Metacognitive Regulation Paper

Duttweiler, P. (1984). The Internal Control Index: a newly developed measure of locus of control. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 44(2), 209-221.

I believe that self-control is a very important characteristic of a moral life because it makes our actions, most likely, come out with a moral outcome. Let’s say that you are lying on the beach and you spot someone drowning in the water. What do you do? If you apply self-control and Virtue or Kantian ethics, you can perform the action.

Incidents and Influences: As I observed this students I began to notice a low level of achievement with an external locus of control. He seem to blame his failure in his writing journal to past experiences, saying that “I can’t do this” and “ I hate writing”. Other locus of control consist of effort when he put his head on his desk. When the teacher asked if he would like a study

In order to comprehend external locus of control we must learn its pair, internal locus of control. According to Myers (2013), we have an internal locus of control, controlled by our own effects in the

Hirshi and Gottfredson explain in their theory that self-control is a major attribute that factors into the

I believe that I have an internal locus of control because most of my answers seemed to come from a place of reason rather than hoping on blind luck. The role this plays in my ability to make positive health-related decisions is that it allows me to think things through and realize that it is my choice to become healthy not waiting for

Locus of control refers to whether or not an individual believes that the outcome of an event is decided by one’s own free will or by fate (Rotter, 1966). A person with higher internal locus of control may

Self-control to me is an oxymoron and a metaphor. At the beginning of everything there is nothing. It is self-control that enables us to ensure that something replaces that

Rotter’s locus of control is a belief about whether one has control over one’s environment or not. An external locus of control indicates a belief that one is controlled by environment and situations; internal locus of control indicated a belief that one has control over one’s behaviors and abilities. Initially, Patrick was unsure whether his success was a result of his own efforts or his father’s influence and intervention. This insecurity indicated an external locus of control, but Patrick also works hard for his success. This can be seen as an internal locus of control. He control his outcome and success through maintaining his superior academic

There are two different locus of control. One is internal and one is external. If you have an internal locus of control you feel in control of your life and the events that occur in them. If you have an external locus of control you feel that you do not have control over your life or the events that occur in them. Depending on which locus of control you have can be directly related to your self-esteem and self-concept. People who have high self-esteem and self-concept are going to have an internal locus of control. Whereas, people who have low self-esteem and self-concept will most likely have an external locus of control (Lamberton & Minor, 2014).

whereas externals believe that feedback to be strictly due to forces outside of their control (Schultz & Schultz, 2013). Locus of control is a concept developed by Julian Rotter as part of his own social-learning approach to psychology. Haynes and Ayliffe (1991) utilize a theory of internal and external attribution that parallels Rotter’s locus of control, specifying attribution as an important mental process when addressing self accountability. Internal attribution is behavioral change that is instigated internally by the individual, such as a conscious decision to modify behavior. External attribution is change that is caused by outside factors such as medication or disease (Haynes & Ayliffe, 1991). An excellent example of these concepts is an alcoholic who is told

Jean Twenge and San Diego State University analyzed the questionnaires made by Julian Rotter in the late 1950s. This set of questions was to figure out how much control the student had based on the Internal-External Locus of Control Scale. The “internal locus of control” was the idea that a person is responsible for their own success, as “external locus of control” is the belief that an external force or good fortune determines a person’s future. For example, a question might be “(a) Whatever

According to Przybylsk, “Internal locus of control was defined as the belief that positive and negative life events are a consequence of one’s own actions, whereas external locus of control was defined as the belief that positive and negative life events are unrelated to one’s own behavior and so are beyond one’s control”(2010, p. 229). In my current clinical practice, I believe in the internal locus of control as defined by Przybylsk. The stressors in life such as: going through divorce, illness, living in poverty and even changes an individual job can have an effect on their health or psychological well -being. In the article, Przybylsk mentioned how studies have shown how a diabetic can have a delay in healing of their wound ulcer as a result of stress, anxiety and depression. In idea of internal locus of control, the negative life events can cause emotional distress and make the individual find difficulty with coping with the current

Do not try to simplify with the impression that internal is good and external is bad, both styles have a meaningful effect on our motivations, expectations, self-esteem, risk-taking behavior and even on the consequences of our actions. In taking the locus of control assessment, I have realized that I have a more internal locus of control than external. I believe that drive and free will define me, whereas, external factors like genetics, fate, and luck have little or no effect. When I have confrontations with others I feel that I exhibit a less effective locus of control. It is difficult for me to react in a situation where I feel backed into a corner, I suddenly feel inferior and incapable. If I just remember that I am in control of myself and my actions, I can control a situation that might get out of hand and bring it to a reasonable place where the problem can be resolved effectively and in a calm

Generally Metacognition is defined as “how individual monitor and control their cognitive process” (Young & Fry, 2008). Metacognition refers to being able to reflect upon, understand, and control one’s learning. Previous accounts of metacognition have differentiated between two major components, including knowledge about cog¬nition and regulation of cognition (Brown, 1987; Flavell, 1987; Jacobs & Paris, 1987). Knowledge about cognition includes three sub processes that simplify the reflective aspect of metacognition: declarative knowledge (i.e., knowledge about self and about strategies), procedural knowledge (i.e., knowledge about how to use strategies), and conditional knowledge (i.e., knowledge