Media During Ww1

* Glittering Generality- emotionally appealing words that are applied to a product or idea, but present no concrete argument or analysis.

Since the governments believed that a supportive home front was crucial to their countries' victory, they generally sought to keep the civilian spirits high and to depict the war in a positive light. With this motive in mind, governments engaged in the regulation and censorship of the forms of media, as well as the introduction of new methods of informing citizens through these media outlets.( Entertainment industry during World War II)

The radio was never used more—or for a much more important reason—than during World War I and World War II. Prior to the first world war war, many ships used the radio for communication. In the early part of the 20th Century, amplification was one of the top concerns of the development of the radio. Of course people were able to communicate with others hundreds of miles away, but the clarity and amplification of the messages weren’t necessarily as good as many had expected and counted on. Often times, other means of communication—like the telegraph—were better off being used instead of the radio. Because of that, Lee De Forest invented the Audion vacuum tube in 1906, and followed that up one year later by adding his triode tube. According to

The media plays a crucial role in covering the war in the most objective, bias-free and truthful

In the two essays “How the Media Helped Win World War II” and “In Defense of the Media,” both authors argue that the media is helpful in times of conflict. The influence of the media helped in times of conflict. In both passages, the positive part of the media was emphasized deeply. In the world today, media is just like banking career. They both want to make money.

A good starting point when trying to find the connections between soldiers from different nations is discovering and understanding why these soldiers enlisted to fight in the war along with understanding how the media’s filtering effects that. In the case of Paul Bäumer and his friends, they had a school teacher called Kantorek who, “during drill-time Kantorek gave us long lecture until the whole of [Paul’s] class went, under [Kantorek’s] shepherding, to the District Commandant and volunteered,” (Remarque 11). Paul even suggested those who didn’t volunteer risked being called “coward” because “at that time even one’s parents were ready with the word,” (Remarque 11). As Paul put it- “no one had the vaguest idea what we were in for” (Remarque 11), which could have been because of the filtering of the media on the war.

Can media help win – or lose – a war? Answer through detailed discussion of coverage in one war since 1945.

As each generation comes and goes, the things that define them come and go as well. In the late 1700’s and early 1800’s it was the Roman Catholic church, in the mid-1800’s to the early 1900’s it was technology and industrialization, then throughout the 1900’s it was war. Today and for the past ten plus years. Media has defined our generation. All types of media, social, news, mass, etc. is everywhere we look and it is how we see and perceive the world today. This is especially true when it comes to the perception of drugs in our society today. When one thinks of the word “drug” most of the time their first thought is not a good one. Media has shifted society into thinking that most drugs are bad and have no good qualities about them and that there are very few good drugs in the world today.

The essay “How the Media Helped Win World War II, shows that people were fired to do whatever to help the war efforts. For example, when the government asked to save fats from cooking to be used in making explosives, the United States recycled 538 million pounds of waste fats during the war. Also, when the nation was encouraged to plant victory gardens, a total of 50 million victory gardens was planted during the war years. “In Defense of the Media” shows that people were motivated to action by the violence they saw on television against blacks. It says, “Cameras were rolling on a peaceful march from Selma to Montgomery, held to protest the denial of African-American citizens’ right to vote,” and the essay cited Politician and Civil Rights leader John Lewis saying, “If it hadn’t been for the media—the print media and the television—the civil rights movement would have been like a bird without wings, a choir without a song.”

The news corporations during Vietnam no longer had to rely on the government to fly reporters out to the front, due to the new recourses corporations had. Since the media was no longer dependent on the government, news reporters no longer felt obliged to conform to the views of the government as a form of gratitude. The media had a profound effect on both the Vietnam War and World War II. During World War II, the media helped the war effort significantly. Through the promotion of war bonds, victory gardens, conservation and other pro war efforts, the media positively impacted not only the public opinion of the war, but also the fight itself. The media’s impact on Vietnam, on the other hand, was extremely detrimental to public support of the war. Analyzing the overall effect of media on both wars, the outstanding conclusion remains that the media, by influencing public opinions and action, has a significant effect on the outcome of war. In World War II, the government sailed to victory with the public at its back. Media encouraged citizens to enlist in the army, work in factories, and do whatever it takes at home to win. In Vietnam, the government’s withdrawal of troops only occurred after the majority of Americans realized that the U.S had failed its job of bringing democracy to the region. Through the presentation of the war in the media, Americans realized Vietnam was a lost cause. The anti-war movement grew in response to the portrayal of the war in the news, eventually effecting the decisions of policy makers. The course that media can take during a war can be as unpredictable as the war itself. While many factors account for the outcomes of armed conflict, the influence of the media remains a dominant one, exemplified by its diverse yet powerful effects on both World War II and the Vietnam

National campaigns used posters, cartoons, radio, magazines, and newspapers. The propaganda encouraged Americans to contribute to the war effort in any way they could in order to make the war successful." This piece of evidence proves that if the media hadn't been involved in filling people in on how to help, the war could've taken a drastic turn in the other direction. "Media propaganda had a profound impact on American opinions about WWII. It was effective at gaining support for the war and boosting citizen morale...the United States was able to lead the Allies to victory...". The media was able to influence people and how they helped in this crisis. If the citizens hadn't heard about how to help and/or what was going on, the war would've gone in a different

It was late in the evening and the battleship the Maine drifted calmly through the water of Havana to “protect Americas interests” stated be Fitzhugh Lee. Everything seemed to be looking bright with a new Spanish ruler in Cuba. Even many of the officers were entertained by the Spanish and thoughts of going home were in the air. The small battleship was second-class to that of its counterparts in the Pacific. It was the biggest battleship to enter the Havana harbor. As soon as the calm night appeared, roaring explosions and blinding flashes filled the air. Could the battleship Maine be under attack while on such great terms? Captain Sigsbee as he was writing a letter

The role and use of media cannot be neglected or underestimated in the modern day world. Military operations are manifestation of political goals and agendas, therefore requiring efficient media portrayal to affect and convince the people back home and all around the world. A military operation not properly conveyed to the nation turn victors into oppressors, the way it happened in Vietnam War with US military forces. Also, the morale of troops is badly affected when they see the negative portrayal of media regarding the battles they are fighting for their motherland. If military commanders are not well conversant with the media working, they would not be able to counter its negative effects or respond to it in an amicable

There have been many arguments, on whether the media can be a good source of information. By this people mean that media is either a primary force that brings good or bad. There are two stories that have the same view over media. Each one shows how the media is a good way to get the attention of listeners. One is In Defense of the Media, while the other is How the Media Helped Win World War II. In my opinion, I think that media can bring a primary good result when dealing with problems.

The BBC’s true rise to fame occurred during World War II. It’s role in the war was pivotal. The corporation helped boost morale through Reith’s original philosophy. The British Broadcasting Corporation contributed to the war effort during World War II by carrying out its mission of informing, educating, and entertaining the public. Through these values, the BBC proved crucial in leading Allied troops to victory.