Color Blind or Color Brave? A speaker earns the right for his or her voice to be heard through the power of ethos, logos, and pathos. In the TED Talk “Color blind or color brave?” Mellody Hobson speaks about her experiences, states facts, and connects with the audience. Throughout her presentation, Hobson mainly addresses the events she has gone through as a woman of color. She informs the crowd about the difference of the terms color blind and color brave. She’s very open about the topic of race and believes it should be talked about, even if it is uncomfortable. Not speaking about race ignores continues issues that still happen today and can even create more problems. Mellody has the right to speak about the topic and capture the audience's attention because she gives her life experiences and factual information all while doing it in a non conflicting manner. Her open mindedness and passion are shown as she speaks.
Her strong suit is ethos, as she describes a moment when she was mistaken as kitchen help, the words her mother told her as a child, and other events that have affected her life. Ethos is one's personal experiences, experiences that are reliable. She describes what her life has been like as a black business woman. Her stories are credible because in a way they are relatable. Most people listening to her stories might have had similar experiences as Mellody. People of color know what Mellody means when her mother asks about how she is treated as a young girl.
Ethos she possess a positive character that is used to influence the public that she actually uses proactive and you see how beautiful she is on her photo.
Another example of her usage of ethos is within her demonstrations of the emotions she felt towards these stereotypes, so the audience can understand what she’s going through. She greatly addresses this when referring to her childhood and family dynamics. She
Ethos is the credibility, moral character, and experience of the speaker. In Mary Fisher’s speech she uses ethos to show her involvement and passion for AIDS. Mary Fisher was infected with the AIDS virus and her son contracted the virus at birth. In telling the viewers this she illustrated why she is so passionate about the cause. Another way she builds ethos is through her moral character. She does this by telling the audience she is concerned with the future of all
Ethos: Adichie’s ethos (credibility) is a well-known attention grabber as she maintains the focus of her audience by telling her growing up in Nigeria stories. She continues throughout her speech to share her personal experiences, and using humor to inspire people to have similar thoughts and ideas. This demonstrates her knowledge on the subject as she goes on sharing her personal like struggles.
According to How Writing Works the definition of the term “ethos” is, “the credibility of the writer.” Ethos can work in two ways, you can possess it, or you can earn it. Nansook Park earned her PhD in psychology and is a psychology professor at the University of Michigan, so her work it’s a given that she has experience in the field. From reading the whole excerpt it seems as though the target audience is the everyday American citizen. Park’s tone is more relaxed and sympathetic, which makes her and her arguments more relatable.
Furthermore, Christina Judith Hein, in Color-Blindness vs. Race Matters claims that a common goal cannot be that every individual is treated the same, regardless of their race, gender, or age, but rather, these differences require different responses within the social framework with certain norms and values. Reactions to an individual must be specific to that individual’s needs.
According to Alan G. Gross and Arthur E. Walzer, ethos is a type of ethical appeal establishing the speaker’s credibility or character and expertise as persuasive techniques (…). Throughout, Evicted Matthew Desmond employs ethos to gain and reinforce his knowledge and expertise on the subject, to prove his reliability as a
Ethos is a rhetorical appeal that Eighner establishes automatically and through the text as well. Eighner is a well known writer, his work has appeared in the Washington Post, The New York Times Review, and many others. He was a graduate of the University of Texas at Austin, his educated mind is displayed through his diction. He uses the word like corrupted, obscure, frankness, and niche. Obviously these are words your average “street rat” would not use. This deems Eighner credibility because he is an educated personnel. Eighner’s
Most of the discussion dealt with historical overview on slavery and how it pertained to today’s society. The audience was reminded early on in the discussion that race does exist in its consequences and that we must not overlook those consequences. The speaker at this portion of the discussion was a woman who seemed extremely fond of her topic. Her gestures and speech inflections were much exaggerated to the point where it almost drew attention away from her topic. It was just ironic to me how a Caucasian woman could speak with such “emotion” when she was never herself enslaved!
I began by speaking about transforming social arrangements by using education and communication to change to an inclusive view. I took a close look at a program my father and I participated in, The Indian Guides. I feel my father did not understand the racist underpinning of the program and its symbols. I did come to realize how detrimental color-blindness can be as it ignores racism. Later I explored the painful story of 3 individuals that suffered heart attacks. The success or failure of their recovery was linked to their class position. The ability to obtain health care in this country should never depend on class or socioeconomic strata. Care and wellness education should be available to all. Toward the end of the term I faced the power of words and images. These symbols can have a tremendous impact on the division of race, gender and class in society. Today I can choose to be part of those striving for an equitable society or part of the color blind
ethos is used to persuade the reader that the character has an ethical appeal. On chunk 2 “My
He knows what the people he is fighting for feels and what they have to face. He can speak from personal experience. “[...] when you are humiliated day in and day out by nagging signs reading "white" and "colored"; when your first name becomes "nigger," your middle name becomes "boy" [...]” (King 3). He gives these examples of how he and others are treated to show that his argument is coming from somewhere, from cause. He uses ethos in order to make his argument credible to his audience, because of this, the audience now knows that he has real life experiences supporting his argument. His claims are not made up but come from a real source.
Ethos is the ethical appeal that convinces the audience of the writer's credibility and/or character. Ethos is used to convince an audience that the author is worth listening to because they are credible. The language has to be appropriate and suit the audience and topic. The author must sound unbiased and present their expertise all while using proper syntax and grammar. Wallace displays Ethos in his speech by portraying himself as a confident and genuine person. For instance, Wallace tells his listeners, “if you’re worried that I plan to present myself here as the wise, older fish explaining what water is to you younger fish, please don’t be”(Wallace). By doing so, Wallace is displaying a sense of humility that comforts his audience, they now know he is a trustful person not pretending to be someone he is not. He also sounds very confident in what he will explain, he isn’t there to say meaningless things, rather something significant to them. Calling his audience younger fish shows that his targeted audience is indeed young college graduates. Throughout his speech Wallace assures his listeners that he is not there to lecture them on unnecessary topics. This also gives him more credibility because it shows his audience he considered their concerns and made an effort to avoid them. Wallace’s audience can now become more appreciative towards him and view him as a credible, competent
In the Ted Talk called Color Blind Or Color Brave, the speaker Mellody Aboso speaks about race. She talks about if people are not color blind, but instead color brave in society and businesses it will be stronger and better. First, the speaker Melody Aboso defines color blindness as a behavior that pretends that someone doesn't notices race. She believes that if you don't deal with the discomfort of different races, than it’s going to effect the next generation of people by recognizing or discriminate different races, genders, etcetera. Next, she speaks about being color brave. She also defines color brave as being willing to have proactive conversations about race in a honest manner. Mellody Aboso also speaks about that by being color brave
2. Ethos is one of the three appeals. It is based on the character or credibility of the speaker and or writer. It’s all about making the audience trust and believe in you in a sense. You want them to feel connected to you, that they have your trust and understanding.