preview

Meursault Conformity

Good Essays
Open Document

Throughout The Stranger, Albert Camus addresses the issue of conformity within society, as well as the consequences that arise from not following the moral guidelines imposed by it. From the beginning, the author presents Meursault as an outsider. Previously translated as The Estranged One, The Outsider, and The Foreigner, there is a sense of ambiguity when interpreting the title in relation to the character of Meursault, however with careful examination, Camus’ attempt at glorifying the seclusion felt by one who does not adhere to modern societal standards and exposing society’s superficial scope on individuality becomes apparent. Contrasting man’s natural desire for individuality against society’s restriction on such freedom in order to restrain …show more content…

Through his behavior towards others, it is possible to asses that Meursault is not unable to feel emotion, seen in his recognition of separation from society and feeling ashamed of it as observed through his constant apologies and justifications to others. Despite this, he is still detached from human feelings and experiences such as empathy, love, and affection. This quality is one of the main reasons that he cannot conform with societal norms as he is unable to form stable and healthy relationships with others. Two main examples of this include Meursault’s relationship with Raymond and Marie. When Meursault and Raymond first meet, he shows no interest in the emotional aspects of a friendship such as support and trust, but instead he assesses the quality of their connection by the physical benefits he can earn from Raymond. He made the decision to go over to his house based on the convenience of not having to cook dinner and decided that they would be good friends because he “knew about …show more content…

Camus gives him this power in order to give credibility to Meursault’s conclusions about society which he sees as absurd. After he kills the Arab, he unwillingly pledges himself to the laws of society and the implication that come with them. Upholding his belief that he should not be punished for what he has done, Meursault becomes a victim of social rules and ironically realizes that his fate relies on his ability to conform to society. During the trial, while the judge, jury, and audience base their case on assumptions and assertions that don’t necessarily hold true, Camus encourages the readers to sympathize with Meursault and evaluate the absurdity of society in their own terms, analyzing the judicial system, religious systems, and other customs imposed on individuals by the masses, leading them to conclude that despite behaving in an “immoral” way, there is a lot of truth behind his observations. As the legal system focuses on establishing Meursault as a monster for not feeling regretful after killing the Arab, Camus continues to play on the theme of individual versus society by pushing the moral guidelines and making the readers question their own moral beliefs and the origins of them through analyzing whether Meursault was fairly convicted and justice was

Get Access