Merryman And Stolen Art Analysis

Even though this issue has begun to die out of the archaeological spotlight, it is still of importance to every anthropologist. Repatriation has undergone continuous consideration by anthropologists, politicians, and Native Americans alike. Overall, the repatriation process has had a profound effect on the discipline of anthropology and the cultural processes of American Indians, in addition to the politics of anthropology and archaeology in the United States. One of the biggest downfalls of current repatriation legislation is its lack of protection of Archaic and Paleoindian remains and cultural materials. The laws encompass more recent burials, but simply cannot extend their coverage further into the past. While there is still room to improve in creating even stronger policies to rule out uncertainties regarding repatriation, many positives have come from the legislation.

Cultural artifacts should not be returned to the region of Origin. Evidence is shown in the passage, “Returning Antiquities to Their Countries of Origin” paragraph 1, “Museums acquire works to display from many different

These issues with museums and other institutions has led many tribes to not only protest these collections and demand the most sacred items back, but to also develop their own institution that not only tell the real story of their people from a non scientific point of view, but also show the proper resect for the sacred and religious artifacts. Religious sights and objects are a piece of many different groups culture, many of which require a certain level of respect. Within the United States Native American groups are reclaiming these objects for their own

The assignment will require you to explore several website to learn more about their efforts, examine one case of art theft and identify why art is so valuable. Prepare a five paragraph essay citing at least two sources.

Politics within nations and communities influences the finding of art artifacts and the eventual explanation of the art artifacts because they decide who has the right to claim it. If an archeologist finds an artifact that belongs to a nation or community and has significance, then the archaeologist can’t claim it. This can cause archaeologists and art historians to feel a certain pressure within their research projects because they can’t retaliate if a community claims the artifact they’ve been researching and studying. However, when the rightful community claims the artifact, they may be able to add insight into the meaning of the artifact because it belongs to them so they may know more about

There is an ongoing art-ownership debate over paintings and other art stolen from European Jews during the Holocaust of World War II (1939-45). As Jews were sent to concentration camps, Nazi German soldiers looted valuable art from their homes. During the ensuing decades, some of that art landed in major museums on display, prompting Holocaust survivors and the families of Holocaust victims to ask that those works be returned to them.

According to, “ARTSY EDITORIAL BY ISAAC KAPLAN,” Isaac was very correct the people are missing the point. We want to protect our art not destroy them. We do want new art but we want it legal and safe. Not a present from during a war. That’s not how we want our art delivered, From criminals. We want the antiquities protected and not let people during war be the cause of destroying and or selling stolen art to America. “This legislation was designed to try and tackle what is a worldwide problem but also a problem internal to this U.S. government about how it coordinates its own response.”

Antiques, they are hundreds, maybe thousands years old, but what if someone just took them from you. You would want them back, right? This valuable prized possession, someone just, stole. Well, imagine it a bit more extreme. That has been the major problem in Egypt for many years. Britain, France, and other surrounding countries have been stealing major antiquities from Egypt illegally for a long time. These countries should give back Egypt’s antiquities because, they deserve to be in their country of origin, these artifacts represent Egyptian culture, and Egyptian antiquities are not only limited to staying in the pyramids.

Is cultural property even necessary and does it factor into basic development? Along with these problems, human flourishing may in fact favor preservation if we look to the duties we owe those people in the past to finish and maintain the projects that they

The repatriation of cultural artifacts and pieces of art refers to the return of these items to their country of origin. Although this seems to be an overwhelmingly positive action taken to reunite ancient artifacts with their culture, the process can also prevent intercultural blending and encourage cultural segregation. As James Cuno expressed in the supplemental article “To Repatriate or Not to Repatriate, That is the Question….James Cuno’s Case Against Repatriating Museum Artifacts”, returning cultural artifacts to their homeland first entails taking from the country in which they reside. While this seems rather harmless, preventing intercultural fusion could destroy the education of and respect for outside cultures. Because of this, in

There are many similarities in the ethical statements/codes of the SAA, SHA, AIA, and RPA. The ones that pertain to this case are as follows: it is the responsibility of archaeologists to work for the long-term conservation and protection of the archaeological record (SAA 1, AIA 1, RPA 1.1-e). The buying and selling of objects out of archaeological context is contributing to the destruction of the archaeological record around the world, and these items should not be traded, sold, bought, or bartered as commercial goods (SAA 3, SHA 6, AIA 2, RPA 1.2-e). Within reasonable time, the knowledge archaeologists gain

I don’t think artifacts should be relocated to museums for many reasons. First, in Machu Picchu someone found treasures and was supposed to be on loan for 12 months, but never got returned. Next, some of the artifacts are grave sight like the Titanic. For example, when the survivors of the Titanic, died they got cremated and had it scattered on the Titanic. Then, the Inca builds a palace for the son of Pachacuti. So, When the artifacts are returning, it is like to bring back family goods.

On March 1, 2001, two of the worlds most important pieces of Buddhist art were destroyed. Currently, there is a similar site facing the same fate. The destruction of Buddhist art is often linked to the destruction of cultural heritage. Because art is the best window we have into the origins and growth of a culture, it is important to preserve this source of history. With the destruction of each piece of art, we loose a part of our past as a human race, whether it be your own culture or not. The issues facing Buddhist art should matter to us all as it is not only a problem the religion has faced before, but a very urgent situation that required immediate action.

Throughout history, art has caused wars and forged alliances. In modern times, cultural treasures are being sorted into place after much misplacement. Restitution/repatriation, the act of returning cultural treasures to their rightful owners or nation of origin, often ensues difficult legal decisions, but remains a moral necessity. This act of returning cultural treasures, grows more common due to the media’s interest or publicized legal battles. The movie “The Woman in Gold,” involving Gustav Klimt’s painting of Adele Bloch-Bauer, is an example of the influence it has on media.

The conceptual basis of this thesis is cultural heritage, therefore a critical analysis of the ideology associated with the terms, culture and heritage, is fundamental to understanding their development throughout time and within international legal instruments. The first chapter of this