preview

Mental Illness Szasz Summary

Decent Essays
Open Document

Szasz makes it very clear in his opening sentence that he is against the notion of “Mental Illness”. He is not necessarily arguing the fact people have issues with their personal being, but he is refuting the term “Mental Illness” as the probable cause. He believes that the term mental illness is no longer the appropriate term that everyone believed it once was, it is simply a common scapegoat. He then further explains how the issue of having mental illness refers to having illness of the mind when in fact it is no other than illness of the brain. Szasz makes a note that when talking about mental illness it is usually parallel to other diseases of the body except it involves plaguing of the brain. Just like any other disease which is a defect of that specific body part, disease of the brain is a neurological defect, not an issue of living. There is another valid point people overlook as well. Saying that mental illness is the same as any other bodily illness or disease would mean that it could be inside the individual, able to be transmitted to others and could even be cured. He proves this to be inaccurate in …show more content…

Diagnosis is also manipulated by the observer and patient relationship or arrangement. Szasz acknowledges that hiring a psychiatrist for one’s self may influence how they diagnose and treat you. This point is so true. How can someone determine your mental illness and prescribe you such treatments when the diagnosis was nonmedical? This further backs up his claim that it is not as similar to other diseases as it is made out to be. Any other disease requires some sort of medical diagnosis. No tests were run so how can their diagnosis be accurate? There can very well be someone else to diagnosis the symptoms as something different depending on their beliefs. The practice should be objective and not subjective or

Get Access