Essay on Merchant of Venice

In ‘The Merchant of Venice’ Shylock is very strong minded and is singled out of the play because he is a mean Jew that charges interest. Shylock is very stubborn and determined to keep to his bond; a pound of flesh of Antonio.

One of the strengths of good theater is its ability to mirror the problems and conditions shaping its time. In The Merchant of Venice, William Shakespeare reflects two important aspects of Elizabethan society: the corrupting influence of prosperity and the increasingly vengeful nature of Venetian justice. To address the former issue, Shakespeare downplays the importance of wealth by associating its involvement in romance with superficial and insubstantial advantages. He characterizes prosperity as a deceiving agent, citing its ability to introduce shallowness into a relationship. Shakespeare reasons that genuine romance depends on sacrifice and emotion, not wealth. The problem with justice is equally striking. In the play, justice is

Shylock on the other hand is not put on the same pedestal as Antonio. As the Jewish representation of Venice, Shylock, “as a usurer, refuses to lend money interest-free in the name of friendship.” (Bevington, pg. 76) This act of usury in the eyes of Christianity is considered sinful, immoral and inhumane. Instead of lending money interest-free he applies collateral and conditions to the bond. Also, Christians of the time looked at Jews with negativity. “It can be argued that this goes back to the earliest days of Christianity, when the tradition began of making the Jews bear the guilt of the Crucifixion. Throughout medieval and early Renaissance Europe the prejudice bred dark fantasies: Jews were accused, for

“There is no doubt that Shylock is a cunning and vengeful man, but nothing can justify the treatment he receives at the hands of the Christians.”

Shakespeare’s The Merchant of Venice is so alike to our financially afflicted world. The rules of law and commerce are subject to deceptive manipulation, fear of "the other" overwhelms respect for a common humanity, duplicity is the norm, sexuality is a vehicle for ambition, and money drives and wraps almost every action. It is a classic tale that includes important details of the financial crisis in the United States during 2007-2009. Shakespeare’s Venice, like the New York of his time - and the financial capitals of ours - is a city based on borrowing, on market speculation and greed masquerading as wealth and sophistication. Behind the curtains of the practice of lending and borrowing money in Shakespeare’s play lay the transition to capitalism: the rise of banking system; the scarcity for credit in developing industrial enterprises; and the growing dispute of default facing both aristocratic landlords and, above all, small, independent early entrepreneurs on trading ventures. Even though almost 600 years apart from each other, both Shakespeare’s tale and the financial crisis in the United States during 2007-2009 have a similar financial dilemma, each has its unique Shylock, Bassanio and Antonio- people who were responsible for causing the meltdown of their days.

Shakespeare reflects the wider tensions of his own context regarding the conflict between filial duty and Christian morality in the execution of vengeance to shape the responder’s perception of the fraudulence required to commit murder. Shakespeare develops the conventions of the revenge tragedy to reflect his society’s changing code of honor, from the medieval duty of revenge to a value of individual conscience revived by the Protestant Reformation. The question of Christian morality reveals itself in Claudius’ prayer as he shows genuine remorse for his act of murder: ‘It hath the primal eldest course upon’t/ A brother’s murder.’ This allusion to Caine and Abel emphasises the sin of killing one’s ‘kin’, encouraging the audience to question Hamlet’s justification for vengeance as a filial duty to his father and the state, (what he believed) to restore stability to his own context. Hamlet’s driving sense of filial duty is reinforced, as he believes ‘the villain kills my father, and for that/I his sole son do this same villain send/to heaven’. The parallel of ‘son’ and ‘father’ conveys this, while the repetition of ‘villain’ is an unconscious attempt to justify his intent. However, Hamlet’s dilemma between filial love and Christian

Pay him six thousand, and deface the bond (3.2.298) This section is an instance were the word bond as the agreement between Shylock is confronted by another strong character in this play. Portia playing a strong masculine role for her house hold and new husband Bassanio. She shows her power and authority by wanting to deface the bond and pay more than the original sum, to free Antonio and help out Bassanio. This shows that even though the agreement between Antonio and

Another example of Portia fighting back is when Portia uses trickery to make Shylock stick exactly to the bond causing him to be condemned to Christianity and to give half of his belongings to Antonio and the other half to

Throughout the play Shylock is presented in different ways: a victim who lives in a prejudice and intolerant society, a villain who deserves scorn and rejection and a tragic figure who has admiral traits worthy of respect but destroys himself by giving in to his flaws and weaknesses. This

He declares, "I'm very glad of it. I'll plague him, I'll torture him, I am glad of it." (3, 1, 115-116) At the end of Act 3, scene 1, Shylock's true motive is revealed. Shylock says, "I will have the heart of him if he forfeit, for were he out of Venice I can make what merchandise I will." (3, 1, 125-127) All these comments clearly attempt to paint Shylock as a money-worshipping murderer and not as a person.

O my daughter! Fled with a Christian! O my Christian ducats! My ducats and my daughter!’ (II, iix, 15-17). He would ‘rather his daughter dead, and the jewels in her ear!’ (III, I, 81-82). Even though Shylock and Jessica’s relationship is filled with minor affection. Portia’s love for her father is visible and true.

Shakespeare criticizes society’s output on Judaism through his play with the characters Shylock and Jessica. Shylock and Jessica are seen as outsiders in Venice and are discriminated by the Christian characters in the play for being Jewish. For instance, Gratiano describes Jessica, a former Jew, as an "infidel "(III.ii.223) despite converting and marrying a Christian. By calling Jessica an “infidel”, Gratiano is implying that she isn’t a true Christian and is still a Jew. Later in the play, Jessica is also told there’s "no mercy in heaven.."(III.v.31) because she was Jewish. This statement evokes the idea all Jews are sinful and can’t enter heaven. The two examples above show how Jews are seen as inferior to Christians in the play. Because of this bigotry, Shylock is vengeful toward Antonio with his bond. When he finds out about Antonio’s lost ships, he exclaims: I'll plague him, I'll torture him. I am glad of it." (III.i.115-116). This line demonstrates the stereotypical image of Jews that Christians see. What Shylock says relates to the 16th century where Christians often believed that Jews used their blood in religious ceremonies. By saying he’ll “torture” and “plague” Antonio, Shylock is conforming with the negative image society has of him. However, Shakespeare also paints Shylock as a human character treated unfairly by the Christians in Venice. After finding out that his daughter Jessica eloped to a Christian man, Shylock delivers a powerful speech about Jews being equals: “Hath not a Jew hands, organs, dimensions, senses, affections, passions? Fed with the same food, hurt with the same weapons, subject to the same diseases [...]as a Christian is?” (III.i.48-54). This speech presents to the audience that Shylock is human

Shylock finds joy when roles are reversed, causing people to beg for his mercy. Throughout the play, Christian characters were racist to him, they were constantly disrespecting him due to his Jewish background. However, in Act III Scene III, roles are reversed when their racist antics turn into mercy. The characters want to save Antonio from being harmed, and so they beg Shylock to change his mind:

Shylock is also the victim when Jessica leaves. He loses his only child, that underneath his cold exterior it becomes apparent he loves her and struggles with the depth of his grief. He loses hold on his business and walks through the streets morning the loss of his child to the men he detests. He cries in anguish ‘The curse never fell upon our nation till now; I never felt it till now…. My own flesh and blood to rebel! I say, my daughter is my flesh and blood.’ This scene evokes compassion towards Shylock but he is tormented more by Salario and Salanio. This shows him as a repentant father, a man a victim to his child’s will and prejudice surrounding his race.

Disguised as young lawyer Balthazar, who speaks with heightened eloquence to beg Shylock to show mercy. Portia’s speech about the quality of mercy is wasted to Shylock. It's almost as if Shylock got his way, revenge. After all these years it is time for him to complete his deed. His deed to eliminate Antonio. As his moment arrives it is all dismantled by the intelligence of Portia. Portia turns Shylock’s greatest weapon-the law-against him, Portia delivers once last chance of mercy to Shylock. Shylock is warned if even a drop of blood is spilled he will be accused of conspiring a life against another Venetian citizen all of his land and goods will be confiscated by the state. Shylock agrees to take thrice the sum. Shylock drops the case, but Portia deems him guilty for threatening another Venetian citizen. Half his property and land shall go to Antonio and the other half to the state. “I pardon thee thy life before thou ask it.” The Duke of Venice demonstrates mercy even after what the Jew had committed. The court could have acted on revenge against Shylock but they knew mercy was far greater than revenge. Shakespeare urges mercy is preferable than revenge. He tells us that even those who have wronged deserve mercy. Acting towards revenge will not prosper but mercy can be replenishing. Shakespeare shows us one can show mercy and that it is not forced.