preview

Media Misrepresentss The Nature Of Crime

Decent Essays

A large number of articles nowadays consistently debates about the way crime is shown throughout the media is in fact incredibly different from what official research and other records tell us, this is showing how the media misrepresents the nature of crime. Below will provide an overview of how the media misrepresent evidence for real-life crime and how they do this. It is seen that the media is the public’s primary source about crime and this has helped to the exploitation of the inaccuracy with presenting the nature of crime.
The first argument will be showing and supporting that media twists the nature of certain crimes. The misrepresentation of crime is able to be shown through what the media deem to be ‘newsworthy’. The media report …show more content…

Weatherburn, Matka and Land (1996) stated that the media has created such a difference between the real levels of crimes, violent crimes in general and what the community perceive them to be due to the manipulation of the media upon the nature of crime. For example, in Australia the statistics for homicide have remained at similar and decreasing results for the past couple of decades (Chappell, 2008), whereas the public believe there has been a rise in violent crimes within this time period. Study done from the Australian Bureau of Statistics found that there were numerous differences between media reported crime and the results of the real crimes. The information above is showing that crimes in Australia such as homicides, abductions and robbery have been misrepresented by the media for the public to believe these crimes are at a higher rate than they are actually …show more content…

The media have misrepresented the nature of this crime to make the community believe that these crimes are committed by strangers when in reality they are mostly committed by a family member or a known other. For example, males are likely to be victimised by a family member (45%) or someone else known to them (36%) (Hayes H, Prenzler, 2009, p.108). In contrast, it is shown that almost three quarters of female victims are in fact assaulted by a family member or a known other (72.4%) (Hayes H, Prenzler, 2009, p.106). A prime example of how the media misrepresents the nature of these crimes and create an image of stranger danger which makes the public believe that strangers predominantly commit these crimes (Chappell, 2008). Accordingly, the media’s misrepresentation of sexual assault cases has led to the myth of stranger danger which has led to the thought that these crimes are committed by strangers and that victims don’t know their

Get Access