Medicare Reauthorization Act Case Study

Clinical documentation Improvement (CDI) is the program or the training that is design to provide the good link between coders and health care providers that increase the accuracy and completeness of patient health care documentation. According to American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA) tool kit CDI is the program especially design for health care field for initiate concurrent and, as appropriate, retrospective review of patient health records for accurate, incomplete, or nonspecific provider documentation (Scharffenberger and Kuehn 2011). Most of the time patient health record review occur in inpatient location but it there is any confusion then the review can go through electronic health records too. CDI play a vital role solving complex case between coder and health care provider that result in easy and smooth operation of reimbursement process in health care organization for the service they provide to patient.

In 2012, the ACA found an excessive amount of readmissions of patients that were hospitalized within 30 days for the same medical conditions. This factor viewed under the ACA as a quality issue and CMS implemented value-based incentive payments based on performance in a set of quality measures. The plan is to implement a pay for performance (P4P) in formulas used by Medicare to reimbursement providers. “The objective is to link reimbursement to quality and efficiency as an incentive to improve the quality of health care, as well as reduce system-wide costs” (Shi and Singh, 2015). In addition to the P4P, nonprofit hospitals also focus on continual improvement, data and cost containment throughout the organization (Adamopoulos,

Now a statute, the physician/hospital pay for quality, not quantity, public law number: 114-10 signed April 16, 2015 also referenced as H.R.2 —1st Session of 114th Congress (2015-2016), sometimes called the “Permanent Doc Fix” 04/14/2015 : Passed Senate; 03/26/2015 : Passed House (Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015, 2015), which defines the payment and reimbursement reform to doctors treating patients with Medicare. This extensive reform includes the CHIP program insuring children and those families that don’t qualify for Medicare but are unable to afford private insurance and is funded by the federal government and individual states.

HIM Personnel play an important role in the Medicare system. Medicare has transitioned from “fee for service” to providing incentive payments for providers that issue high quality care at affordable prices. In order to achieve the “pay-for-quality” incentives hospitals and health care officials must improve their documentation processes. “If it isn’t documented, it wasn’t done” is more important than ever. It is the responsibility of the HIM professional to ensure the integrity of the patient chart. HIM professionals monitor the quality of documentation and ensure all clinical documentation is complete and accurate. HIM professionals are the key to identifying process problems while keeping in mind patient safety, quality of care, and revenue integrity. Medicare requires that hospitals report quality improvement measures in order to receive payments; HIM professionals can directly impact Medicare incentive payments. HIM professionals are directly involved with the Medicare Audit Improvement Act. The HIM professional collects health data that is subject to the audits; HIM professionals are the point of contact for responding to Medicare audit requests.

With enactment of the Medicare Modernization Act (MMA) in 2003, Medicare began moving toward value-based payments, and the introduction of Affordable Care Act (ACA) in 2010 meant that Medicare accelerated its use of value-based payments as a means of improving outcomes and managing overall costs (Wofford, 2015).

According to Chtourou (2013), a CDI program focuses on enhancing the accuracy of clinical documentation quality which requires a huge input from CDI specialists, heath information management professionals, coders and clinicians to collaborate together to review the quality of documentation reported/captured in order to ensure accuracy and complete of patient’s clinical encounter. As a healthcare provider, medical records that are incomplete or inaccurate often times, compromise the quality of care reporting and inevitably affect the clinical decision support system of the organization including the accuracy of reimbursement. This is reasonable since the CDI program has emerged as a new paradigm to meet the changing needs of maintaining a sound health record documentation across the healthcare industry (Hauger, 2014). Most of the CDI programs have to a great extent concentrated on boosting the Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRGs) installments by securing clinical documentation to support medical complications and co-morbidities (Hauger, 2014).

The value of CDI clinical documentation improvement (CDI) programs are important to any facility that recognizes the requirement of complete and accurate patient documentation. Documentation is very critical because it validates the care that was given. Furthermore, it shares important data to the caregiver and improve claims processing (Leventhal,2014). The three challenges are getting physicians to buy into the program, physicians are extremely busy so they are not connecting the dots on clinical documentation, and training the physicians to get them to understand they need to do better documenting (Leventhal,2014).

The first piece of legislation (one legislation I discussion 2 pieces of that) discuss is section 101 part of Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA), a bipartisan legislation signed into law on April 16, 2015. This law was created to replace the current law in that time Medicare reimbursement schedule with, the revolutionary idea of new program supposed directed focus on the quality, value and accountability of the national health care program. The CMS describe MACRA as a modern system new payment framework, supposed rewarded the national health care providers to obtain the better care instead of more service, looking for value over volume. The information’s observed in the interview provides consistent points

Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act is a bipartisan federal legislation signed on April 16, 2015 amended as title XVII of the social security act to reform the payment methods that Medicare pays to the physicians for the services rendered by creating Quality Payment Program (QPP) which repeals the Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR) formula for Medicare part B payments, reauthorization of the Children’s Health Insurance Program and implements a rewarding system to physicians for value of care rather than on the volume of services by combining the existing physician quality reporting programs under the Quality Payment Program. The main emphasis of MACRA under this Quality

The Medicare Modernization Act, or Medicare Prescription Drug Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003, was passed into law to amend and modernize the current Medicare system. There are a few problems that this law aims to solve or provide relief towards. First, it will allow seniors to save money on their prescription drugs because many have the problem of not being able to afford them on their own or have a lack of drug coverage with their existing plan. Low income seniors and those with limited resources will receive further assistance paying for medication. The second problem addressed by the MMA is that all seniors are receiving a standard Medicare and are not given choices of alternatives to better fit their needs. They will

Documentation records is related to the quality of patient care provided. It signifies the primary communication among multidisciplinary caregivers for efficient and effective intial treatment, for continuing care, and for the evidence that care and treatment occure. Regulatory agencies use the documentation as a means to measure the quality of services before granting accreditation or certification to healthcare organiztions. Some of those agencies include:

What could be implications for OT with reduction of inpatient utilization and shorter hospital stays?

Background In 2012, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) began to change the way hospitals were reimbursed for their services. This change would base reimbursement on the delivery of higher quality services. This new type of payment program meant hospitals would be rewarded for positive outcomes and be penalized for poor outcomes.

Medicare proposed revisions to payment policies in regards to the Physician Fee Schedule while focusing on primary care, chronic care management, mental health and diabetes. The recently proposed rule regarding physician fee schedules aims to improve payment, payment systems, and payment policies, as well as coordinates accountable care organizations’ quality measures with the current Medicare reimbursement rules, specifically, the Quality Payment Program and Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act, which rewards quality of care rather than the volume of care. CMS is updating payments to better reflect the changing healthcare community and value a service provides by increasing the amount of quality measures. Furthermore, in order to

The positive outcomes that have resulted due to value base programs have caused the model to gain traction and ignite one of the largest changes in history in the health care marketplace. By linking reimbursements to service quality, insurers such as the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services have facilitated a massive leap forward in the performance of United States health care providers. This achievement is a considerable accomplishment in the face of an institution that has received reimbursement from insurers via a fee-for-service model during the last 75 years. Soon, valued based payment models will represent the norm as more insurers support initiatives such as shared savings program, integrated clinical care, and accountable care payment models.