preview

Mental Health Care Issues

Better Essays

Over the last two centuries, mental health care for individuals with mental illness has significantly progressed. Despite this, today many issues remain and resurfacing as a byproduct of these shifting mental health policies. For continued effective policy change regarding mental illness, it is imperative to conduct policy and historical analysis to establish the precedence of key issues. Thereby, it is also equally as essential to understand the implications individuals with mental illness faced throughout history navigating the mental health system of our past. As such, historical court cases and policy changes, as well as, the experiences of the individuals are relevant to how we proceed onward today in mental health policy changes, treatment …show more content…

In addition, the findings impacted the cultural and political shift from institution to the community, standards for institutions and treatment methods and diagnosis. Lessard v. Schmidt (1972) (see Appendix A for detailed case brief on this court case) would have made a profound difference in Mrs. Ethel outcome. This court case found that Wiscosin’s standard for the use of involuntary commitment was minimal and not utilized appropriately. Subsequently the standards across the United States changed and involuntary commitment became an option when danger to themselves or others was present. Mrs. Ethel, not diagnosed with a mental illness nor was she regarded as a danger to herself or others and involuntary commitment would have been an irrational procedure as a solution to the presenting issue of her refusal to vacate. The determination by her physician that “rest” was an appropriate treatment would again not have been justification for institutionalization. If the courts found justification for an involuntary commitment hearing, she now would have the right to due process, which allows counsel who would provide adequate explanation of the proceeding and outcomes, allowing for a more appropriate informed decision. However, it is critical to see all aspects, although profound definition of the use of involuntary commitment it also removed from the courts use of parens patriae as a decisional obligation and responsibility of care now would be on the individual and the family. It was determined that Mrs. Ethel family was not capable to caring for her and in a depression, finances could potentially deplete, and then who is now responsible for her care. Would my suitcase owner be amongst the many homeless who have fallen on hard times and the accompanied additional emotional distress in combination with her

Get Access