Metropolitan Museum Essay

The viewer can see and feel the bond between the mother and the child. I also think the artwork is beautiful and makes a deep impression on the viewer, because of the innocence and peaceful appearance of the infant. The woman has such an intense gaze with the way she is looking at the infant; it gives each viewer an opportunity to interpret it in their own way, concern or admiration, all part of motherhood. The woman’s body language is intriguing because she is replicating the infant’s arm position, maybe to find her own peace. In my search, I discovered that Berthe Morisot was a famous female artist in the 19th century, and in making a choice, this piece of art quickly caught my

The painting, ‘Virgin and Child with Donor’, by Antoniazzo Romano, despite painting a similar scene, possesses several differences. The most notable difference is the fact that the work of art was crafted on an entirely different medium, which was the ‘Tempera and gold leaf on wood’, according to the museum’s description. The painting is similar to Rogier van der Weyden’s work in its depiction of the Virgin Mary with very soft, blended features. The facial expression of the Virgin Mary is also very like that of Rogier van der Weyden’s painting as well, conveying a sense of peace and

One thing that I remember seeing at the Philadelphia Art Museum that I learned in class was the Shiva, Lord of the dance statue. Some of the things

The picture above was among the masterpieces in the Inconolatria, a Latin term which means “the worship of images”, exhibit by Sandra Dans. It is from the I AM collection depicting “the self”. The artwork shows a girl sitting in the couch in her dark sala where the light was brought by an angel’s presence. The angel is giving her a flower while she reaches out for it. The table infront of her lies a plate with slices of eaten watermelons, a phone, and a mug, while the window sill on the side of the angel rests a few crumpled papers, and a jar with a flower.

The Painting that we are writing about today is called the “Madonna the magnificat”, it was created in 1481, the painter is Sandro Botticelli, and the medium is tempura. This painting depicts Mary and baby Jesus, there is a lot of detail put into the symmetry of Sandro's paintings, and especially with this one because it is so close to the faces of the characters. The majority of Sandro's paintings are of biblical or mythological theme and the characters that are in his painting are always dressed like they are either royalty or they are actual mythological

One of the inquiries that has been raised about this scene is the personality of the figures beside God. Given her favored situation under the arm of God, the female figure is apparently an essential one. Generally, she has been thought to be Eve, the future wife of Adam, who holds up to the side until she is made out of Adam's rib. All the more as of late, nonetheless, a hypothesis has been skimmed this is really the Virgin Mary, who assumes this position of honor by God and the tyke alongside her, who might consequently be the Christ Kid. This perspective is bolstered by the position of God's fingers on the youngster – the same fingers that the cleric would use to raise the Eucharist amid the Mass. Since Catholic religious philosophy holds that the Eucharist is the Collection of Christ, this philosophical comprehension would be exemplified in this work of art. In the event that this last elucidation is right, the Production of Adam would be characteristically connected to the future happening to Christ, who comes to accommodate man after the transgression of

While searching several amazing online museums I had in mind locating something in relation to the Archangel Gabriel. I find biblical pieces to really speak to me and I wanted to learn more about Gabriel. I originally found the Miniature Plaque: Archangel Gabriel in soapstone but found it not so easy to find exact pictures or sufficient information. Instead I found something even better with so much detail and unspoken holiness. The Met has a piece known as “Saints and Scenes from the Life of the Virgin”. It is a left panel/wing of a portable triptych of which the center has yet to be located. I was in amazement with the left half as

The painting is a full spectrum representation of the beauty of Christ and Mary with a focus on realism. It makes perfect sense seeing as many renaissance painters focused more on those classical themes and the anatomical structures of the human body beginning around this time frame. According to Top 10 Florence and Tuscany, the concept of Madonna and Child as a work of art spans far back to Byzantine era of art, which focused less on the anatomical realism of the Italian renaissance but more in the realms of telling a theological story. Both byzantine and renaissance shared similar themes on this particular work but with different methods of execution. With Lorenzo's version, the painting captures the idealistic, serene pureness of the mother and child while pushing those theological themes onto the viewer. This was done to ensure that the readers saw both figures as nothing less than the embodiment of perfection seeing as the child is the god born son. Also, this plays a part in showcasing the motherly love Mary has for her newborn child. Strong Christian values played heavily into the works color scheme and patterns by strengthening the angelic representation of both figures. According to my earlier notes, Monaco crafted the altarpiece for Monte Oliveto, which was a local monastery that was a frequent patron of Monaco's art. That makes perfect sense, seeing as the main audience of this work would be devoted followers of

huge Gothic church where most paintings were much bigger in proportion. It was probably made for a wealthy man at the time. In the Renaissance it was common for wealthy people to collect artworks, it had a social significance. Above this, religious paintings and prayer books were manifestations of commitment to prayer. The Flemish didnʼt limit their demonstration of piety to the public realm, the individuals commissioned artworks for private use in their homes as well. " Ideology of the time also influenced the painting. The Madonna is holding the child

Before visiting the Walter’s Art Museum, I was thinking about which topic I should be focusing on. At first, I was thinking Asian Arts might be the easiest topic for me to do the term paper. Since I got some Asian cultural background. However, this museum doesn’t have a lot of Asian arts on display that really interesting to me. Mostly, I see were Chinese ceramics and potteries. I was hoping to see some calligraphy and handscrolls on display at the museum then seeing those artworks on their website. As I continue looking around, I realized this museum has a lot of great collection with tons of variety; Roman, Greece, Egyptian, Renaissance, Asian, and Medieval arts.

During the Gothic and High Renaissance periods the increase of the churches popularity influenced many artists to depict biblical senses in their artwork. In Virgin and Child from Saint-Denis, presents an expressive Mary delicately cradling her child Christ. In contrast Raphael’s Small Cowper Madonna uses a balance of harmony and celebration of humanity to portray an authoritative and solid painting of an affectionate Mary while holding her son Christ.

As I look at the painting of The Adoration of The Shepherds, two artists, Andrea Mantegna and El Greco, showed it different ways with same subjects. First, the title of the paintings is about Jesus's birth. Andrea mantegna artist had lived from ca 1430 to 1506. He established his reputation when he was 20 years old. This painting is the evident of his highly individual style. He worked it during ca 1451 to 1453. He painted it in horizontal format with 153/4x217/8(40x55.6). He used tempera on a canvas that transferred from a wood. In difference, El Greco(Spain 141-1641) worked it with oil color on canvas by vertical format. The size is 125 5/8x707/8(319x180cm). In Greco's painting, the objects are full on the canvas

In Rogier Weyden’s Virgin and child, the artist uses idealism, overlapping, dull color palette, lack of space, and smooth textures to create a calm, intimate effect on the viewer. In the painting the artist uses an idealized Mary, in which she looks like the women of the norm during the fifteenth-century, by receding her hair line to her upper forehead. The hands are overlapping the child to show us that Mary is picking up her son and pulling him to her cheek. Mary makes a clear indication that her son is christ by her slight tilt of the head towards her son. The lack of space in the twelve by nine inches really emphasizes the intimacy between mother and child. The artist uses of the same dull white-grey color on both Mary and her child to establish another mother-son relationship. The oil on wood painting gives a smooth texture to the overall composition.

The painting shows the mourning after the crucifixion of Christ. Christ is found dead and bleeding in the painting with the nails that pinned him to the cross next to his legs. You can see a priest and a nun above him and two men trying to cover his body with white cloth, which could symbolize purity and after life. The woman to the left has something in her hand in a form of kettle, which may contain water. This symbolizes holy water, that by her movement in the picture, is going to be sprinkled onto Christ. Water in the background symbolizes purity. The priest and the nun are in the painting to show their eternal devotion to Christ and to show the belief in Christianity.

One day when I was wandering around Bowers Museum, I came across nine oversized paintings shown in an exhibition made entirely by one extraordinary 69-year-old Buddhist monk in Nepal named Shashi Dhoj Tulachan, a second generation thangka artist living. The practice of thangka art has been around for centuries and is carried out by highly trained monks for the purpose of teaching about Buddha and the tenets of the Buddhist religion. The paintings attracted me because they were so big and colourful that I had to spend quite some time to fully absorb the beauty of the art. They are not thangka paintings in the traditional sense. Thangkas are