Mercutio Is To Blame In Shakespeare's Romeo And Juliet

Even though he was defending Romeos honour, he should have not fought in the streets then he wouldn’t be dead and then Romeo would have not gone after Tybalt and slain him. For Mercutio he was innocent but he still had rage over Tybalt that he couldn’t have let go off: “Good king of cats nothing but one of your nine lives” (Act3, Scene 1, Line 45). He should have left Tybalt alone instead he drew out his sword, after Tybalt drew his to Romeo. Since Mercutio was the princes’ cousin he could have told the Prince and could have got Tybalt banished or worse executed. Another mistake Mercutio made was when he brought Romeo to a Capulets party to look at other women and forget about Rosaline. This plan backfires; Romeo does forget about Rosaline but has fallen in love with the Capulets daughter Juliet. Therefore, even though Mercutio is not irresponsible but showed rash and premature

In conclusion, there are many people to blame for the death of Mercutio, and if any one of these reasons didn’t happen, Mercutio might not have died in Act 3 Scene 1. However, I think that the most important cause of Mercutio’s death and who should take the biggest responsibility for his death is the grudge between Montague and Capulet. This is because all of the fights, including the one between

He is the one who tries to pick Romeo back up and dust him off. Even though Romeo may not have admitted it, Mercutio was portrayed as his rock. That is why when he dies, this triggers a turning point in the play for the worst, resulting in multiple deaths and even an exile. Romeo and Juliet’s plan was caused by the death of Mercutio, because if he had not fallen, Romeo would not have lost his temper and slain Tybalt in a fit of rage. Romeo feels to blame since Mercutio “…got his mortal hurt in [Romeo’s] behalf;” (III.i.106-107). In turn, Romeo strives for vengeance and achieves it through the death of Tybalt. Although Mercutio is considered to be a subsidiary character, the outcome of the story would have been much

A story that is full of love, feud, haste and fate all wrapped into one. Where two star crossed lovers take their lives. The play Romeo and Juliet written by William Shakespeare is regarding Romeo Montague and Juliet Capulet with a tragic outcome. This tale ends with the two lovers taking their lives. There are so many experiences leading up to this but who is to blame for these horrific events? Characters such as the Capulets and Montagues, Tybalt and Romeo are all to blame for the deaths of Juliet and her Romeo.

Many people can be put to blame for these two young people, including their parents, by keeping the feud between the two families going. Mercutio can be blamed, to some degree. He was the one who got Romeo to go to the ball. When Mercutio was killed, Romeo avenged his death, and ended up having to leave Verona instead of staying with Juliet.

Mercutio’s death works as a catalyst for the tragedy of Romeo and Juliet. From the moment that Mercutio is stabbed by Tybalt, the actual tragedy aspect of the play begins. Up to Mercutio’s death, the play follows a rather light-hearted, dramatized tone, but once his death plays out, the plot turns to focus on the misfortunes of the rest of the characters. Following Mercutio’s death, Romeo hints at the disasters to come by saying, “This day’s black fate on more days doth depend. This but begins the woe others must end (3.1.124-125)”. Moments after Mercutio’s death, Romeo is already aware of what troubles will arise. As Mercutio is held as Romeo’s stability, Romeo knows that something will begin from the end of Mercutio. As Mercutio’s death plays out, both Mercutio and Romeo are correct in the sense of their knowledge of Mercutio’s death being held as a catalyst, even if no one else does. If Romeo had died in the fight rather than Mercutio, the tragedy would not have happened, as Mercutio is more levelheaded than Romeo, and would have made sure the situation

Mercutio is what his name stands to be, Mercurial. Though known as a joyful and intense character, he is in fact partially to blame for the tragic death of the two young lovers. It is in fact Mercutio who convinces a young Romeo to forget about

In the play of “Romeo and Juliet”, by William Shakespeare, Tybalt is to blame for their deaths, because he killed Mercutio, Romeo's friend, leading to his banishment and Juliet misery/desperation causing her to fall into a deep sleep. Mercutio's death from Tybalt, only resulted from Tybalt provoking and insulting Romeo. As a friend Mercutio defended Romeo but in the end payed the price with his life. Shakespeare suggests that, “My very friend, hath got his mortal hurt In my behalf. My reputation stain'd With Tybalt’s slander”(Act 3, Scene 1,line 105).

In Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet, Mercutio’s death, although many people believe Tybalt was the only one to blame, many other people played a part in Mercutio’s death as well as Tybalt including Romeo and the Montagues and Capulets. Firstly, Romeo caused Mercutio’s death because he stepped in front of Mercutio, blocking his view allowing him to be stabbed, also because when Tybalt came to fight Romeo, Romeo refused but provoked the fight between Tybalt and Mercutio. The quote said by Mercutio, in act 3c scene 1 “why the devil came you between us? I was hurt under your arm.”

Who Is Responsible for the Deaths of Romeo and Juliet? Why do people who mean well end up doing the opposite? William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet demonstrates how good intentions can lead to calamity. The impulsive behaviour of Mercutio, the selfishness of Lord Capulet, the lack of communication and the spontaneous action of Friar Lawrence are causes of Romeo and Juliet’s death. Though these characters all strived to do what they thought was best for the two lovers, their good intentions misguided Romeo and Juliet leading them to a death that could have been avoided.

Purpose of the Deaths: Romeo and Juliet In the novel “No Fear Shakespeare; Romeo and Juliet” by William Shakespeare multiple characters may be responsible for the deaths of six characters in the book: Romeo, Juliet, Lady Montague, Paris, Tybalt, and Mercutio. Although Mercutio was one of the characters who was killed in the story, it is evident that Mercutio is primarily responsible for the other five characters’ deaths in the novel. Mercutio is responsible for the deaths of the other characters for two reasons, one being Mercutio is very presumptuous and overconfident. Another reason Mercutio can be blamed for the downfall of the other characters is his incompetence to control is temper or behavior.

Romeo’s dear friend, Mercutio, greatly affects the events that lead up to the death of Romeo and Juliet. Although he is a loyal friend to Romeo,

Mercutio Character Analysis Essay Did you know that Romeo and Juliet isn’t only about love and tragic death? There is a character called Mercutio that makes the story better in many ways and makes many impulsive decisions just like many other characters in the play. Shakespeare describes him as a dramatic,funny,and out of control person in the play in order to illustrate the importance of emotion in the play. He is seen as a static character because he does not change much in the story.

When Mercutio first appears in Act 1, Scene 4, he, Romeo, and Benvolio are preparing to go to Capulet’s masquerade. Romeo does not want to participate, but Mercutio convinces him (I, iv. 41-42). Romeo agrees to participate, recognizing that he may not be entirely in control of his future (I, iv. 112-113). In the next scene, Romeo meets Juliet, creating the main storyline of the play. It is obvious that this would have only occurred due to Mercutio’s influence; Romeo would not have taken part if Mercutio had not convinced him to. Romeo was feeling too dejected, and would have sat on the sidelines instead. The other major example of Mercutio’s influence in the play is exhibited in the scene in which he dies. Tybalt challenges Romeo to a duel, who declines; Romeo does not want to fight his cousin. Tybalt, however, sees this as an insult and questions Romeo’s honour. Mercutio stands up for him, and Tybalt and Mercutio fight. Romeo attempted to stop them, but he is too late; Tybalt stabbed Mercutio, before fleeing the scene. With his dying breaths, Mercutio blames Romeo for his wound, saying “…Why the devil came you between us? I was hurt under your arm.” (III, i. 98-99). Romeo realizes that Mercutio’s wound truly was his fault, and his grief is made worse when he finds that Mercutio has died. Tybalt returns to find Romeo wracked with grief. To avenge his fallen friend, Romeo challenges Tybalt to a duel, which Romeo quickly wins. There is no question that this would have happened if Mercutio had not been killed; after all, Tybalt was Romeo’s cousin, if only for a couple of hours. In this scene, Mercutio not only influences Romeo, but with his death at Tybalt’s hands leads Romeo to kill Tybalt. In addition, Mercutio influenced the members of the Capulet family as well. Lastly, Mercutio’s death lead to a string

Mercutio may seem to be a character that just adds humor and acts a jokester in the play but he served a stronger purpose as he was the catalyst that ended six people’s lives. Mercutio played a big part in how the story of Romeo and Juliet played out as he pushed the story forward. Mercutio is much more than just a supporting character in Shakespeare's play “Romeo and Juliet” because his character was a close friend of Romeo and had a large effect on Romeo’s life. He started a fight with Tybalt to defend Romeo, but was killed during the duel which then caused Romeo to avenge him by killing Tybalt. The death of Tybalt causes the exile of Romeo which is then followed by a the death of 4 more characters.