Meta Analysis : What Meta Analytic Article Did You Find Most Helpful And Why

The purpose of a systematic review is to attempt to find, evaluate and synthesize high quality research relevant to the research question. A systematic review uses carefully developed data collection and sampling procedures that are put in place in advance as a protocol. (Polit, 2012). A systematic review must contain the following: a clear inclusion and exclusion criteria, an explicit search strategy, systematic coding and analysis of included studies, and a meta-analysis if possible. (Hemingway & Brereton, 2009). Systematic reviews are conducted by nurse researchers to avoid reaching incorrect or misleading conclusions that

Describe your writing process for this paper: How did you choose an article to analyze? What methods did you use to read and analyze the article? What methods did you use to brainstorm your ideas? How did you decide on the organization of your paper?

Take the point of view of Brendtro, Mitchell, & Doncaster (2011) and analyze the article(s) you selected in #3. Using these authors’ arguments from their “Practice-Based Evidence: Back to the Future” article, what would be their evaluation of the article(s) you selected?

What search terms did you use to locate this research study to analyze? What database did you use? What was your rationale for selecting this particular study to analyze over the others identified in the search results? What is the full reference for the study in APA format?

What search terms did you use to locate this research study to analyze? What database did you use? What was your rationale for selecting this particular study to analyze over the others identified in the search results? What is the full reference of for the study in APA format?

Results (what were the basic results of the study, how did the authors draw conclusions, how did they display their data, are their conclusions justified) (1pt)

Systematic reviews allow researchers to to determine the best research evidence to address a health care situation. In disease management and casemanagement specialities, the clincial guidelines for managing chronic health conditions are developed from Systemic reviews ( Groves, et al., 2013). Meta- analysis involves the use of results from previous studies; it involves quasi-experimental and experimental studies and stastical analysis are applied to provide the most desired evidence for an intervention, whiles Meta synthesis uses qualitative studies which main focus is interpretation of a specific study for use as evidenced research (Groves, et al., 2013). Lasty, mixed methods systematic review involves the utilization of independent studies which are conducted through narrative and invloves both quantitative and qualitative methods(Groves, et al.,

* Identify the theoretical or conceptual framework used in a peer-reviewed article on healthcare research.

To conduct Meta-analysis, researchers define the empirical question(s) that are the focus of the review and identify the variables and conditions to be considered. Then, researchers define the independent and dependent variables. To collect the relevant studies, researchers include criteria for the studies and code it to guide the searching process. When the studies are coded, researchers can calculate the effect size, which will help them conduct comparisons and calculate the overall effect

A meta-analysis of seven different studies, an experimental study, a quasi-experimental study, and two non-experimental studies were used in this research process. The meta-analysis provided level one strength evidence and was of good quality for scientific evidence. The experimental study presented level one strength evidence and was also of good quality for scientific evidence. The quasi-experimental study had level two strength evidence and provided high-quality scientific evidence. Both of the non-experimental studies provided level three strength evidence and high-quality scientific evidence.

How did you select this research study to analyze? That is, what search terms did you use? What database did you use? What was your rationale for selecting this particular study to analyze over the others identified in the search results? What is the full reference for the study in APA format?

2. Discuss the generalizability and validity of the study. For example, will findings of this study generalize to other people and/or situations, can we generalize from the study participants to the general population, and do the methods employed have validity?

What search terms did you use to locate this research study to analyze? What database did you use? What was your rationale for selecting this particular study to analyze over others identified in this search results? What is the full reference for the study?

Cullen and Gendreau compare and contrast the many studies on this subject, the meta-analyses conclusions, their strengths, weaknesses, inconsistencies, and the trends that follow the studies

On March 22, 2014, Annemarie K. Loth, Deborah A. G Drabrick, Ellen Leibenluft, and Leslie A. Hulvershorn released an article called Do Children Externalizing disorders predict adult depression? A Meta-Analysis. This article is located in the J Abnorm Child Psychol (2014) vol. 42, page 1103-1113. The given study was to analyze children with symptoms or the disorder of depression and the growth of adult depression. They preformed a statistical procedure for combining date from multiple to achieve their meta-analysis result. It was believed that children's psychopath disorders would be able predict depression for adulthood. The researchers hypothesis believed that there will be a connection between adult depression happen due to children showing