Allie
1/6/16
Medical Experimentation Opinion Essay
I think medical experimentation is somewhat cruel. Obviously, the monster didn’t want to be alive throughout Frankenstein, as he was an experiment, and he makes it very clear.
In real life, people who have undergone serious physical medical experimentation can end up having medical complications further on in life. People have filed lawsuits against people who medically experimented on them, and there are many law firms who fight for this sort of thing. I end up feeling sorry for people who ended up having complications after certain procedures. Part of me can’t ignore the serious experiments on human beings or animals.
I know that creating life from inanimate objects is impossible for humans
…show more content…
If it’s an experiment that could potentially put a human life in danger, and there’s a backup plan if something should go wrong, that’s a little iffy, but it’s ok to an extent. If there’s no backup plan, and the experiment is designed to see if the human lives through, or ends up dying, and the experiment doesn’t let necessary interference in to help the test subject if they’re about to die, that’s not ok. A lot of the time, those types of experiments are designed to let the subject suffer if they would die in the first place. I don’t understand why they would let the subject die, unless they plan to do an autopsy, but even then, it’s still a little over the …show more content…
It doesn’t matter what species of animal it is, whether it be a dog, a pig, or even a mouse, the animals don’t have the ability to understand what’s going on, or even have a say in the matter. They may struggle for freedom, but most of the time, it fails.
Experimentation on animals is pretty much just as bad as the slaughter house. The animals in slaughter houses are knocked onto their sides, onto a conveyor belt, and then, since they can’t get up, they are sent into a machine that slices up their bodies, while they are still alive!
Experimentation can be just as cruel. Most of the time, they test medicines meant for humans on animals, like pigs, and the results end up making these poor animals suffer, because the medicine can cause problems if it’s meant for one specific disease. Most of the time, the animals being tested on aren’t going to have that disease, and so it causes other severe complications, that could end up killing
Potential grave consequences that can result from irresponsible, or criminal, medical experiments. While we must be vigilant to protect innocent victims from such experimentation we cannot let that stifle our duty to continue making advances in healthcare and improving the lives of patients.
The creature is not human because he doesn't have feeling and only animal and humans have feelings. According to the text it said, ‘Cursed creator! Why did you form a monster so hideous that even you turned from me in disgust?(Gris, chapter 7,6) Here is when even he admits that he is a monster and he is ugly and also Here is when the creature reads the journal and then gets upset because in the journal he writes how hideous the creature is and that he regrets making him. What the creature is trying to say is that why did he make him if you are going to run after. Also that why did he have to be so ugly and big.
In 1991, The United States established a policy to protect human beings from unfair, and unwanted subjects in experiments. This process was done by establishing an Informed Consent which is a legal document. Informed consent which is a legal document that is compose and overseen by the United States judicial system. This law was a necessity due, to the way humans were being tested on in the late 20’s. Unfortunately, in the past the United States took part in a lot of experiments on human beings as test subjects. Furthermore, the overall attributes of studies conducted during the 1920’s thru the 1950’s were considered unethical acts against human beings. Furthermore, the people that were involved had no knowledge that they were subjects in a life-threatening experiment. This type of treatment towards any human being is unethical medical practices. Experimenting on anyone without his or her knowledge is now considered unconstitutional in the United States of American. Anyone can volunteer however, there are guidelines which the volunteer may be either accepted or rejected for Clinal Trails
It is not ethical to harm any animal and one must not go against his or her morals. Scientists are often blinded by the negative effects against the animals. They are slit opened, poisoned, and tortured. Imagine being contained in an insufficient amount of area, chances are, you may often experience impaired brain development or anxious behaviors. Pre-experimentation conditions is not where it ends, animals experience harmful scenarios that occur in a laboratory. Often, animals are injected with conditions that a healthy animal may not be familiar with. Species of all kinds experience psychological reactions from drugs that are provided to them. Over the many, not just one, but many laboratories, monkeys are addicted to drugs, cats consist of holes drilled into their skulls, rats have their spinal cords crushed, and many indescribable conditions are forced into animals. It has been identified that an estimated 26 million animals are used every year in just only the U.S for research. Currently, the number of animals dead in experiments is unknown, as no attention is provided towards the issue. How heartless can the society
There is a thin line between going too far with scientific research and what is acceptable for the greater good. Most people don’t know where this line starts and stops which can lead to problems. This is presently shown in Mary Shelley's book Frankenstein as the main character, Victor Frankenstein, goes beyond this line almost to the levels of “god”. He wants to create life from death to help some of the world’s problems, such as disease. He goes to great extents to fulfil his dreams, but in his arrogance, he doesn’t see the repercussions that his research could have on himself and others.
It is always said that animals are used for experimentation because genetically they are closest to human beings but if they are this closely related, why are we abusing and torturing them? This is affected ignorance. In her article, “Affected Ignorance and Animal Suffering” Nancy Williams talks about different forms of affected ignorance. One form stood out more than others, “when people refuse to acknowledge the connection between their actions and the consequent suffering of their victims.” The experiments performed on animals are said to be beneficial to those animals, but studies have shown that animal testing could mislead researchers into ignoring cures and treatments. There are chemicals beneficial to human beings but harmful or ineffective to animals, such as aspirin (Akhtar). There are some medicines that have been tested on animals that provide benefits to these animals but when used in human testing, the results were less than great. For example, the drug thalidomide, which was a sleeping pill used in the 1950s, caused severe birth defects in ten thousand newborns. However, when the drug was tested on pregnant animals such as mice, rats, guinea pigs, cats, and hamsters there was no birth defects unless given at an extremely high dosage (Greek). The use of animals in experiments are unreliable when it comes to testing
Experimental procedures allow scientists to try products on animals before we get to use them. Scientists believe that it is justifiable to ignore their interests for the greater good. It is noticeable that certain animals have been protected from being used in experiments, such as chimpanzees. Scientists acknowledge that the life of a chimpanzee is more valuable than the life of a rat. Animals from other species are used in experiments to make sure that the final product does not harm a human. We would not like to use a product that may result in health complications. However, it is important to know that animal testing isn’t completely reliable. Different species react to stimuli differently. Rats’ bodies may have structures that help to deal with certain substances, while we may lack such advantage. Thus, we may not be making a difference using animals, because at the end the product it is made for the use of humans. Human testing would bring better results, but one could tell that most mentally healthy people would not like to borrow their bodies to be used for such procedures. Also, because rats do not have a say on their life, we get to live and they get to die. It may be morally acceptable to use a rat for such procedures, since their lives are meaningless, but using humans would be debatable and
Animal testing has been bad of the years and it can even be dated back to the ancient times of the greek. Physicians would dissect animals with the pure interest to obtain knowledge. But even then, one such physician stated that he would rather use a pig as his subject because he wanted to.The ethics of animal testing has always been questioned. Humans do not want to think of animals as on the same level of us. The similarity is terrifying and makes the cruelness obvious. In the 16 century it has been recorded that early vivisectionists, scientists who perform experiments and operations on live animals, did not consider animals to be of the same lineage of us and barely cared for them.The remaining are used as test dummies for products.
Every year, a total of one million children die from pneumonia. If you multiply that number by one hundred, you will have the number of animals that suffer painful deaths due to medical experimentation in U.S. laboratories each year. This number includes animals of all types, from mice and rats to fish and birds. These animals are typically used because of tradition rather than actual scientific reasoning, making their deaths all the more cruel. Animal experimentation is not only unethical, but ineffective and expensive. It should be phased out and replaced with technological alternatives.
In addition to the fact that animal experimentation is ineffective, unreliable, and costly, testing on animals also violates animal rights. Do we think that just because we are superior to animals that we have the right to subject these innocent creatures to cruel and painful experiments? The superiority humans feel over animals may be the reason why humans feel less troubled by inflicting pain on animals. Or perhaps humans justify this cruel act by saying that animals would not be used in experiments if their use was not absolutely necessary. The pain and misery these animals are put through is absolutely unjustified, especially since the experiments they are subject to are proven to be unnecessary and even pointless. As Ingrid Newkirk states, animals in the laboratories are "under constant stress from fear, the loss of control over their lives, and the denial of all
Modern science has dramatically evolved over the past years, there is a concern on whether or not people will try to play God with such developments and what damaging consequences could occur. Body modifications, cloning, Genetic engineering, and various fields in biotechnology are prime examples of fields that are attaining great advancements in a swift manner that increase concerns over the consequences. Progress in science induces people to question what it means to be a human and their own human nature, just as it causes people to question the effects that scientific progress may have on their good fortune, happiness or common welfare.The protagonist of Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, Victor Frankenstein is incited to advance the field of
Animal experimentation is cruel and needs to be banned. It is another form of animal abuse. The animals are locked in cold, tiny cages in laboratories waiting in fear of what might happen next. The animals are being treated cruelly and being injected with substances that the scientists do not know if it will harm the animals. “Right now, millions of mice, rats, rabbits, primates, cats, dogs and other animals are locked inside cold barren cages in laboratories across the country. They languish in pain, ache with loneliness, and long to roam free and use their minds. Instead, all they can do is sit and wait in fear of what the next terrifying and painful procedure that will be performed on them (PETA).
For starters, the experiments on animals are just plain cruel.And, most of the time unnecessary.
“In animal testing, countless animals are experimented on and then killed after their use. Others are injured and will still live the remainder of their lives in captivity.” (About animal testing)This means that they get tested and then they will be killed. Many people don’t want this to animals because animals should spend their life in a good way, not a bad way. “71,370 animals suffered pain during experiments while being given no anesthesia for relief” (aphis.usda.gov, 2017)
Human experimentation has been in practice for centuries and it was not until recently that it has been questioned. By definition human experimentation is when a researcher deliberately induces or alters a person's physical or mental functions. Human experimentation is preformed in ways that might prove therapeutic to the patient, but for which there is as yet insufficient evidence to make this reasonably certain. It can also be preformed in ways that will not be of any conceivable benefit to the particular patient, but which may advance scientific knowledge and human welfare. Although many wonderful medical discoveries have been made through human experimentation, it is also