Merit Based Immigration Case Study

Nice’s article focuses on the aspects of the 1990 Immigration Act which relate to employment visas. She explains that this legislature will result in an overall increase of immigration to America in her statement, “Effective October 1, 1991, there will be almost a three-fold increase in employment-based permanent resident visas.” Although, she does construes that these visas will be mainly for skilled workers, “Persons seeking to enter the United States as immigrants on the basis of an offer of employment from a U.S. employer may do so in larger numbers under the new law as long as they present unique expertise, training and experience,” on the flip side, “Immigrant visas for unskilled workers, such as domestics, will be restricted, requiring approximately twice the current waiting period” (Nice). The overall growth in American immigration in the 1990s was most likely due to the Immigration Act of 1990. In the Effects of immigrants on the 1980-1990 U.S. wage experience by Maria E. Enchautegui, the author explains that “According to the 1990 Census, 8.6 million immigrants

Ewing, Walter. "The Many Facets Of Effective Immigration Reform." Society 47.2 (2010): 110. MasterFILE Premier. Web. 23 July 2016.

U.S.A Economy: An increasingly vital role. Immigration Policy Focus. Volume 1, Issue 2. PP. 4-16.

In recent headlines, the H-1B visa has come become a debatable topic. The number of visas distributed to skilled workers (H-1B) and who receives them, and whether the United States should increase or decrease the amount. Currently, the H-1B visa system is structure to administer 65,000 H-1B visas (Services, H-1B Fiscal Years (FY) 2014 Cap Season). According to the United States Citizenship and Immigration, 124,000 petitions were received during the 2013 fiscal year. (Services, H-1B Fiscal Years (FY) 2014 Cap Season). Some are suggesting that we need more skilled immigrant labor within our country for innovative and entrepreneurial exploration, while others are opposed to such a change and would prefer a decrease in the number of

However, the benefits that this brings to Claifornia and overall, the nation, substanttially outweigh the negative effects of such acts. In face, the denial of immigrants proved to the most unfortunate in 2010 when "the H=1B visa denials cost U. S.-born tech workers as many as 28,234 additional jobs and as much as $2,747,775,000 in missed wages" proving that not only does California have the power to advance even further economically with their large borders easily accessible for immigrants but maliciously affected the economy of California which, in the grand scheme of things, affects the country's economy.

These leaders misguidedly create an unfair standard that makes skilled immigrants not qualified of an American job and actually believe and stand by the idea that they are stealing American jobs away. On the contrary, for example, evidence is beginning to prove that skilled immigrants implement the bulk of Silicon Valley startups which result in the creation of numerous jobs. According to entrepreneur, Vivek Wadhwa, improper and burdensome U.S. immigration policies are creating a buildup in the granting of permanent resident visas, ensuing in the dismissal of countless highly educated entrepreneurs, which end up placing these entrepreneurs and the potential for economic improvements outside of the United States. Vivek Wadhwa’s article shows us how the U.S. continues to remain oblivious to the economic benefits it can acquire through the retaining of skilled immigrants. Wadhwas demonstrates that other countries are aware of the potential growth skilled immigrants can bring to their country and the United States needs to wake

In this paper, I decided to analyze the immigration policy. The immigration policies have had a deep history. The policies have been twisted, in the long run, to meet the demands of the time. However, most of the times, the policies have been unfair especially in regard to the immigrants. The overview contains a rich history of the policy progression and advancements in the immigration sector. In this paper, I decided to extrapolate on some few contemporary issues that are as a result of the immigration policies and laws. One of the contentious issues is the Visa policy. This is a system that is widely used by the US government. Though formulated with a good purpose, the formulation did not cater for everything that is associated with immigration. For instance, the immigrants who are on transit for employment are not selected based on the employment demand in the market, hence, they end up being stranded and thus are forced to accept low-paying jobs with poor working conditions. The solution to this is also discussed in the paper. I have also discussed on the open door policy and its implications which include overpopulation. Overpopulation on its part has directly affected both the immigrants and natives with many adverse effects. I was able to do research, and I consequently came up with a set of alternative methods that could be of help. However, I have also discussed

Subsequently, Bloomberg reports that a new H-1B bill is in the process of being passed to further scrutinize the requirements of employing foreign workers in specialty occupations within the United States. Moreover, it seems that the executive order has not only led to an increased focus on obtaining the best skill from immigrants but, attempts to weed out the issue that has existed for a long time, outsourcing cheap labor. The “recipients of the H-1B visas are outsourcers, primarily from India, who run the technology departments of large corporations with largely imported staff” (Elstrom, Rai, 26-28), as a result, companies such as Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp which is one of the heaviest users of the H-1B program, is seeing its shares fall 4.4% of its original $58 quote. The significance of the article to me is found through the events that unfold as a result of the executive

I believe that the future success of the United States depends on a renewed commitment to individual rights over an emphasis on the common good. For example, if the government would provide healthcare to all citizens in the United States, in essence, it would be forcing citizens to pay for the healthcare of others through taxes. This violates the people’s right to spend their money in the way that they choose, limiting Americans’ disposable income and potentially hurting our economy. An additional example concerns immigration. The government should most definitely limit immigration and carefully scrutinize those they let in to protect citizen’s right to the pursuit of happiness. If too many immigrants are let into the US, they would be competing

In this situation there are 4 main stakeholders that are presented; the employees with the H-2B visas, the American employees in the same industry, the employer companies and the U.S. government. Considering each stakeholder’s situation we see that there is a variety of interests in this case and the way it develops. First off the main interest for the employees holding an H-2B visa have a main interest in making money in the US to create a better life for themselves and their families. Also they have the interest of getting the opportunity of entering the U.S. and attempting to acquire

The immigration policy decision are being placed in the hands of people who have not faced the risks immigrants have faced. The current US immigration policy is to deport anyone who is caught living in the US illegally. While I do not believe the US borders should be open to anyone because of the risks of terrorism, I do believe that in certain situations the United States should welcome refugees and other people. Many refugees come to the United States because of the safety and economic security it provides. By allowing refugees into the United States it could possibly mean more allies for the US. Other types of people who should be allowing to come into the United States are people

Generally all this enormous numbers of immigrant workers show and clarify one point that immigration alone does not explain starkly different outcomes for U.S.-born workers. If the country is continuing to deny and debate immigration policy, measures of economic impact won’t anyway resolve the argument one way or another. (“Does Immigration Hurt U.S. Workers?”)

The United States immigration system is mainly based on employment creation, family reunification, recognition of refugees and needed work skills. In addition to this, there is a lottery for people who come from countries with low rates of immigration to the United States. To determine if you are eligible under one of the paths that lead to a lawful permanent residency. Some of these paths are:

Following the 9/11 attacks, the United States put stringent measures on the visa immigration regulations (Laque, 2011). The move faced statewide criticisms from the universities and lobbyists groups. The petitions forced the government to revisit the laws that they had closed off to attract and retain the high-skilled labor force that it required. The changes in regulations lowered the proactive participation of the U.S. in the market to attract and retain the students. The current pattern indicates a reduced number of students coming into the United States. The main activists for the change in immigration stance were the high-tech companies. The companies are highly dependent on the talent that the international students bring to the job market.

Critics of the STEM movement argue that H1-B visas are a means for companies to obtain workers at