Medical Ethics Case Study

One of the main ethical issues that faces health care is the security of patient information. This information is protected by laws and regulations such as HIPPA, but there are still concerns Scott, et al, 2005). Among those concerns is the new concept of electronic patient records and information. These records are designed to help hospitals and doctors get patient information more quickly, so that patients can receive treatment as soon as possible. Unfortunately, anything kept and transmitted on a computer has the potential to be hacked, so that is a serious concern for patients. Not all patients want their medical records to be available electronically, but they may not have too many options (Romano & Stafford, 2010). Opting out may not be an option for them, and if they do have that option it could reduce the speed and quality of treatment that these patients would receive. Do they want to risk that, just so they can feel as though their medical information is better protected?

This paper will breakdown the difference between clinical and institutional ethics. How this can cause conflict between healthcare and society. Thus, providing an example of how healthcare professionals can be conflicted when trying to provide the best quality care or a compassionate treatment outcome.

In today’s health care industry, mechanical restraints are often used to maintain patients’ behavior and ensure their safety when treating the elderly and the severely ill (Gatsmans & Milisen, 2006). There are many variations of mechanical restraints, but all are defined as “any device, material or equipment attached to or near a person 's body and which cannot be controlled or easily removed by the person and which deliberately prevents or is deliberately intended to prevent a person 's free body movement to a position of choice and/or a person 's normal access to their body” (Gatsmans & Milisen, 2006, p.

Medical ethics and legal issues have been a key topic in medical field for many years now. It is important for medical professionals to understand the importance of the way we care for patients, it is therefore important to be knowledgeable and aware of the medical ethics and legal issues that govern good patient care. Health care professionals must make decisions based on ethical and legal issues to performance their regular duties. However, Medical ethics is not only about avoiding harm to patients. It is rather a norms, values and principles (Ethical theories 2015). Therefore norms, values and principles are intended to govern medical ethical conduct. Ethics is defined as “a standard of behaviour and a concept of right and wrong beyond what the legal consideration is in any given situation”. In another words medical ethics is a discipline that used to handle moral problems coming out the care of patients. Law is another important discipline that often comes together with medical ethics. Law defined as a “rule of conduct or action prescribed or formally recognized as binding or enforced by a controlling authority”. Government imply law to keep the society running smoothly and to control behaviour that could threaten public safety. Medical professionals have to often prioritise these terms before making any clinical decision. The following findings will constructively emphasise on medical ethics, its

After review the table l decided not to disclose any information because the harm was more than benefit. Based on the information provided the percentage of infection is very small. The side effective of action is more harmful because the company might close down and coworker will lose job, so many lawsuits in court from previous patients, I will not be able to support my family because l won’t have a job.

The argument regarding the selling of organs on the black market has been an ethical and medical controversy for decades. The problems that exists ethically is to be believed that putting a price on a human organ is materialistic, people may go to extremes to donate a kidney, and the fear of the spread of infections or diseases. Although the fears are natural, mostly because people have always associated the black market with a negative connotation, the ethical fears out-weigh the idea that donating a kidney can save a person’s life (Taylor, 2006). To make an accurate assumption about organs on the black market, both the positives and negatives need to be evaluated, this paper analyzes both positions regarding the issue and proposes that

While private hospitals tend to be the preferred choice because they are not as limited in their budget and are known for quality service in which patients receive individual care

In current medical settings, complex ethical dilemmas do arise as a "result of advancing treatment techniques and increasingly diverse patient value systems” (Ito & Natsume, 2016). After reviewing the case, it is clear that there is an ethical dilemma and it can be seen from different perspectives. The dilemma is if the 6-year-old child should be given treatment or not by the physician in the hospital, without the consent of the child’s mother. The doctor who diagnosed the child with meningitis is in a dilemma. The professional ethics in medicine require that physicians should undertake the diagnosis and treatment of their patient, however, they should not administer treatment without the consent of their patient. In this case, since the patient is a minor child, the consent must be sought from the parents. The child’s mother is a Christian scientist and not the child’s biological parent. On religious grounds, she insists that the child should not receive any medical treatment. Upon asking for permission, the biological father consents to the treatment and seeks independent consultation from another physician. He is ethically right in asking for the treatment of his child. Otherwise, his child would not receive the treatment needed; the father has a right to assure the well-being of his biological child. At the same time, the school also has an assumed an ethical responsibility to make sure the child 's meningitis has received the proper

Perhaps the toughest feedback I have ever received came from a well-respected physician who was unsatisfied with his electronic medical records that I prepared for him as a medical scribe. In the middle of a demanding shift, I was confronted about my documentation in which I did not document in a way that was focused on ensuring ‘Level 5’ charting. In other words, the physician gave me feedback on my charting methods and asked me to change the way in which I documented his interactions so that the hospital would receive the most compensation. This request proposed an ethical dilemma for myself as I had observed every interaction between the physician and his patients and knew that my documentation was a genuine attempt to accurately record

I work for a government run medical center.  As an organization we are run by government oversight, rules and regulations and high-powered patient complaints.  If a provider is not ethically oriented they will be found out and dismissed quickly.  The flip side of the coin, most people work at this medical center because they enjoy their work and the patient population.  We work well with one another and come together overall for the common good.  There are no incentives which can lead to ethical misconduct.   Additionally, physicians have their own code of ethics.  The Hippocratic Oath, is a set of principles for physicians’ conduct, which aim to protect the rights of the patient and oblige the physician voluntarily to behave in an altruistic manner towards patients (Riddick, 2003).  The four basic principles of medical ethics (autonomy, justice, beneficence and non-maleficence) form the foundation for health professionals to guide and decide what practices are ethical. These basic ethical principles are based on the major documents of healthcare ethics (Hippocratic Oath, Nuremberg code and Helsinki declaration).  Future doctors and nurses are expected to learn and abide by these

The physician can withdraw form a case, he or she just have to do it in a legal, ethical way. A physician must write out a statement to the patient stating they are withdrawing care. The physician can make referrals for other physicians but it is important that they allow the patient enough time to find a new health care provider. A physician can have legal actions taken against him if he or she withdraw from a case due to unethical reasons, such as not providing care to a patient because the third party disagrees with paying the bill. It is also important to note that the patient is allowed to withdraw from the case without notice but the physician and his office must withdraw from a case in writing (Fremgen, 2016).

There are many different ethical issues in the medical field. One is being patient confidentiality. A patient’s medical issues or records are considered private. Speaking of these in public is a violation. Another is patient relationship.

Morality plays a huge role in the health care field. This principle of right and wrong conduct is noteworthy to specialists while assessing the benefits and troubles of medical procedures. One may find the progress of helpful advances hard to endure. For example, using a piece of vitro arrangement to pick babies for an impeccable inherited human cloning. If we screen an incipient organism for a tissue sort, we can then allow certain physical qualities for the newborn child. We can pick their eye shading, kind of learning, physicality, and capacity that could propose our babies regardless, consummate in a perfect world society. Inherited

When selecting members for an ethics committee, the health care organization needs to include individuals who have experienced in addressing ethical matters and represent from a diverse viewpoint. Members must have a knowledge and interpersonal skills. Committee members can include physicians, nurses, psychiatry, social workers, chaplains, department managers, board members, lawyers, and even patient representatives (Pearlman, 2013). The author also suggests that all ethic committee members should take the responsibility to learn how the procedure of ethical analysis work and the arguments surrounding the right change. Furthermore, members of the committee are required to maintain the confidentiality of the information discuss and sign an oath (Pearlman, 2013).

An excellent initial post for this week's discussion. Using at least two patient identifiers when administering medications to a patient is crucial. I agree with you that the five rights of medications should be implemented every time you are administering medications. At the hospital, I currently work at if the patient is competent we always ask them to tell us their name and date of birth, then we look at the information printed on their identification bracelet. This bracelet is given to them upon admission to the hospital. The information provided by the patient and the information gathered by observing the patient's hospital bracelet is then used to identify that the right patient is present. We then use this medication against the