In category IV, agar plates were used containing differential and selective aspects to determine the unknown bacterium. The first media test was the EMB. EMB separates fecal coliforms that are produced through carbohydrates that are fermentable, such as sucrose and lactose. The different fecal coliforms represent the differential factor of this test, while the selective factor selects against gram positive organisms. Lactose fermenters appear purple, pink, blue, and black colonies, while non-lactose fermenters appear clear to light orange. This occurs because Eosin Y and methylene indicators react at low pH forming the purple precipitate. On the other hand, vigorous fermenters appear metallic green indicate either coliform production or lactose …show more content…
The selectivity for halophiles refers to a bacterium’s ability to grow in a salt environment. The media differentiated between mannitol fermenters and non-fermenters. The yellow agar meant that the bacterium was a fermenter, whereas no color change meant that the bacterium was not a fermenter. In Table 1, the test observed growth of colonies and a pink agar. The growth indicated that the bacterium represented a halophilic nature, while the pink agar indicated no fermentation of mannitol. Research discovered that E. coli had no growth of colonies and no change in media. Therefore, E. coli was ruled out. Also, B. megaterium and E. faecalis were discovered to have yellow medias from being able to ferment mannitol. However, in this lab, the unknown bacterium did not ferment mannitol. As a result, all the potential bacteria did not fit the expected results, so this test did not work. In the end, category IV tests did not represent helpful information that would help identify the unknown bacterium, since the bacterium indicated different observations compared to expected observations for eosin methylene blue agar and mannitol salts agar. A possible source of error of these two tests could have been that the bacterium was contaminated due to improper inoculation techniques, such as not using a loop that was completely
An unknown bacterium was handed out by Dr. Honer. The appropriate tests were prepared and applied. The first procedure that was done was the gram stain. Under a microscope, if the gram stain is purple, the bacterium is gram positive, if the stain is red, it is gram negative. The next test was the fermentation tests for glucose, sucrose and
The purpose of this lab was to identify an unknown bacteria culture using differential tests. The identification of the unknown culture was accomplished by identifying the bacteria based on its specific metabolic characteristics and morphology. It is suggested that culture 11 is a sample of Enterobacter aerogenes.
The purpose of this lab was to identify two unknown bacteria from a mixed culture. The reason for identification of unknown bacteria was to help students recognize different bacteria through different biochemical tests and characteristics. This is important in the medical field because identification of unknown bacteria can help treat a patient by knowing the contributing source of a disease. Also knowledge of different bacteria helped others make antibiotics used today. This lab was completed by using the methods learned thus far in identification of bacteria.
The first result of importance was the result of the Gram stain. The observations of the unknown bacteria from the slant culture after Gram staining showed that the unknown bacteria were Gram negative bacilli (Image 1). After determining the unknown bacteria was Gram negative, an oxidase test was conducted on a sample from the slant culture. The cotton swap with the sample of bacteria did not change color when the oxidase reagent was applied, thus providing a negative result. With a negative oxidase test, further tests were conducted to determine various characteristics of the unknown bacteria. A MR-VP broth was inoculated with a sample from a slant culture of unknown bacteria. After incubation, the methyl red reagent was added to the broth, and the broth turned red, providing a positive result (Image 2). An EMB agar streak plate was inoculated with a sample from a slant culture of the unknown bacteria, and after incubation, growth was found on the plate, providing a positive result (Image 3). A Citrate agar slant was inoculated, and after incubation, growth was found on the media, providing a positive result (Image 4). A Urea agar slant was inoculated, and after incubation, the agar had changed from a peach color to a bright pink color, providing a positive result (Image 5). Using the flowchart (Figure 1) developed from the Table of Expected Results, the lab partners started at the oxidase test. Given the negative result of the oxidase test, the flowchart is
I identified Citrobacter freundii, the gram negative rod, by running a series of tests. I began with the Phenol Red Lactose tests, which tests if the organism contains various enzymes that determine if it can ferment lactose. The broth turned yellow after it was incubated, indicating that the lactose was fermented to acid, and there was also gas present in the Durham tube. Since the Phenol Red Lactose Test was positive, I then ran the Phenol Red Sucrose test, which tests if the bacteria contain different enzymes that determine if sucrose can be fermented. After incubation, the broth was yellow, indicating that sugar was fermented to acid, and there was also gas present in the Durham tube. Next, I ran the Sulfide Production, Indole Formation, Motility test, but I was only testing for Hydrogen Sulfide Production to differentiate between the organisms Citrobacter freundii and Enterobacter aerogenes. This test detects if the organisms can metabolize sulfur into hydrogen sulfide, which is revealed by the formation of ferrous sulfide that causes blackening around the growth. The test also reveals if the organism can break tryptophan into indole or migrate away from initial stab area. After incubation, the agar slant was completely black, indicating that the organism produces hydrogen sulfide and is motile proving that it was Citrobacter
Often scientists work with bacteria that do not come in a labeled test tube— for example, bacterial samples taken from infected human tissue or from the soil—and the scientist must then identify the unknown microorganism in order to understand what behavior to expect from the organism, for example, a certain type of infection or antibiotic resistance. However, because of the relatively few forms of bacteria compared to animals and because of the lack of bacterial fossil records due to their asexually reproductive nature, the taxonomy used to classify animals cannot be applied to bacteria (Brown 275). In order to classify unknown bacteria, a variety of physiological and metabolic tests are available to narrow a sample down from the fathomless number of possibilities into a more manageable range. Once these tests have been performed, the researcher can consult Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, a systematically arranged and continually updated collection of all known bacteria based on their structure, metabolism, and other attributes.
The purpose of this lab was to identify two unknown bacteria cultures using various differential tests. The identification of these unknown cultures was accomplished by separating and differentiating possible
|EMB Agar | |Distinguishes bacteria that ferment |Dark blue colonies with|E. coli and P. |
A Dichotomous Key was studied to identify bacteria and their relationships. Some of the organisms at the end of the Dichotomous Key had viable characteristics that separate them from different groups, and those that did not students learned how to further classify them. A Dichotomous Key is used to narrow down the search for the unknown organism tested. It is organized by phenotypic characteristics of organisms and conducts a systematic way of identifying the other unknowns. In the lab students were given a tube labeled with a number. Instructions were given to conduct a Gram stain to begin the search followed by the use of a Dichotomous Key and photos as resources to carry out the search. Instructions read to isolate and identify the unknown bacterium with both differential and selective tests to positively identify the given unknown organism. Differential tests used specifically for this unknown microorganism was BEA (Bile Esculin Agar), which interpreted results by the hydrolysis of esculin when the media is blackened around
There are many reasons for knowing the identity of microorganisms. The reasons range from knowing the causative agent of a disease in a patient, so as to know how it can be treated, to knowing the correct microorganism to be used for making certain foods or antibiotics. This study was done by applying all of the methods that have been learned so far in the microbiology laboratory class for the identification of unknown bacteria. The identification process can be completed with a series of deferential stains and biochemical tests. Creating a dichotomous key helps to limit the amount of biochemical tests done on an unknown organism and by observation
The main idea of this experiment was to correctly identify the unknown bacteria, #3. Identification of unknown bacteria yields multiple benefits in many different areas in the research of microorganisms. In this experiment I performed many different test dealing with things such as the presence of enzymes, fermentation abilities and different chemical reactions. Observations made from the tests were then compared to a gram negative unknown chart in order to identify the bacteria. Based off of my results and the chart, I concluded the bacteria #3 was the bacteria Escherichia coli. E. coli is most commonly found in the intestines of warm blooded organisms. Most E. coli strands are non pathogenic however, there are strands
A fecal coliform test uses a statistical method to determine the most probable number (MPN) for both coliforms and E. coli in the water sample. Three different medias were used: lauryl tryptose broth (LTB), brilliant green lactose bile (BGLB), EC (E. coli) broth. For our results, we obtained 15 positive results for the LBT media. These positive results were found in the neat sample, and additional dilution samples. There were no positive results found for the EC broth and BGLB tests. The EC and BGLB media contains lactose that coliforms use to ferment and produce gas. Additionally, these media types contain ingredients which strongly inhibit the growth of non-coliforms. There were no indications in these tests that fermentation occurred because there was no presence of gas found in the Durham
In addition to the decreased in pH, the color and texture of the sample also changed as time passed. Instead of the initial color of milk, the sample turned into a milky mixture that contains both a solid and liquid part. As for two agar plates, MRS and ST that were inoculated with yogurt sample, there was some growth on both plates. Through further observations, the colony on each plate was shown to have distinct morphology, cell shape and gram stain. For the colony on MRS plate, it was determined to be Lactobacillus, because it is a Gram-positive bacillus. As for the colony on the ST plate, it was determined to be S. thermophilus, since it is a Gram-positive
The purpose of this experiment is to identify yogurt unknown by analyzing the result of its gram staining, and the 6 tubes of test media that was inoculated. The yogurt chosen to be used in this lab meets the minimum number of lactic acid bacteria to bear the seal of “Live & Active Cultures,” which mean they have at least 10^8 colony-forming units(CFU) per gram to quality. Unknown “ ” is Gram positive, rod-shaped, and use salicin, galactose, sucrose, mannitol, and mannose for fermentation. The characteristics of the result suggest that the unknown “ ” can be identified as Lactobacillus casei.
2. Introduction: Each student was given unknown bacteria and was instructed to perform a variety of experimental tests that would help to identify their bacteria. During the process of identification, the unknown bacteria was added to many different testing medias using aseptic technique. They are as follows: lactose fermentation on eosin methylene blue (EMB), TSI (Triple Sugar Iron agar), Phenol red sucrose, the SIM test, H2S by SIM, IMViC (indole, motility, voges-proskauer, and citrate), Urease (urea broth), PDase (Phenylalanine Deaminase), Lysine Decarboxylase, and Ornithine Decarboxylase. Colonial morphology on EMB was used to