Media..Its Social Responsibility and Ethics

The evolution of television content is currently steadily moving towards reality television shows. The shift from interest in fiction drama series to reality shows has turned the regular television viewers into addicted voyeurs. There have been diverse views on the effect of reality television shows ranging from support to criticism. George Will, in his article “Reality television: oxymoron” believes that reality television is making ordinary people degenerate morally and act stupid in the effort to please a disinterested audience. Reality TV shows are relying heavily on building extraordinary characters or events out of the norm and attract the attention of the audience. Kellner argues that the audience is enticed by “media constructs

There are many different opinions when the subject of reality television is discussed. Although reality television shows are thought to be negative they really are just mindless entertainment. Many can argue that these shows are misleading and disturbing. On the other side of this, people merely use these shows for entertainment and allow people to forget about stress in their lives. The cause of these different opinions is a result of different age, gender, religion, and race. The main purpose of these shows is simply to allow people to live vicariously through the characters. This excitement of being in other people’s lives is what makes reality television so addicting to people.

Although the best reasons for “going to the movies” are to be entertained and eat popcorn, understanding a film is actually quite complex. Movies are not only a reflection of life, they also have the capability of shaping our norms, values, attitudes, and perception of life. Through the media of film, one can find stories of practically anything imaginable and some things unimaginable. Movie-makers use their art to entertain, to promote political agendas, to educate, and to present life as it is, was, or could be. They can present truth, truth as they interpret it, or simply ignore truth altogether. A movie can be a work of fiction, non-fiction, or anything in-between. A film is an artist’s interpretation. What one takes away from a film depends upon how one interprets what has been seen and heard. Understanding film is indeed difficult.

In order to fit in to society, some people may modify their own actions based on the perceived reality of the TV show. It is easy to reality TV programs and the way they are perceived, could affect society as a whole.

Also, in many cases, the characters used in these shows are not ordinary individuals, but highly paid actors that simply recite scripts. Clearly, these shows are inaccurately labeled as “reality television,” and many individual’s time is wasted as a result. Time for many is very valuable. Wasting a person’s time because of an inaccurate description could be just as detrimental as wasting a person’s money because of an inaccurate description. Many people watch these shows to view real life situations, but what they are really viewing is the complete opposite. This cultivates confusion about what is real and what is fake.

Television was not at its best a decade ago, producers were struggling trying to figure out how it can reach to a broad audience and have them stay. Thanks to reality T.V, the television industry has not been the same ever since. Reality TV always get its viewers on the edge of their chair, from shows like The Bachelor, to other shows like Intervention, “all of them make you sit up and pay attention” (Poniewozik 1). Reality TV shows will do whatever it takes to get people to watch them. From a simple show called The Bachelor talking about love stories, to a show where they show a life of drug addict. They all presents a stories within, and sending a message to its viewers. What makes the viewer watches the show is the messages that the reality tv show trying to reach to its viewers.

The Cinema has became one of America’s favorite past times. The artistry and the technology has captured American audiences, giving films influence over our culture. The film industry can easily change people’s opinions, without much work Hollywood can make us hate the villains and love the heroes. Through this we see the power that the cinema industry has grown to have, and the influence it has in our society. However it is also our society who possess even greater influence over the film industry.

The show we have all watched at least once in our lifetime: The Bachelor. The show that women flock to every Monday night to see the hot bachelor, the dates, destinations, and of course, the drama. Even though most people have a love hate relationship with the show, we still tune in, live tweet about it and, maybe go to Reality Steve to see who ends up with the Bachelor. We would like to think that the reality tv shows we love to watch are actually real? There not necessarily real but they are hyperreal. Hyperreality can be called the “Authentic Fake” -Umberto Eco. It's the tactic of shaping the tv show to make audiences

This essay will assess the debate on whether or not reality television is becoming more like a form of tabloidization; whether, reality TV has shifted from to entertaining the audience rather than educating the audience. John Corner believes that television has greatly expanded its range of images, depicting more of the ‘real’. He added that the shift in reality TV has employed factual programming, such as an increase in documentaries. On the other hand, Richard Kilborn believes that reality TV is a simulation of real life events through various forms of dramatic reconstruction… ’Documentaries can never be any more than a representation or an interpretation of events and issues in the real world’ (Kilborn, 5). Therefore, programs can be

Media is a very important aspect of human life. It 's images heavily influence our behavior. More importantly, it keeps us within the current lingo of society and allows us to feel more connected with the people around us. However, not all of the concepts the media portrays is good, considering the fact that sexual images and violence is swarming the airwaves. A Surgeon General even reported last year that violence is in a grand total of 61% in the media 's content. Despite all of these negative criticisms, people take the media for granted and do not look into the media that do contain intellectual ideals. It can be really interesting to research whether or not some of this scientific content is true. Our group decided to use the movie

Reality TV shows know exactly what kind of entertainment to display that will keep the audience hooked. For example, there is a reality TV show that is called “Love & Hip-Hop” and on this show every female is abused, messy, or egotistical. The director has scenes of drug abuse, alcohol, relationship advice and everyday problems. These things tend to hook the audience in because of the negatives of everything. For instance, we tend to tune in on the news only to hear “today on 3000 block of NW Houston a

For close to a decade, the ethics behind the existence of reality TV have been questioned. While there are ardent viewers of reality TV, researchers and other scholars disapprove them, and claim that the world would have been in a better place. Reality TV shows, especially in America, are extremely profitable to media owners, and this has increased their popularity in the recent years. The main target audience for these shows are teenagers and women, who spend a lot of time discussing about them, even hours after the shows. Most of the reality shows in America and other parts of the world have common ideas. The most fundamental aspect of most reality TV shows is that they display people who go through embarrassing, painful and humiliating ordeals. This is what the reality shows expect their audiences to be entertained, and presumably laugh at the situations the people go through. For this reason and many more, it has been found that they are more detrimental than entertaining to the society, and therefore, the world would be in a better place without them (Pozner 89-91).

After reading article one, Why Reality TV Doesn’t suck, and May Even Make Us Smarter, I can say I fully agree with this article. The writer of this article is Grant McCracken, an anthropologist who has studied American culture and business for over two decades. “Reality TV is often perceived as a “vast wasteland.” Society say it’s uncouth, desperate, and lawless.” (McCracken 1). The start of Reality TV started when regular television just became dull, writers wanted to make a story for viewers to watch that was unpredictable. Reality TV can be manipulated by producers and still no one quite knows where things will end up. This makes Reality shows fascinating and sometimes even maybe uncomfortable for some viewers. Grant McCracken states, once people believe what is true about themselves, we can begin to figure out what is really going on in this culture. In this case, the surface says, “Reality TV is a dumbing down.” But the secret says “not always.” Sometimes, Reality TV contributes to smartening up (2). I can relate to this statement because whenever I watch Reality TV shows like, Keeping Up with the Kardashians,

There is general recognition of the fact that journalists have responsibilities not only vis-à-vis their own convictions but also towards the public. Summarily, four kinds of responsibility may be defined: contractual responsibility in relation to the media and their internal organisation, a social responsibility entailing obligations towards public opinion and society as a whole, responsibility or liability deriving from the obligation to comply with the law and responsibility towards the international community, relating to respect of universal values. These four types of responsibilities may in certain respects be contradictory or even conflicting.

The arrival of home-video however had an opposite impact. And it was just a beginning of the whole technological revolution that will completely turn people’s film watching habits upside down. Film viewing was taken into the comfort of the home space with the arrival of television. However the capabilities that home-video, followed by DVD-s, Blu-rays, Netflix and all the other VOD services, were a true breakthrough for the film buffs. This change on one hand inaugurated a completely new stage of cinema’s relocation to multiple other platforms, on the other ripped off the cult, quasi-religious facet of cinema going and spectatorship. In 1996 a New York Times published an article by Susan Sonntag “The Decay of Cinema”, in which she announced the end of cinephilia. She wrote: