MBA 540 Final Exam 1. (10 pts.) Discuss how organizational architecture and corporate culture are related. Use an example of a real-life firm and discuss how its corporate culture blends with its organizational architecture. Organizational architecture and corporate culture should be intertwined within any successful company or organization. In the text, Brickley (2009), refers to organizational architecture as being three legs of a company: assignments of decision rights, 2) methods of rewarding individuals, and 3) the structure of systems to evaluate the performance of both individuals and business units. Organizational architecture is the framework of company departments such as managerial chain of command, the duty description and …show more content…
What is going on? Billy has some free-riders as co-workers. The scenario suggests that Billy is putting forth the effort in making decisions regarding the innovations in the company and putting in extra time while his colleagues are playing tennis. Billy, being in charge of technical development, feels as though his colleague’s lack of effort will delay any projects being worked on. A free-rider enjoys the benefits and efforts of others while not sharing in the costs of the effort. In Billy’s case, his fellow scientists will enjoy any credit or compensation received, from projects that come as a result of Billy’ hard work and long hours. From this example, it can be determined how damaging free-riding can be if not addressed or without having a good organization architecture and culture in place. 3. (10 pts.) Always Round Tire tries to base its promotions on seniority (where education and training requirements are not necessary). The company finds that this system seems to work most of the time with shop floor supervisors and team managers. But the system breaks down for higher-level positions. Why? The principle of seniority, used by Always Round, is easy to apply at the lower levels because of its being the most objective. This type of promotion system does not present a view of favoritism or nepotism, considering only age and experience. In a blue collar society, it is very much in-line with the established
These are the automatically computed results of your exam. Grades for essay questions, and comments from your instructor, are in the "Details" section below.
One of the major concerns for union representatives in negotiating collective bargaining agreements is job security for members the union represents. In order to ensure that this is captured in the collective bargaining agreements, the seniority clause is one of the provisions that have been factored-in in collective bargaining agreements. As per this provision, an employer is to take into consideration the length of service of an employee in making personnel decisions like promotions, termination of employment, and rehiring. Therefore, the seniority clause as espoused in a collective bargaining agreement is aimed at ensuring job security for employees represented by the union (Zwick, 2012).
Companies promote their employees everyday, but when the department heads are considering which employees to promote, what should they take into consideration? Should seniority be considered or equal opportunity, or should a promotion be based solely on the worker who is dedicated to doing excellent work everyday? These questions and more come up in our group study project on Morality of Employees and Employers.
In the case of individual and more senior roles, organisations will identify key roles and successors for these roles, focussing on providing the necessary experience, talent and development to ensure that they will succeed when reaching the senior management level in the future.
Assess the importance of the link between a healthcare organization's culture and its structure, relative to the successful implementation of its chosen strategy. Provide one example of such importance--or lack thereof--to support your position.
(10 pts.) Discuss how organizational architecture and corporate culture are related. Use an example of a real-life firm and discuss how its corporate culture blends with its organizational architecture.
The Commonwealth Fund, New York. (2006). US Medicare Prescription Drug Coverage. Retrieved from US Me
Some managers rotated the highest ranking between their employees from one year to the next. So the objective of developing new evaluation system was unfulfilled.
At the most senior levels, job rotation or management rotation, is closely linked with developing specific people to step into an existing job. In this situation the goal is to provide learning experiences and position prospective managers in area that allow them assume a higher level position in the future. While this practice is important to the growth of management in a business, this study will focus primarily on the rotation of junior management and workers.
'Where do you start with a project like this?' Katie wonders. 'Well', she think. 'I
The scarcity of growth opportunities is a topic of discussion for employees that like their jobs and the impact they make in the lives of the clients. The current promotion process is discouraging for those who want to grow (R. Dunleavy, personal communication, February 14, 2014). A recent initiative to become a learning organization is underway promising to develop current staff to grow into positions that would encourage expansions. However, current growth opportunities are limited and many open positions are unknown to majority of the staff. Simultaneously, there has been an increase in external recruitment for upper management positions, which was not made known internally. In addition, employees have been promoted into positions that previously did not exist without the opportunity for others to apply. Quite a few of the promotions occurred in the last 6 to 8 months and most recently staff have shared their frustration with the unjust process and several essential individual contributors left the company.
Forced ranking also known as the ‘stacking system’ is a performance rating system that has arguable attracted more attention over the years than any other (Smither & London 2009). While this practice has been widely used by well-known companies such as GE, Sun-Micro Systems and Hewlett-Packard (Grote 2005, cited in Smither & London 2009) it has also been the subject of significant controversy given its rejection by companies such as Xerox and PepsiCo (Olson & Davis 2003). Forced ranking is a performance rating approach synonymous with relative rating (Smither & London 2009). This implies that rather than being appraised independently against a uniform set of performance standards employees are ranked relative to peer performance and slotted into a normal distribution bell curve or a quartile distinction (Grote 2005). This would for example identify employees in the top and bottom 25 per cent (Grote 2005) and enable managers to identify the worst and best performing employees in an organisation. The use of forced ranking as a best practice people management scheme will be evaluated in the sections
The problem that needs to be solved here is the seniority versus performance issue based on the current
In order for one to evaluate and identify with the diverse business structures, he/she must be aware of the meaning and standards that makes that structure. Various businesses functions in different ways as the world is full of technology and new structures, company cultures and new ways in which companies are run. In order to fully grasp the concepts of Organizational structure and culture in the movies, I will use the Movie Up in the Air and The Devil Wear Prada movies to analyze a business scenario from them.
If the organizational norm is 'do your own thing ', then working together may not be valued and certainly not recognized and rewarded" (TPT)