Mental Instability Essay

Imagine waking up in the middle of the night to a complete stranger who is in your house, threatening to harm you, and your family, and you cannot do anything about it. Imagine, not being able to go target shooting or hunting, because there are laws passed to prevent you from owning a firearm. The truth is, more and more people in this country are trying to restrict law-abiding people from owning firearms due to the overwhelming rise in gun related crimes. As law abiding citizens, the constitution gives us the right to bear arms. Whether it is for recreation or protection,

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” (The Second Amendment). Ever since 1791, Americans have had the right to bare arms. Recently people have begun debating whether or not these rights should still apply and lawmakers have even been slowly taking them away. Our founding fathers were clear when they stated that these rights shall not be infringed.

Gun laws are established for making a nation safer by limiting population’s access to guns. The

"A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." (The Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution). As Americans we are afforded certain rights that are upheld by the United States constitution, and many citizens believe these rights to be part of our nation’s heritage, or the “birthright” as Americans. Conversely there are those which are opposed to some of these “birthrights” which were added to the nation’s constitution almost two hundred and thirty years ago. Although gun control is a major topic concerning Americans and their rights, it is not always on the forefront of the many issues in today’s world. It is only when there is a

One of the famous founding fathers Samuel Adams stated: “And that the said Constitution be never construed to authorize Congress ... to prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms....” Firearms are the core of this nation’s building blocks; in the second amendment which states: “[a] well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.” Owning a firearm, a guaranteed freedom of every law-abiding citizen and taking away or restricting the rights of a citizen makes the United States a less free

The United States Constitution’s Bill of Rights states that the Second Amendment which is the right to bear arms which is allowing us to have weapons in our hands; many individuals are becomingly increasingly unsure of where the line is drawn on being able to have a gun and what prevents people from using them for harm. Some people have argued that even though the Second Amendment does protect our individual rights to have the option to own arms, that it should give the government authority to ban high-crime communities from using handguns. Gun violence embraces every town in the United States.

In America, we face a unique predicament. This predicament is different from those of other countries, because the rest of the world does not face this problem at such a large scale. Indeed, the United States citizen is often stereotyped around the world as an overweight, southern white male who loves hamburgers and guns. This is a very negative stereotype and shows how the other countries view the United States’ gun issues. Guns are so accessible to the public that many people own large numbers of them, along with ammunition, without a logical reason. Debates about gun violence often focus on the number of guns that are in circulation. However, the number of guns, while part of the problem, is not the only source of America’s gun epidemic. To combat gun violence, the United States needs to reduce the number of guns manufactured, require gun safety classes, and ensure mental stability for gun owners.

When trained responsibly and people have respect for the gun, handguns become the most effective means of self-defense, where a handgun ban takes this means of protection and throws in out the window. John Stossel (Human Events), a paper columnist, a journalist, and reporter for Fox News Channel, explains that “laws against guns are really laws against self-defense, and mandatory gun-free zones are in actuality free crime zones.”Handgun bans will not stop criminals from acquiring guns; they will, however, prevent a law abiding citizen from buying a gun for self-defense.” While his thoughts could be extreme when saying that laws for gun control are preventing self-defense, he makes a person think. These laws that ban handguns are leaving the people of the nation with less means of self defense. Ripping away a persons means of self defense, creates vulnerability, creating serious problems and possibly more crime. Stossel (2008) is correct gun bans that are averting law enduring citizens from guns to use as a self-defense mechanism, giving the nations criminal’s a advantage before the situation is even happening. Law abiding folks won’t willingly break laws, especially when it comes to owning handguns if they are banned, however laws don’t stop criminals. When criminals want to break a law or hurt someone that person isn’t

For many years, the government has been left undecided about the controversies of gun control with the lingering fact that tighter gun restrictions could threaten the rights of United States citizens. About 52% of Americans are against stricter gun laws since taking action will not help criminal record(Mendoza). Others choose to believe that guns are the reason for violence, meanwhile, abolishing rights will not positively influence this issue because of the Second Amendment and availability of guns. A majority of the attempts to restrict firearm use have been unsuccessful, such as the Brady Act and Federal Gun Control Act. The government has not realized that guns remain a right as a part of the Second Amendment and play an immense role in

They assume that People without guns are murdered daily by criminals who have guns. So, having a gun makes you better able to defend your family. Also, 75-80% of police officers who get called to a crime scene arrive 10-15 min after the crime was committed. Consequently, criminals have enough time to escape. So, it is necessary for all citizens to be able to defend themselves against criminals.

Gun control is a major part of American Politics. One problem in the gun control discussion is if the people should have the right to “Conceal-and-carry” weapons with them all the time.The Founding Fathers saw owning a gun  as a means to protect against tyrannical rule. America’s foundation was built with firearms. Ever since America’s freedom from Britain, American’s have been enthralled with firearms. A part of our Constitution is devoted directly to our gun rights, the Second Amendment.

Moving on murders will still happen without guns. Maine an encyclopedia states that guns are used 45% of the time in all crimes. This means that over half the time other weapons are used. To continue Guns are only used 10% of the time in murders. Therefore gun's barely contribute. To sum it up guns don't cause murders people do.

Having laws to prevent guns to be bought will not prevent anything from happening. It will mainly affect two types of people: law abiding citizens who account their protection from firearms and people who want to use guns for iniquitous reasons. However, the criminals will attain firearms regardless of the law; similar to many other illegal things in the U.S. Some illicit substances that are prohibited in every state in the U.S are methamphetamine, cocaine, heroin, and oxycodone. Yet, these drugs are still available and accessed effortlessly for people in prolific amounts. The simple acts of banning or calling for additional gun-control laws accomplish nothing but make citizens defenseless.

Most countries in the world allow civilians to purchase firearms subject to certain restrictions. Under second amendment united states also give permit to every civilian that they can keep and bear arms for their self defense. The intention behind second amendment was self defense but in past couple of year it works totally opposite than intention. One report indicate that more number of people killed in mass shooting than number of people killed in terrorist attack. These numbers are enough to warning us that how all of us are moving toward big threat. However many people think that ban on firearm is not permanent solution for decrease crime rate. Criminals who doesn’t care about laws and rules regulation can easily get gun illegally and at that time person who don’t have gun be a easy target for them.

We were unable to detect any reduction to date in two types of gun murders that are thought to be closely associated with assault weapons, those with multiple victims in a single incident and those producing multiple bullet wounds per victim. At best, the assault weapons ban can have only a limited effect on total gun murders, because the banned weapons and magazines were never involved in more than a modest fraction of all gun murders.