Medical Error On Physician. Samantha Diaz . Carrington

Treatment without consent - Charlotte, the nurse on duty, had forced James into getting the injections therefore causing him emotional distress. Treating a competent patient who has validly refused treatment could constitute an assault or battery. The legal provisions supporting a competent patients’ right to refuse treatment in Australia can be found in both legislation throughout all the States and common law. The Australian Charter of Healthcare Rights is also a helpful source of guidance as it reinforces the common law position that is based upon the principle of patient autonomy. The High Court of Australia first articulated the principle or refusal of treatment in Marion’s case, stating that a legally competent person has a right “to choose what occurs with respect to his or her own person.” Under the NSW Health Patient Charter, consent in regard to an operation, procedure or treatment is both a specific legal requirement and an accepted part of good medical practice. Medical practitioners are also expected to clearly explain proposed treatment, and adequately inform their patients on significant risks and alternatives associated with the treatment.Failure to do this could result in legal action for assault and battery against a practitioner who performs the procedure. Charlotte made no effort to explain or gain a consent from James.

Medical assistance (MA), is one of the largest growing jobs in the United Stated (Chapman, & Blash, 2017). The role of MA has increased over years from just escorting patients to exam rooms, and taking vital signs to now a boarder role which includes phlebotomist or radiologic technician (Chapman, & Blash, 2017). MA are hired in primary care to assistance the doctors and nurses in caring for patients. The Bureau of Labor Statistics has defined the role of medical assistance by using the special code that is regulated by each state (Chapman, & Blash, 2017). There is no place is this regulation that gives MA the right to prescribe medication. What Stephanie did was not in her job description.

One of the most critical factors which contribute to the number of preventable cases of healthcare harm is the culture of silence surrounding these cases. The fear of medical providers to report incidences is related to the possibility of punishment and liability due to a medical error (Discovery, 2010). The criminalization of some acts of medical error has resulted in job dismissal, criminal charges and jail time for some healthcare workers. This is despite the fact that the system they are working in helped to create the situation which led to the error in the first place. Human error, due to fatigue and system errors can result in deadly consequences, but by criminalizing the error it effectively shuts down the ability to correct the root problem. Healthcare workers, working at all levels within the medical system, can provide valuable input on how to improve the processes and prevent harm from occurring (Discovery, 2010).

This application paper provides a summary of Professional Liability for a Paramedic and EMS personnel in general. We forget (omissions) to perform a needed task or skill and we make mistakes or professional errors for whatever reason when performing our duty in the name of doing no harm. The incident (the liable act) may be minor and reversible; on the other hand it might just be hell’s payday with lawsuits and court dates. A professional liability can cause severe injury to a patient, both patient and care provider and might also include a civilian or two in the mix. Professional Liability can lead to

There are two common ways to handle a medical error. One is by blaming the individual or things when the error occurs, called it the “culture of blame”. The other one is by focusing on the safety goal using effective systems and teamwork, called “culture of safety". We may say that one is more applicable than the other, or maybe one is more beneficial than the other. In real life though, only one can be applied in a healthcare system, the one that is proven effective regardless its origin, pragmatic, or .

The case study of Crowe v. Provost, 374 S. W. 2d. 645 (Tenn. 1963), was a highly-anticipated court case for the 1960’s. The following list pertaining to the example of what went wrong and by whom. The first patient appointment opens a file with the patient’s basic information and any allergies including medication(s). This would typically be done with the receptionist. If this was not the doctor’s first time seeing this patient, then the physician should have checked the chart to see if there were any allergies to anything including medication, such as, Penicillin and Cosa-Terrabon. Referring to the Crowe vs. Provost, the child was then rushed back into the doctor’s office with worsening symptoms, the nurse should have listened to the mother. The nurse, could have instructed the mother to take the worsening child to the nearest Emergency Department. The nurse advising the doctor, “That she thought the child was about the same as when the physician saw him earlier in the day” (Flight, M., 2011, page 5-6) was not a good idea. The doctor could have been brought in for an examination of the ailing patient. The receptionist returning from her lunch should not have been a signal for the nurse to leave for any reason with the patient getting worse. Again, the patient and mother should have been instructed to go to the nearest emergency room. The receptionist should not have been left alone with an ailing patient. Mistakenly, the receptionist calling the doctor first and

Especially since she was just trying to know that her husband would not be hurt by mowing the lawn. Based on what I have learned thus far in the class, I know that no matter how ridiculous the concern may sound I need to respect the patient and allow them to voice their concern. I would have listen to the wife of the patient and would have reassured her that while I know that she is worried about her husband he should be okay to mow the lawn and then I would have ended the conversation by letting the patient’s wife know that if she or her husband have any other worries or questions that they could contact me. The ethical lesson that is to be learned from Dr. McKee’s unethical error is that patients and their family members need to be treated with dignity because they are trusting the physician with their life and that should not be taken for granted.

University Hospital is a well known hospital with a level 1 trauma treatment center for the tri-county area of a northwestern state, the hospital enjoys the fact they are known for their promising reputation among healthcare professionals and the public they serve. Jan Adams is an OR supervisor that has been working there for ten years, as a professional she makes surgeons follow protocol as required and enjoys working with trauma patients. One Friday night, which is the busiest day of the week for the trauma department; the unit was notified that a helicopter was on its way with a 42 year old man who had been in a car accident. Shortly after the patient arrived to the trauma center, the resident and other medical staff noted that he was in very bad physical conditions, needed immediate surgery or otherwise he was going to die. The issue was that the on call surgeon had to be present during the surgery and had not yet arrived, but regardless of the matter and protocol they proceeded with medically treating the patient immediately. The concern is that in doing so they violated medical procedures and put the patients safety at risk, this lead to a long list of ethical issues for example, patient well-being, impaired healthcare professional, adherence to professional codes of ethical conduct, adherence to the organization’s mission statement, ethical standards, and values statements, management’s role and responsibility, failure

Keeping patients safe is essential in today’s health care system, but patient safety events that violate that safety are increasing each year. It was only recently, that the focus on patient safety was reinforced by a report prepared by Institute of medicine (IOM) entitled ” To err is human, building a safer health system”(Wakefield & Iliffe,2002).This report found that approx-imately 44,000 to 98,000 deaths occur each year due to medical errors and that the majority was preventable. Deaths due to medical errors exceed deaths due to many other causes such as like HIV infections, breast cancer and even traffic accidents (Wakefield & Iliffe, 2002). After this IOM reports, President Clinton established quality interagency

The definition of malpractice according to Merriam-Webster dictionary is dereliction of professional duty or a failure to exercise an ordinary degree of professional skill or learning by one rendering professional services which results in injury, loss, or damage. The nurse did have a professional duty which including following her medication rights, administering the drug correctly after consent had been obtained, and documenting the events clearly and precisely. There could have possibly been a breach in professional duty regarding the choice of injection site. This is dependent on the time period of which the medication was administered and the evidence and practices at that current

As with all emergency situations we attend our number one priority is safety and being aware of any potential danger on scene. Responsibility for safety is everybody’s individual duty and covers myself, my colleagues, the patient, relatives and any other agencies attending the scene. The Health and Safety at Work Act (1974) states I should take reasonable care for my own health and safety and also for others who may be affected by my actions or omissions. At this particular incident everything was safe.

In this essay “When Doctors Make Mistakes” Atul Gawande (1999) talks about the day when he made a mistake as a doctor. He writes everything that he did step by step to show what he did wrong. He talks about how tried to open her airway and couldn’t so he had attending come help him. He also talks about the patient barely surviving and how the attending had to tell the family that the patient was alive but in a critical condition. He then goes on and talks about other mistakes physicians have made but admits that “all doctors make terrible mistakes” (p.385).

Errors occur in health care as well as every other very complex system that involves human beings. The message in “To Err is Human”, by Archie Cochrane, was that preventing death and injury from medical errors requires dramatic, system wide changes. Health care professionals have customarily viewed errors as a sign of an individual’s incompetence or recklessness. As a result, rather than learning from such events and using information to improve safety and prevent new events, health care professionals have had difficulty admitting or even discussing adverse events often because they fear professional censure, administrative blame, lawsuits, or personal feelings of shame.

Yes, I agree, the supervisor should have contacted another provider immediately after she did not hear from Dr. Spalding. It was a negligence that she waited for three hours for the doctor to arrive. I believe that every hospital has a protocol in placed for a situation like this. It seems like the supervisor did not care about that either.

Answer: As a part of a high-reliably organization, I am committed to 200% accountability and safety as the number one goal. Over the past year as an Informaticist, I have consistently advocated for patient safety and safe workflows. As an example, a new staff endocrinologist made a request to update the Insulin Basal Bolus Correction order set that was not evidence-based. I met with the endocrinologist to review the current practice guidelines per America Diabetes and Endocrinology Associations. During our discussion. the endocrinologist did not realize that there was the ability within the order set to make the desired changes to individualize the care and orders