Mental Health Claimant Case

Through this essay it has become evident that’s mental health nurses need to have a full understanding of the mental health act 2007 and the changes it has bought to this area of care. They need to be aware of how necessary it is for the recovery of consumers that they themselves and their family and carers be involved in their mental treatment. Recovery-oriented services need to be assessed by the nurse and the consumer to ensure an individualised and personal recovery journey. Nurses will need to tailer their care to each consumer as each individual has different and experience and supports. Nurses need to remain unbiased in their care delivery and not be influenced by the stigma that surrounds mental illness. They need to work in partnership

“Everyone has an important role to play in achieving healthcare rights and contributing to safe, high quality care. Genuine partnerships between those families and carers of people receiving care and those providing it lead to the best possible outcomes.” (Western NSW Local Health District 2012).

Mental health courts are a resource given to prisoners who would normally be put in prison if they had not decided to join this special program. Mental health court is a court run program by the district attorney’s office in some counties. This program is based off of traditional court room structure but is also paired with community services. Mental health courts solve a lot of different problems within our criminal justice system. The first problem it solves is the

During the fall 2014 and spring 2015 semesters, I worked for the Eighth Judicial District Court Specialty Court. Specifically, I worked for Drug Court and sometimes with the Mental Health Court. I worked there as a social work intern. Working there is what inspired me to take mental health law. I wanted to see, if any, the interrelationships between mental health law and specialty court.

The Mental Capacity Act 2005 (Legislation.gov.uk, 2016(B)) introduced Independent Mental Capacity Advocates (IMCAs). An independent mental capacity advocate supports individuals who are unable to settle on or comprehend choices by expressing their perspectives and wishes or securing their rights. This is a statutory advocate service, which implies in specific circumstances individuals who lack the capacity must be forwarded on to an advocate.

T.R. is a 69 year old, Caucasian female with a history of schizophrenia who presented to University Hospital Medical Center Emergency Room under Baker Act for recent suicidal attempt. According to the Baker Act report, she ran out of her retirement facility, trying to be hit by vehicles. She suffered a slight injury to her right ankle, as the slightly slightly hit her in an effort to abruptly stop the vehicle. She verbalized to police officers she wanted to die. She reported that peers in her retirement community learned about her history and had been gossiping about her. She reported increased paranoia due to this. She was hospitalized in the same psychiatric unit two months ago, after she was diagnosed with depression. Patient states the reason she was diagnosed with depression is because her two sons are not willing to talk to her. She states that she is separated and living without her family in an Assisted Living Facility. As per patient and chart review, the patient was born and raised in New Jersey and moved to South Florida. The patient currently lives in a retirement home and had to move several times to the different Assisted Living Facility, due to her paranoia and delusional behavior. She is currently retired and reports that she used to work from home as a home health aide. She has two sons and tries to maintain a good relationship with them, but denies any contact with them. She reports the biggest stressor is basically a relationship with her

Plans additionally commonly set lower dollar maximums every year and per lifetime on psychological health benefits. More ever, mental health outpatient insurance generally included a 50 percent coinsurance rate contrasted and 20 percent for other medicinal conditions.

Kimmy is presenting for “anger outbursts”, homicidal threats, and behavioral problems. The client reports these behaviors began eight months ago after the death of her mother. Her mother died in an auto accident, for which the children were not present. Kimmy has been hospitalized three times in the past 8 months for anger outburst towards her Uncle, older brother, and peers. She has made homicidal threats towards her older brother. Prior to her most

Next, Cunningham was diagnosed with "paranoid schizophrenia," "antisocial personality disorder", and "borderline intellectual function". Second, Shaifer "long ago diagnosed with bipolar disorder. Third, Pinson with a history of "epilepsy, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia". Fourth, Narducci Jr who was diagnosed with a "mood disorder" and a "mixed personality disorder.

Claimant reports history of multiple medical complaints. Since the age of 60 she reports struggling with urinary incontinence, which impacts her functioning at work. She reports feeling ashamed and guilty that she is unable to control her urination and has the need to periodically utilize the restroom or go to her car taking time away from her responsibilities. In the past few years claimant has severe intensification of physical symptoms, including back pain, right shoulder and hand weakness, blood pressure, headaches, sleep difficulty, and depression-related fluctuating appetite, fatigue and sluggishness. She reports experiencing heart palpitations present (racing heart), dizziness, and fear of actual fainting, a feeling of choking and not being able to breathe, chest pains, nausea or intestinal pains, shortness of breath, tremors in the hands, hot flashes and tunnel vision. The claimant reports that she sleeps very minimally; averaging 3-4 hours of sleep per night on an interrupted basis due to physical and emotional pain. She reports that she has very poor mobility due to pain and depression-related poor motivation.

She was hospitalized multiple times in psychiatric facilities (2001-2002) for suicidal ideations and attempt, severe depression and anxiety, and hallucinations for self-harm. She was under “aggressive psychiatric and psychological treatment” (2004-2012) without improvement. She had a below average intellectual functioning and was unable of managing money.

Mental health is as important, if not more so, as is physical/surgical health. People with mental health issues can have prolonged illnesses because they can't be cured, only treated, and often that treatment is expensive. NAMI, National Association of Mental Health lobbied, successfully, in 2014 to prevent changes to Part D. Theses changes would have given restricted access to medications for antidepression and antipsychotic. They are now supporting a bill, Medicare Formulary Improvement Act, which benefits the protected class of status mental health medications. I believe that all insurances should cover mental health treatment for bipolar, psychotic, and other mental issues. It is hard for people who have low incomes to pay extravagant amounts

Just last year 1 in 5 Americans suffered from mental illness. Everyday Americans and people in other countries are suffering because of mental illness and they should be treated to matter the cost. Mental health has just as much effect on the body as does physical health. Which that comes to my essential question. Should health care companies cover mental health treatment? One side says yes because that would help millions of people with getting treatment because the cost is too extensive for them. But on one side of the claim some people say that the cost is too severe to cover everyone’s mental health treatment through insurance. Nevertheless, It is extremely essential that no matter the cost that people are being treated for their mental illnesses. Many people are suffering from unfair treatment from insurance companies with mental health issues to prove that I will talk about that people really do suffer, that mental health patients really do want help and lastly that it is legally deemed to be treated the same insurance wise.

This particular trial focused on the challenge of helping individual that have mental illness problems. Because court staff doesn't really have the education to dialogues individuals, the court can only use previous records to determine what is best for the individual. This trial was difficult because the individual was a young boy, who parents tried ever treatment program for their son. In this case, the young boy felt that he didn’t need any help and the medical he was taking was working, dispute his arrest record showing several breaks in entering and weapon charges. The challenge was that the young boy never stayed in a program no longer than 2 weeks because he voluntarily entered. The parent felt the need for the court to mandate their son in order to get properly diagnosed.

The key fact in this case is that OSHA is at their facility and Jay legally does not know if he should allow OSHA to conduct their search. The situation is that OSHA wants to assure that Jay’s mentally ill facility was in compliance. Blood-borne pathogen policy and Hepatitis vaccination procedure are common policy for hospitals and clinics. Jay and Leigh do not believe their employees are in any serious danger and do not have a policy in place. “If there is any possibility an employee may be exposed to BBP’s during the course of their work, the principal investigator or supervisor must implement a written Exposure Control Plan” (UC San Diego/NA, 2017). The market surrounding the mentally ill had changed and Jay saw an opportunity to provide