. Statistics show only a very small percent of patients, 0.132 percent, chose to end their life with euthanasia under this law between 1998 and 2010. Although Christians view such a suicide equally as wrong as murder, these beliefs are not shared by all

People who reach the requirements of the death with dignity laws, should have the right to end their own life quickly. Right now, only six states have legalized PAS (Physician-Assisted Suicide). The other 44 states are holding back the right for people with terminal illness, or people suffering from pain to die peacefully. Not giving a legal pathway for people to die, can lead to patients into committing suicide which is a more stressful way for their family. People should have the right to end their lives if they are in pain.

Jessica is a 30 year-old single female. She has a very low stress job and lives at home with her mother. Jessica has always been a mediocre achiever. She has not graduated college, which has been on and off in attendance for six years. She has very high standards for herself and can be very self-critical. Lately, she has struggled with significant feelings of worthlessness and shame due to her inability to perform as well as her younger brother.

Physician-Assisted Suicide is legalized in the following states: Oregon,California, Montana, Washington, Colorado, and Washington D.C. Oregon was the first state who legalized Physician-Assisted Suicide. “The very first annual report on the usage of the new Oregon Death with Dignity Act showed that 14 physicians prescribed medications under the law to 24 patients received prescriptions under the new law, of which 16 chose to take the medications. The patients’ median age of the patients was 69.”, (“MenuSite Navigation  Death with Dignity Act Annual Reports.” Oregon Health Authority : Death with Dignity Act Annual Reports : Death with Dignity Act : State of Oregon, www.oregon.gov/oha/PH/ProviderPartnerResources/EvaluationResearch/DeathwithDignityAct/Pages/ar-index.aspx.).

I will be discussing the criteria needed to legalize physician-assisted suicide by applying different moral theories. My main argument is supported by care ethics, but I will also be using Utilitarian, Kantian and Disability ethics to support legalization. Provided that the patients are competent and fully informed, physician-assisted suicide should be legalized in strict circumstances where life-ending treatments are the only or best way to care for a person.

The advance directive also allows individuals to designate an agent to make health related decisions. The decisions might include “Resuscitation, Mechanical ventilation, Tube feeding, Dialysis, Antibiotics or antiviral medications, Comfort care (palliative care), Organ and tissue donations, and body donation for a scientific study.” (Mayo Clinic Consumer Health, 2015). Thus, an advance directive plays an important legal role in the end of life issues.

Physician assisted suicide (PAS) is a situation in which a physician gives a patient medications that the patient can then self-administer in order to bring about death. The patient is a competent adult in these situations and has requested this service of the physician. The doctor does not cause the death of the patient; he/she only supplies the means. (American Nurses Association [ANA], 2013; Pasterfield, Lewis, Carter, Hodgson & Wilkinson, 2013). Nurses are not allowed to participate in PAS according to the position statement released by the American Nurses Association (ANA, 2013). This is the case even though studies, such as the one carried out by Smith, Goy, Harvath, and Ganzini (2011), show that the quality of death for patients receiving PAS are no worse than those who do not participate in PAS and family members actually rate the physician assisted deaths as better. According to Walker (2011), six ethical principles guide health care. Two of these principles, autonomy and beneficence, are particularly interesting when discussing PAS.