Mcdonalds Appraisal System

The performance management system helps the company in identifying the employees who are not able to perform as per the expectations. Warnings can be given to these employees for improving their performance. Even after that they are not able to improve their performance; these employees can be terminated on the basis of performance. The organization keeps documentation about the performance of an employee. The company documents the performance in HR 's file. Employees in Organization are motivated and they value the structure of the company, its development and plan for growth. A motivated employee performs using full potential, which is good for both the organization and employee.

An appraisal is one of the most commonly used methods of formal assessment and is used to evaluate and assess the performance of an employee against agreed targets and objectives, with the aim of improving employee performance. Where an employee has been able to achieve their targets, the appraisal can be used to recognise successes. This often helps to increase an employee’s confidence and motivation and can lead to better organisational performance. Many organisations will use the outcomes of an appraisal to identify potential candidates for promotions or even an increase in pay. At the same time, an appraisal meeting may include discussions on underperformance, identifying why this has occurred and how this can be avoided in the future.

3600 feedback is a process in which someone’s performance is assessed and feedback is given by a number of people who may include their manager, subordinates, colleagues and customers (Michael Armstrong 2009:644). The debate surrounds a point of whether it offers a means of overcoming the traditional limitations of appraisal.

Although performance cannot be judge alone with 360-degree assessment, it provides a commentary aspect that will assist an organization in Leadership Development and Succession Planning. Including the 360-degree appraisal in the performance management process will provide a broader perspective about an employee’s performance and detail to annual appraisal. In addition, the technique facilitates greater self-development for an employee. Moreover, it enables an employee to compare his or her self- evaluation about performance with the perceptions of others.

An effective performance appraisal system supports our desire to create a productive, motivated, accountable, reliable, creative, dedicated, and happy workforce.

The second change is incorporating more than one performance related variable. Utley used one single question to determine performance. Utley needs to utilize several rating approaches to ensure accurate and reliable determinations. For example, by using summary ratings, a corporation can rate performance on a scale of 1 through 5 which covers several areas of skill, task, and efficiency. Summary labels measure current performance based on past performance; which can lead to effective future expectations and forecasts. And multirater assessments allow for a fair and accurate balance. Multirater assessments incorporate an active relationship with more than one assessor. For example, assessments are gathered not only by management, but also, co-workers, customers, and the employee themselves. This type of assessment can result in a valuable and motivational tool toward long term progress.

One stage in the management of performance system is when managers evaluate employees’ performances and provide them with feedbacks. One of the purposes of this stage is to identify employees’ strengths and weaknesses. As a result, managers should be able to identify performance and training gaps.

The measurement of employee’s performance is only internal. A good performance appraisal should have multiple raters, both internal and external.

Performance management relates to an organization’s ability to implement a system to evaluate and advance employee performance. Achieving peak performance requires consistency, clear objectives, and constructive employee evaluation. According to Mithas, Ramasubbu, & Sambamurthy (2011), an organization must design the performance management system based on extensive research about the organization’s mission, and then properly communicate the purpose of the system to employees, stakeholders, and decision makers. After the performing the research, the information should be used to establish the appropriate performance management specialized for the organization. In addition, an effective performance management system should align

* The individual’s performance and development should be seen as a joint partnership between the line manager and the individual. Development of goals and objectives which are incorporated into individual job descriptions, person specification and work situation’s provide performance level criteria.

A performance management system should consist of planning, monitoring, reviewing and evaluating (Hrcouncil.ca, 2015). During the planning phase management should identify, clarify and agree upon expectations of the employee. Also, in this phase management needs to determine how results will be measured, agree on the monitoring process and document the plan for performance management. Furthermore, this step is imperative for management to identify and ensure the performance objectives are explicitly stated to the employee. In the development of this phase management would

Performance management is one of the most important activities of HR. It is not enough to simply go through the business as usual and much disliked annual exercise of assessing performance and driving rewards based on a performance assessment. The information system will be drive and modifies goals as needed, assesses performance against goals, and provides instant feedback which will give them an indication of their strength and weaknesses thus focusing on skill development and motivate employees to stay with the organisation. However this may lead to Substitution of individual judgments and Challenge the nature of an organisation and the role of management

The newly designed system follows 4 point scale instead of 13 point scale which made the manager task easier in evaluation.

“Performance appraisals can enhance employee performance as well as advance the mission and goals of an organization. There are many advantages of performance appraisals if they are applied fairly, consistently and objectively. Performance appraisals not applied fairly can be counterproductive and even destructive to

Performance measuring is vital part which assessing value of employee and management. Performance can be measure through employee’s overall impact cost efficiency and effectives. (Anon., 2017)