As students read the play Romeo and Juliet, they figure out that there are many possibilities as to who could be responsible for the death of Tybalt. Mercutio engrage the battle with Tybalt, this fight was the suicide battle mercuto fought, with getting romeo involved within the battle that could had been avoid, if mercuto would have stopped his sult calling. Mercutio is responsible for Tybalt’s death because he antagonizes Tybalt, he makes the fight between Tybalt and Romeo worse, and his death sparks Romeo’s emotions.
While the fight is mainly between the Montagues and Capulets, Mercutio also has his part. While Tybalt is looking for Romeo, Mercutio continues to mock him and even draws his sword on Tybalt. “Come on, sir, perform your forward
…show more content…
In scene Mercutio's final words are “I am hurt. A plague o' both your houses! I am sped.“(act 3 scene 1 page 5 line 3) Tybalt kills mercutio with one brutal stab to the chest, while romeo is trying to stop this death fight from happening. Romeo tries to break up the fight, but in the end of, he was too late still got stabbed, preventing nothing that wasn't going to happen to happen already. May a plague strike both your houses. Goddammit! I can’t believe that dog, that rat, that mouse, that cat could scratch me to death!( 3 scene 1 page 5 line 12) As mercutio dies he has one last speech of how he compares Tybalt and Romeo to animeals. by his quote of comparing both Tybalt and Romeo to dogs, rats, mouses, and cats could kill him, and in a sense can be interrupted as Mercutio thinking he’s superior than the others around him. This killed mercutio and ended the dual, but enraged someone else, that would kill the killer.
After Mercutio Romeo’s very dear friend died, this triggered a rage unseen within him before to striking Tybalt before thinking about it. “Away to heaven, respective lenity,
And fire-eyed fury be my conduct now.” (act 3 scene 1 line 86) This is clear inacutstin that romeo is blinded by his anger like tybalt justs was a moment before this story changing moment happen. “Fire-eyed fury” is a incomprehensible wrath, this
Mercutio has enough of Tybalt’s insults to his friend and takes matters into his own hands. Big mistake. Romeo stands between the two men and ends up getting Mercutio stabbed. Tybalt and Mercutio are literal and metaphorical
Romeo was enraged that Tybalt has killed Mercutio and he regrets not fighting him for the sake of his love for Juliet. However, once Tybalt goes back to them, he declares that they will fight and that either one of them or both of them will be going up to heaven with Mercutio. A quote from the text that supports this point is when Benvolio rushed a warning to Romeo that Tybalt was walking back to them. To Romeo, Benvolio says, “Here comes the furious Tybalt back again.”. Romeo responds saying, “Alive in triumph—and Mercutio slain!
They have made worms meat of me,” (3.1, 68-69). This quote exemplifies that although Mercutio is neither a Montague nor a Capulet he still dies in a battle fought between the families. This incident heightens Romeo’s fatal flaw, as his reckless act of heroism turned out to be a burden as it caused the death of Mercutio. Moreover, Mercutio’s plague towards the families also foreshadows further tragedy, as Romeo then gets banished from the Verona, along with additional events which later on result to his death. Last, even after his death, Mercutio acts as a foil character to Romeo by causing a shift in Romeo’s gentle character. For example, after Tybalt slays Mercutio, Romeo avenges his friend by killing Tybalt. This act shows his alteration in character, as he was never seen as a ferocious character in any previous scenes. This is evident in the play when Romeo says, “Away to Heaven, respective lenity, and fire-eyed fury be my conduct now,” (3.1, 125-126). This quote exemplifies Romeo’s new perception, as he claims he is finished with sympathy and gentleness. This change in Romeo’s personality is significant because not only is he going to attack Tybalt, but also he is going to kill him, which then entitles him a murderer. This is significant because it further leads to his banishment, which in all leads to his death. The transition in the persona of Romeo is highlighted by the character Mercutio, which leads to the
In the tragedy Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare, one character is responsible for the deaths a both Romeo and Juliet. That character is Mercutio. He was the reason why Romeo went to the ball and the reason why Romeo killed Tybalt and got himself banished. He brash attitude led to the deaths of Tybalt, Romeo, Juliet, Paris, and Lady Montegue. If he had thought he actions through the tragedy could've been averted.
“And but one word with one of us? couple it with something, make it a word and a blow.” [III, i, 37-38] Tybalt was not willing to fight mercutio if mercutio had not escalated tybalt's anger. Moreover, Mercutio could have avoided this situation if he had showed respect in return.This comes to show how mercutio had made impulsive decisions instead of making rational decisions. As a result, we can see Mercutio's death occurs due to his rash and impulsive decisions. Mercutio’s impulsive acts result in his own passing. When Romeo refuses to participate in a duel with Tybalt, Mercutio challenges Tybalt himself. Using words which are highly intimidating and threatening, Mercutio gives Tybalt no choice but to engage in a duel. The following violent words are exchanged between the two characters.
Mercutio was a very serene man who assisted the Montague family in numerous ways. He defended their honor and took it as his own responsibility to withhold their values and name. Mercutio died in a heroic duel in which the villain Tybalt stabs him, which leads to a fatal wound. Mercutio fought Tybalt to defend Romeo’s and Montague’s honor. He cherished his life and did not deserve to die because he loved life to the fullest. He was always true and loyal to Romeo. He always had something to say and wouldn’t leave anyone unsatisfied. We can all conclude that Mercutio is very proud of Romeo, as shortly after Mercutio dies, Romeo kills Tybalt. Mercutio was always there for anyone who was despondent or having an unfavorable day. He always knew
They both died because of their extensive lust for war, but not only that. Mercutio died for his blood ruthless instinct. Tybalt died because of his constant quest for retribution. Mercutio challenges Tybalt, as he is trying to look for Romeo, “O calm, dishonourable, vile submission, Alla Stoccata carries it away. Tybalt, you rat-catcher, will you walk”. With Romeo in mind, Mercutio wants to fight. He loves the thrill, he wants death. Who most fit than the violent Capulet, Tybalt, he passes it off as a heroic scene. He could have done nothing, but his ego wants this, we have seen in past scenes Mercutio cares not for Romeo, enough to risk his life. Often humiliating and insulting Romeo. He was inevitably going to duel Tybalt, he just needed a push, his death, even though constantly being blamed on Romeo, is Mercutio's fault. After he kills Mercutio, Tybalt says before his demise,“Thou, wretched boy, that didst consort him here Shalt with him hence”. His own arrogant pride has really proved to be his fatal weakness, not only did he kill himself, but Mercutio as well, this arrogant pride is the reason the tragedy happens. In my experience with the story people have come to believe that Tybalt has no problems with the Montagues, but he tries to prove himself to his uncle, he does this to feed his ego. Glancing over both characters; they might seem very
When Mercutio and Tybalt fight they Benvolio's grip and stabs Mercutio under Romeo's arm. Tybalt and Mercutio fought purely on rage and Romeo and Benvolio knew that if the prince knew they were fighting they would be executed. So they intervened in hope to save Mercutio and Tybalt’s Lives. Mercutio was then stabbed under Tybalt's arm.”This gentleman, the prince's near ally, My very friend, hath got his mortal hurt In my behalf; my reputation stain'd With Tybalt's slander,--Tybalt, that an hour Hath been my kinsman! O sweet Juliet, Thy beauty hath made me effeminate And in my temper softened valour's steel!” Mercutio was fighting in the name of Romeo with intention of his protection. But Romeo intervened revealing that this was against his will and that Mercutio was fighting out of hatred so he was killed by
Love has already overcome him and controls all of his thoughts and actions. This love prevents Mercutio from saving Romeo and keeping peace between the families. In Act 3, scene 1, Mercutio fights Tybalt on behalf of Romeo and his relationship with Romeo. Romeo attempts to break up the fight, but Tybalt stabs Mercutio. As he is dying, Mercutio says, "A plague o' both your houses!
. Firstly, Tybalt is to blame for Mercutio’s death as he actually gave him the wound that killed him. Also, Tybalt provokes Mercutio by insulting Romeo, ‘Thou art a villain.’ This is one of the biggest insults that Tybalt can give and would usually be followed by a duel. However, Romeo calmly replies by saying ‘Villain I am none / Therefore farewell. I see thou know’st me not.’ Because Romeo is not defending his honour, Mercutio is provoked by Tybalt’s insults and starts insulting Tybalt himself. This is what leads to the two of them fighting and Mercutio getting his fatal wound. So, if Tybalt didn’t insult Romeo or fight Mercutio, Mercutio wouldn’t have been killed.
Additionally, after Romeo’s marriage with Juliet he gets in the middle of a fight. If Romeo did not engage in the brawl between Mercutio his best friend and Tybalt his opposing rival, they would still have a fair chance at survival. Mercutio engages in a fight with Tybalt on Romeo’s behalf because Romeo refuses to fight Tybalt, since Tybalt is now Romeo’s cousin-in-law. In addition, Romeo attempts to break up the progressive fight, but his actions are futile. Furthermore, Romeo getting among Mercutio and Tybalt does more harm than good because Mercutio dies. The only explanation of how Mercutio dies is that Tybalt is able to pierce Mercutio’s chest under Romeo’s arm. Romeo blocks Mercutio’s view, leaving him defenseless and feeble.
Secondly Tybalt sends a decree for a fight and he kills Mercutio. This is shown by “I will not budge for no man’s pleasure, I”. This reveals that Mercutio wants to have a fight with Tybalt. Tybalt wants to have a fight with Romeo the most but Mercutio gets in the way. Mercutio feels that he must stand by the Montague’s. He feels he needs to be a true Montague and fight. Romeo retaliates and kills Tybalt in anger and revenge for his friend. This is apparent in the line “Either thou or I, or both, must go with him. This conveys that Romeo felt he had to get revenge for Mercutio but he really didn’t mean to kill Tybalt and couldn’t believe that he’d actually done it.
In contrast, Mercutio attempts to stop Tybalt’s thirst for vengeance when he tries to duel Romeo but ultimately gets killed in the process of trying to save his good friend from being killed by Tybalt which causes Romeo to take vengeance upon Tybalt by killing him.
One day Romeo and his friends were together, just hanging out. A few moments later Tybalt came who was a very rude type of guy he was part of the Capulets family and was Juliet’s cousin. He walked to Romeo and his friends and confronted them and started cause a scene. Mercutio, who was one of Romeos good friends had gotten up and started to talk back Tybalt and they began to fight. Eventually it leads to Mercutio’s death
In the streets of Verona a fight breaks loose causing Tybalt to accidentally stab Mercutio instead of Romeo. Romeo says, “Alive in triumph, and Mercutio slain? Away to heaven respective lenity, And fire-eyed fury be my conduct now! Now, Tybalt, take the ‘villain’ back again That late thou gavest me; for Mercutio’s soul Is but a little way above our heads, staying for thine to keep him company. Either thou or I, or both, must go with him” (Act 3, Scene i, Lines 121-128)