Mayor Sadiq Khan's Diplomatic Summary

Banned assault weapon is not the way to slow the crime rate down, What it going to do is keep the gun in the hand of people that are going to harm someone and keep them out of the hand of people that are going to use them for hunting purposes. I say this because bad people will alway be able to get there hands on them.

In a recent interview with the Fife Star, King Malcolm stated that he would “restrict our citizens access to daggers.” Now the left always blames inanimate objects and law abiding sword and dagger owners in the wake of mass killings; of course he will fail in his attempts, to spew his redirect and pass legislation (proven to not work, Pg. 17)

The author states why it is a good idea to carry a knife, we would have to be physically fit with good aim or skills if we were to carry a knife, But fighting against someone with a gun while the person has a knife the gun wins so it wouldn’t be able to protect the person. We would

This act grants the local authorities (police) more responsibilities in reducing crime in their areas.

By concealing the weapon, citizens can go about their day normally without being distracted by a handgun on someone’s person. Many Americans are beginning to grasp the concept that gun control laws are rapidly becoming useless. John C. Moorhouse and Brent Wanner, authors of “Gun Control Law Do Not Reduce Violent Crimes” State that the reason gun control is ineffective, is because it does next to nothing to stop criminals from getting their hands on firearms (Gun Control Laws Do Not Reduce). To reduce gun crime, more needs to be done to stop criminals, instead of focusing efforts on law abiding citizens, they are not the ones to worry about.

To conservatives, it would mean that the government would allow free use of weapons in order for the individual to protect him/herself. To liberals, it would mean that the government is there to protect the citizens, to provide protection for the individuals. Conservatives don’t trust the police, as the police force is a part of the government. Similar to how liberals don’t trust anyone with a weapon, seeing many homicide stories have made the headlines. As a moderate, I’ve done researches on how other countries control their government and I found one weapon control from Japan to be very suitable for our own use in the United States.

In the past six months, there have been a total of 19,635 gun incidents. Out of those 19,635 incidents, 107 were mass shootings, 829 were home invasions, and 604 were for defensive use, according to Gunviolencearchive.org. It is unbelievable to see the number of gun related incidents that have happened in just the past six months. What is even more unbelievable to imagine is that so many of those incidents could have been avoided if people were allowed to carry concealed guns in certain places. Concealed carry, or concealed weapons, is the practice of carrying weapons, such as a handgun, in public in a concealed manner. All fifty states in the United States allow concealed carry in public places to some degree. But, some places, for example, schools, restaurants, and stores, prohibit concealed weapons. The controversy about whether concealed weapons should be prohibited in certain locations has been debated for years, and more often in the past decade. On one side of the debate, supporters of the “gun-free zones” claim that prohibiting concealed weapons in certain locations will reduce crime and ensure that the location is free of gun violence, allowing concealed weapons can result to more guns landing in the hands of criminals, and some even insist that public safety should be left to professional, qualified police officers, not ignorant citizens with little to no expert training. However, it is absolutely necessary to know that prohibiting weapons in certain locations

Goals of this policy is to make sure that the general people can have enough safety and know the rules of keeping the guns and other firearms at their place for their own self-protection. (Shennasa E, et. al, 2014)

"Laws that forbid the carrying of arms disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes. Such laws make

James Q. Wilson a former teacher at Harvard University understands that taking guns away from the common people will only reduce the chance of surviving a possible attack of any sort of intruder.”Those that they cannot buy,

individuals with firearms as weapons. A line has been drawn in the sands of society, but clearly

keep weapons out of the hands of criminals because a criminal is going to do what a criminal does best,

Police are here to protect us from crimes, but what if they can’t reach us in time? Many people want guns to be taken away because they don’t know the proper handling, and one of the few things they know for certain is that guns hurt people. It is understandable that they should fear the danger of guns, but that doesn’t mean that we should render ourselves undefended from threats, because others don’t know proper safety etiquette. Although many believe guns cause problems, guns prevent many horrible crimes from happening.

In order to have a peaceful community, and for everyone in society to feel safe again, we need more restriction on guns such as who handles guns, when they are handling a gun, and what they are needing the gun for. Violence is a part of history, that has always been talked about. We don’t need violence anymore, and not having restrictions on guns, is just making the violence worse. We need to know the problems that guns have caused in the past, and today, and the real reason why people who are against gun control.

A standout amongst the most warmed and talked-about about issues in this day and age is that of weapon control. In recent past years, there’ve been many cases reported in light of gun use. Since then there are debates going on either there should be gun control bills. There have been high quantities of passing’s including guns in the United States, and individuals are starting to stand firm against the savagery and search for approaches to take care of the issues. Firearm control is exacting stricter and more brutal directions on owning and conveying guns, which numerous individuals accept is the answer. In any case, arguers trust that the privilege to have firearms is a piece of each American 's sacred rights. Gun laws are the reason for much rough wrongdoing in America, and they should be changed to make it less demanding for Americans to buy handguns, convey them as hid weapons, and better protect themselves.