Apparently, Maxwell Technologies, needed to appropriately account for their sales revenue, which was the main factor for the restatement of earnings. March 7th, 2013 Maxwell Technologies, announced problems with revenue timing. The terms for sales of certain transactions were not being communicated with the Finance and Accounting department; therefore, the revenue was not being accounted for within the financial statements as discovered during the investigation. Anytime the financial statement is affected by errors a restatement is in order whether the errors were caused by human error, a change in services, sales, inventory, etc. (Mohr, 2016).
The Sr. Vice President of Sales and Marketing resigned and other employees were terminated for
…show more content…
The orange bars and dark blue line represent what the Accounts Receivable (AR) and revenue looked like prior to the restatement, the red lines represent the adjusted AR and light blue line show what the restatement would have looked like provided everything had been reported accurately. The brown bars and green line show AR and revenue reported August 2013 (Konrad, 2013).
In the case of Maxwell Technologies, stocks were not affected in a negative way, due to the restatement. Luckily for them the earnings were not affected because a portion of the revenue was to replace the general and administrative expense. Although, errors were made in this instance the revenue was increasing and did not increase earnings. The restatement was due to negligence and lack of communication at Maxwell Technologies. It is believed the VP of Sales and Marketing gave the terminated employees the incentive to fiddle with the books, which led to the problems of revenue timing. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act, states companies should have Codes of conduct for all accounting and financial employees and documentation procedures for retention of document. Maxwell Technologies employees may have knowingly violated; however, it has not been proven if they willingly participated based on the direction of the VP. The violation of the VP appeared to be both knowingly and willingly (Prentice & Bredeson,
• Bottom of screen are two lines = projected revenues, net earnings, earnings per share, return on equity investment, credit rating, image rating and change in cash position from the prior year.
* On Income Statement for December 31, 2011, the number of Revenues, Cost of Goods Sold, Expenses and Net Income will go
Any computer program revision must be approved by user departments after testing the entire program with test data.
Several high-profile cases of corporate financial fraud primarily the scandals involving Enron and Worldcom lead to the creation of The Sarbanes-Oxley legislation. SOX requires that companies maintain an archive of all business records for not less than five years. If found in violation of these requirements, consequences could involve potentially accruing fines or jail time.
The 1920 presidential election proved to be memorable as well as historically significant for a number of reasons. This time period is surrounded by important events in American history. It falls directly after World War I, starts the roaring twenties, and leads the United States into the Great Depression. Warren G. Harding was elected president over all other candidates, with promises of life going back to normal conditions. At this point in time, American citizens were desperate for one thing: their old “normal” life. The election of 1920 was important because our nation had just gotten out of World War I, the vote ended in a landslide, and Harding changed the United States for the worse.
In July 2002, a corporate reform bill was passed into United States Federal law by the U.S. Senate and the U.S. House of Representatives. This legislation introduced new and amended ethical standards regarding financial practice and corporate governance for all publicly traded U.S. companies, as well as for management and accounting organizations. U.S. Senator Paul Sarbanes and U.S. Representative Michael G. Oxley spearheaded the Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Act (Pub. L. 107-204) (Sarbanes & Oxley, 2002). This was originally known as “Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor
The act identifies and assigns accountability to those who knowingly falsify documents and it clearly states the consequences for acting outside the defined standard, relating to corporate governance. Using case studies we will review how the passing of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act is helping to standardized a code of conduct and how it has increased the awareness of corporate responsibility. First, we will review the definitions of corporate governance, business ethics and corporate responsibility. Next, we will examine the effectiveness of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, through a case study and identify possible challenges the Sarbanes-Oxley Act may face, as public demand for social responsibility increases. Finally, we will review proactive recommendations for provisions to key titles of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. These provisions will accommodate the growing public demand for ethical and social responsibility.
When analysts question a firm’s earnings quality, it raises concerns regarding under or over aggressive accounting practices that may be allowing the firm to manipulate the earnings. Earnings quality is defined as the strength of the current earnings in being used to predict future earnings and cash flows. Since earning quality is indicative of future performance, analysts are more likely to address issues that have substantial impact on the earnings quality. An issue arises when the nature of the earnings is questioned. While permanent earnings are part of normal operations, any irregular, one time earnings can skew the earnings, making the firm look more profitable than it is. This is due to the inability to recreate similar one-time transactions that will give rise to such numbers. Investors prefer predictable
In today’s world, the role of IT has turned accounting estimated critical in financial reporting and disclosure. Houghton and Fogarty have said that non-accurate or incorrect estimates have often caused to misstatements in audit report (Gray & Manson, 2007).
The Sarbanes Oxley Act came to existence after numerous scandals on financial misappropriation and inaccurate accounting records. The nature of scandals made it clear there are possible measure that could be used to prevent future occurrence of financial scandals. And the existence and effectiveness of Sarbanes Oxley has caused
The financial statements are showing that the firm is fiscally sound. This helps executives to capitalize on new opportunities in order to increase the company's earnings. For example, three important areas which are showing how the firm is enhancing their profits margins are in the sales, net earnings and dividends per common shareholder from 2010 to 2012. ("Built to Deliver," 2012)
As stated in Exhibit 3, Earnings management is the managerial use of discretion to influence reported earnings. Within the accrual accounting system, managers have significant discretion with their firms’ accounting choices. Management has the ability to make choices that can opportunistically lead to higher or lower reported earnings. Richard 's and Ira Zar’s (CFO) actions would not change if these results were the result of GAAP flexibility because he violated the rules of accounting, the conceptual framework principle of neutrality in numerous ways to report the financial results that CA did under false pretenses. It would be one thing if CA garnered these results through legitimate business decisions versus using accounting tactics like changes in accounting estimates or outright fraud as in the use of the 35 day Month. The purpose of which was solely to allow CA to meet or exceed analysts’ estimates.
When an error of overstatement like this one happens, the financial statements have to be restated in order(ed) to bring net income to the correct amount. The Cost of goods sold should’ve been increased by $8 million and the same
Simply put, the horizontal analysis compares specific line items on a financial statement to a base year and computes a percentage change for the year in question. Our horizontal analysis here uses 2013 as the base year and looks at subsequent change relative to that. On the income statement, we should be cheered Amazon’s strong 43.72% growth in net sales between 2013 and 2015, which
First, sales stay positive and is relatively stable as evidenced in Exhibit 1. Consolidated Income Statement and in Exhibit 2. Horizontal Analysis - Trend Percentages of the Income Statement.