Memo Legal Situation

The facts of the case are as follows: Douglas Castro had access to clients with a combined net

Parties and their roles: In this case there was Dorris Reed (plaintiff) and Robert King as the (defendant).

be described. Jurisdictional requirements for this case as well as the reasons why it was heard at

(c) Notwithstanding Subsection (b), an owner, lessee, or occupant of land may be liable for injury to a child caused by a highly dangerous artificial condition on the land if:

* Summons - Notification by the court in which the complaint is filed as an action being brought against the defense. Service of the summons typically requires a response from the defense within a 30-day period. No response from the defense can trigger a default judgment for the plaintiff.

Defendant: the person being sued or accused by plaintiff in the court of law (Clarkson, Miller, Frank, Cross chapter 1). Reckitt & Colman, Inc. will be referred to in this analysis as “R&C” from here on forward.

7. Court’s Order: As a result of this holding the court has established sufficient law entitles P to have her case heard before trial court.

On or about June 25, 2016, the Plaintiff’s automobile, a 2006 Lincoln LS, was stolen from her and burned to the point where the property damage to the automobile was determined to be a total loss. At the time, the Plaintiff was covered by an automobile insurance police with the

In West Corp. v. Superior Court, 116 Cal. App. 4th 1167 (Cal. App. 4th Dist. 2004), a California resident, Patricia Sanford, filed a class action complaint against West Corporation and WTC (a subsidiary of West Corp.), telemarketing firms organized in Delaware and headquartered in Nebraska, alleging causes of action for: (1) violation of the consumers legal remedies act; (2) unlawful, fraudulent, and unfair business practices; (3) untrue and/or dishonest advertising; (4) conversion; (5) unjust enrichment; (6) fraud and deceit; and (7) negligent misrepresentation. Essentially, one of West’s telemarketers had misrepresented a product during a sales pitch in which the caller (Sanford) had purchased the product over the phone. West claims that the California court could not assert personal jurisdiction over them because they did not maintain any offices or employees in California, was not licensed to do business in California, nor did they own any property located in California. Moreover, West motioned the court to quash the service of summons; however, the court denied the request and ruled that the court was authorized to assert personal jurisdiction over their corporation.

All people given a traffic citation are to appear in court on a specific date after their traffic citations. Those people who plead not guilty are set for trial at a future date, and the prosecutor and arresting officer are required to appear at trial. 75 percent of people who plead not guilty fail to appear at trial, but the city is still responsible for paying overtime expenses to those officers who are not on duty but must appear at trial. The court administrator is called upon to devise a system to limit the city's overtime expenses. The court administrator devises a system where the court has access to police officer schedules, and where all officers are normally scheduled at least one day a month during court trial hours, and sets trials involving those officers during that time period.

Jurisdiction is proper in the Circuit Court of Osceola County, Florida, because, at all relevant times and as described further herein, (1) Physician operated, conducted, engaged in, and carried on a business or business venture (specifically, the private practice of medicine) in Osceola County, Florida, (2) Physician had an office in Osceola County, Florida from which to conduct the private practice of medicine, and (3) Physician breached a contract with the Hospital relating to his practice of medicine in this state by failing to perform acts required by the contract to have been performed in Osceola County, Florida. §48.193, Florida Statutes.

Al’s jury demand is not timely. A jury demand is timely if a written demand is served on the other parties no later than 14 days after service of the last pleading directed at the issue.

When the court issues an arrest warrant because the defendant failed to appear before the court, the defendant can ask for their bail bond reinstated, if the communicates early with the court.

In order to be able to appeal, we have to find out if there was a legal error that occurred in the trial court, and that such an error was material, thus, it would have changed the outcome of the trial.

The individual never knows exactly what day the officer will come on so they will try and engage in as much community service hours as soon as the next cycle begins to make sure they can receive the 30-minute extension to their probation curfew. The stimulus in this example is that the individual wants to have a longer probation curfew to have time to visit friends and family, the behavior is to do at least 50 hours of community service as quickly as possible, and the consequence is that the